Re: Bug#1101076: ITP: rsync -- rsync in Go! implements client and server, which can send or receive files (upload, download, all directions supported)

2025-03-22 Thread Antonio Russo
[not sending to the ITP bug, since it is off-topic for that] On 2025-03-22 15:50, Samuel Henrique wrote: Given the current status of the maintenance on rsync upstream, it's going to be handy to have an alternative packaged in the repository just in case. Could you elaborate on the state of rsy

Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?

2025-03-22 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > >But the core of my question here was about the apparent conflict of > >signing up for LowThresholdNmu as an indication that you are open for > >collaboration, yet not having the package in VCS, which would make the > >collaboration easier. I am trying to understand why certain people > >obj

Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?

2025-03-22 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2025-03-22T16:15:23-0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what email client and plugins do you use to > achieve your optimal email-based workflow? I don't see where Wookey made a claim that his workflow was "optimal", merely that it was effective for him personally. Debian Deve

Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?

2025-03-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2025-03-21 23:14:14) > Even when doing a NMU you should communicate your intent ahead. For > example https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu > recommends specifically submitting your nmudiff to the bug report and > waiting before proceeding to

Re: OpenPGP certificates with SHA-1 issues in Debian keyrings

2025-03-22 Thread Christoph Biedl
Guillem Jover wrote... > I'm happy to try to address anything that seems unclear, or get > someone else who might be able to answer! And as Holger suggested > elsewhere, we can probably also create a FAQ on the wiki with some of > this to point to people. Thanks for your explanations, things are

Re: Documentation for Package Maintainers regarding Translations (was: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do)

2025-03-22 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Marc, Am Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:44:47AM +0100 schrieb Marc Haber: > tl;dr: New Wiki Page https://wiki.debian.org/I18n/ForPackageMaintainers, > please review I just did it. I usually updated it right away, but at one or two points it is more like a discussion. And due to my changes some redu

Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?

2025-03-22 Thread Wookey
On 2025-03-21 15:14 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: But the core of my question here was about the apparent conflict of signing up for LowThresholdNmu as an indication that you are open for collaboration, yet not having the package in VCS, which would make the collaboration easier. I am trying to u

Re: fluster add epoch

2025-03-22 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Saturday, March 22, 2025 1:09:29 PM Mountain Standard Time Christopher Obbard wrote: > Hi! > > For the package fluster, upstream at > http://github.com/fluendo/fluster/, we have a slight mistake with > the upstream versioning and I would like to add an epoch > > The current version in debian

Bug#1101029: ITP: golang-agwa-go-listener -- library for creating net.Listeners

2025-03-22 Thread Daniel Gröber
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Gröber X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, d...@darkboxed.org * Package name: golang-agwa-go-listener Version : 0.6.1 Upstream Contact: Andrew Ayer * URL : https://github.com/AGWA/go-listener * License :

mostly just +1 (Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?)

2025-03-22 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 08:24:34AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Some of us (me included) prefer Salsa over Github or Sourcehut or other > forges, but what we use is its git hosting service without its optional > web-centric services (regardless if accessed via a web browser or a web > CLI tool)

Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?

2025-03-22 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
> > Just out of curiosity, what email client and plugins do you use to > > achieve your optimal email-based workflow? > > I don't see where Wookey made a claim that his workflow was "optimal", > merely that it was effective for him personally. Debian Developers are > a diverse bunch and approach p

Re: Bug#1101076: ITP: rsync -- rsync in Go! implements client and server, which can send or receive files (upload, download, all directions supported)

2025-03-22 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 21:50:00 +, Samuel Henrique wrote: * Package name: rsync This is going to need a different name, unless you are aiming for it to completely replace and supersede the original (samba.org) rsync. Upstream seems to call their main executable gokr-rsync, which seem

Re: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS for a package?

2025-03-22 Thread Wookey
On 2025-03-22 16:15 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: Thanks for the explanation Wookey on why you prefer to not use VCS for Debian packaging, and why others using VCS, and thus in Debian Salsa, creates extra work for you. Just out of curiosity, what email client and plugins do you use to achieve

Bug#1101076: ITP: rsync -- rsync in Go! implements client and server, which can send or receive files (upload, download, all directions supported)

2025-03-22 Thread Samuel Henrique
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Henrique X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name: rsync Version : 0.2.6-1 Upstream Author : Michael Stapelberg * URL : https://github.com/gokrazy/rsync * License : BS