Le Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 10:46:25AM +1100, Stuart Prescott a écrit :
> It's great to see more packages being maintained on salsa. I've certainly
> noticed that it is making working on packages much simpler.
>
> > > In my campaign, I stated [os1] that I aimed to reduce the number of
> > > packages m
Le 07/01/2025 à 21:27, Russ Allbery a écrit :
I think I'm missing something. Why does the use of this file knock the
package out of main? We are distributing the source code for this file,
and it is presumably under a free software license.
+1
OCaml uses a similar scheme.
Cheers,
--
Stéphan
On Thursday, January 9, 2025 2:36:21 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> if you care about adequate, *please* tone down the negativity and file actual
> bugs with specifics
+1
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nick black left as an exercise for the reader:
> > The bootstrap is circular and has to be kicked off with a binary blob that
> > can't be recreated until one has finished the bootstrap, which is
> > certainly not ideal, but is also not that atypical for compiler
> > bootstrapping problems. I don't
On Thu 2025-01-09 07:55:36 +0100, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> GnuPG 2.4 was released in 2022, long before the LibrePGP schism. It is
> generally not clear to me how the divergence from upstream is a reason
> to favor 2.2 over 2.4, except that patches have to be ported (once?).
sadly, 2.4 was relea
Russ Allbery left as an exercise for the reader:
> I think I'm missing something. Why does the use of this file knock the
> package out of main? We are distributing the source code for this file,
> and it is presumably under a free software license.
but we are not distributing it in a way such tha
On Thu Jan 9, 2025 at 10:29 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > hi Holger,
>
> as you have addressed me here and...
>
> > On Wed Jan 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > (actually adequate is run on many mo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: arif
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sos
Version : 4.8.2
Upstream Contact: Jake Hunsaker
* URL : https://github.com/sosreport/sos
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:22:22PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> There have been discussions about adding adequate to Salsa CI and run
> it by default as part of the piuparts job. If you are now preparing to
> have adequate by default in piuparts, then it would make sense to have
> it by default
Hi Stuart,
changing subject and suggest moving the topic to Debian QA list where
it probably belongs.
Am Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:54:47AM +1100 schrieb Stuart Prescott:
> Good point on anonscm as well... that really does blow out the numbers.
Unfortunately yes.
> However... some of them still w
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> hi Holger,
as you have addressed me here and...
> On Wed Jan 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > (actually adequate is run on many more binary packages on piuparts.d.o,
> > because
> > p.d.o is not only
Hi Helmut,
I have a general remark and a technical one.
At 2025-01-08T15:21:42+0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I have bad news about /usr-move. The primary mitigation (M18) for
> aliased diversions (P3) as implemented by me in quite a few packages
> is broken.
[...]
> If your have a lot of time and
12 matches
Mail list logo
