On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:45:52PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I must admit i am somewhat confused by all the different version numbers
> for shared libraries, the libtool manual didnt help a lot either.
>
> e.g. The definition of the age field in -version-info
> current:revision:age
>
> age
>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:50:49PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> There's more, if you replace the RH system they pre-install, you're
> losing the warranty on the hardware.
Where does it say that? IMHO, that would be _very_ stupid on IBM's part.
- Adam
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:19:55PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:55:34PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Evolution added an X-Evolution header to each message for status
> > > purposes.
> >
> > Merely _looking_ at a message with Evolution alters it? That is _truly_
> > ev
Robert Millan wrote:
>> And so on. "* Copyright (C) 2009 Hubert Figuiere" is simply false,
>
> Alright. So, I understand you mean option 1 (see my paragraph starting
> with "The new file seems to be asserting..." above).
>
> Unless there's a clear consensus in -legal that this is not a problem,
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Frankly there is far less difference between GLIBC 2.9 and EGLIBC 2.9
> than between GLIBC 2.9 and GLIBC 2.10.
>
> I could also have just taken the EGLIBC patches and put them in
> debian/patches, no one would have noticed.
I'm sure your decision will either,
1. work per
cript.
Is there any way to actually use experimental distribution in schroot?
- Adam
--
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://l
gt; dd-schroot-cmd :)
Is the source code only in /usr/local/bin on the schroot machines? Or
is there a better repository?
- Adam
--
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
y instead. For example, you can exclude description
completely.
My pet peeve with long descriptions has to do with copy/pasting large
blocks for *every* *single* *binary*, then adding a one line "This
package has debug symbols" or similar. Then a keyword search hits
every single binary...
the
> situation in both cases and enable us to ship them in Debian soon.
Hello,
Could this legal advice be posted to debian-legal or elsewhere in
public?
Thanks,
Adam
--
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On 27/10/16 07:39 AM, Antti J ä rvinen wrote:
Jörg Frings-Fürst writes:
> I have read the discussion about the openssl transition here again.
Possibly referring to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061 ??
> - The parallel use of release 1.0 and 1.1 will not be pursued?
Mi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Majer
* Package name: mosquitto-auth-plugin
Version : 0.0.7
Upstream Author : Jan-Piet Mens
* URL : https://github.com/jpmens/mosquitto-auth-plug
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo