Re: speech question.

Mike Coulombe, le sam. 16 nov. 2024 17:34:36 -0800, a ecrit: > It's an intel pch card if that can help you guys. We need more details, such as lspci, kernel logs about possibly loading a kernel, etc. Samuel

Bug#1087685: ITP: golang-github-smallstep-crypto -- Crypto is a collection of packages used by Smallstep products

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-smallstep-crypto Version : 0.54.2-1 Upstream Author : Smallstep * URL : https://github.com/smallstep/crypto * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : C

Re: Is there a point to retaining src:pth?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 11:21:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 03:22 +0100, наб wrote: > > src:pth has been gone from testing since August. > > There are no rdeps and no rbuilddeps, > > and only FTBFS bugs since like 2012. > > I can hardly imagine a point to Pth at all in 20

DEP-18 v2: request for comments

Hi all, I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request based Collaboration for Debian packages If you are in favor of having this as a DRAFT in the DEP direc

Re: DEP-0, DEP0 or DEP 0?

Thanks for the comments! Let's implement this. Please vote on which variant you prefer by giving a thumbs up at https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/13 Unify DEP spelling with a dash instead of a space (e.g. "DEP-0") OR https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/mer

Bug#1087753: ITP: golang-github-notaryproject-tspclient-go -- Golang implementation of the Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) client as specified in RFC3161

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-notaryproject-tspclient-go Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Notary Project * URL : https://github.com/notaryproject/tspclient-go * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang:

Re: DEP-0, DEP0 or DEP 0?

* Otto Kekäläinen: " Re: DEP-0, DEP0 or DEP 0?" (Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:23:50 -0800): Hi Otto, > Let's implement this. Please vote on which variant you prefer by > giving a thumbs up at > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/13 > Unify DEP spelling with a dash instead

Re: Is there a point to retaining src:pth?

On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 03:22 +0100, наб wrote: > Hi! > > src:pth has been gone from testing since August. > There are no rdeps and no rbuilddeps, > and only FTBFS bugs since like 2012. > I can hardly imagine a point to Pth at all in 2024 > (or any time after ubiquitous pthread support), > so it rea