Am 27.09.2024 08:31 schrieb Christian Kastner :On 2024-09-23 13:09, Lukas Märdian wrote:
>> So on desktop installations including NetworkManager, netplan will be
>> configured to do nothing? Why install netplan at all on desktop systems
>> then?
>
> Because it allows to add configuration in a
Can you clarify why you are describing these autoremoves as "spurious"? Isn't
this just the dependency system working the way it is supposed to?
jik
On September 27, 2024 4:07:07 AM EDT, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>"nose" is RC buggy. It was until a few days ago in the "key packages set".
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 10:07:07AM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "nose" is RC buggy. It was until a few days ago in the "key packages set".
>
> After recent upload of piuparts, nose dropped out of the key package set,
> as expected.
>
> What was not expected is that nose started the
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 10:58:02AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> An interesting research topic is probably what is the non-key key
> package depending on nose, and can that be fixed soon. A good
> starting point might be "pkg-perl-tools", which is affected but
> seems unlikely to directly depe
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 11:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:27:13PM +0200, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> > So on desktop installations including NetworkManager, netplan will be
> > configured to do nothing? Why install netplan at all on desktop systems
> > then?
>
> > And
Hi,
in general, for any cross-building issues, please feel free to write to
debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Quoting Iustin Pop (2024-09-27 16:23:16)
> I just added a barebone config for one of my packages, and while the pipeline
> worked, I got an error for the arm64 cross-compile that seems to be
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 15:34 +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> My ideas was not so much about switching from one networking daemon to
> another.
> In most cases users will probably stick to the network stack of their chosen
> environment. With systemd-networkd and NetworkManager being good candida
[Dropping CC to the upstream mailing list.]
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 04:56:21PM +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> On 30/08/2024 17:11, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This is now implemented in Debian unstable. I called the packages
> > openssh-client-gssapi and openssh-server-gssapi, with the intention of
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:27:13PM +0200, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> So on desktop installations including NetworkManager, netplan will be
> configured to do nothing? Why install netplan at all on desktop systems
> then?
> And if it does manage some interfaces, it is probably a regression to
> break GUI ne
* Alexandre Detiste [240927 10:07]:
> "nose" is RC buggy. It was until a few days ago in the "key packages set".
[..]
> What was not expected is that nose started the autoremoval counter of
> seemingly ~700 unrelated packages.
>
> How this does work :-| ?
I imagine exactly like you are seeing it
On 30/08/2024 17:11, Colin Watson wrote:
This is now implemented in Debian unstable. I called the packages
openssh-client-gssapi and openssh-server-gssapi, with the intention of
splitting out both GSS-API authentication and key exchange support
later: that is, in trixie+1 I intend to build opens
Hi!
On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 12:28:51 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, vil...@debian.org
> * Package name: golang-github-mitchellh-pointerstructure
> Ver
On 2024-09-24 09:18:45, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We've overhauled the README.md at
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline to be as complete as
> possible, yet clear and to the point. If you are not yet using Salsa
> CI for pre-upload quality assurance for your package, you might
Hi László,
On 9/26/24 21:12, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:46 PM Bernd Schubert
> wrote:
>> I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a
>> distribution?
> In what sense? Upstream ABI breakages don't help, I wait for 3.17 at
> least if that helps
Hi Otto,
On 2024-09-24 18:18, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> We've overhauled the README.md at
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline to be as complete as
> possible, yet clear and to the point. If you are not yet using Salsa
> CI for pre-upload quality assurance for your package, you might w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, vil...@debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-mitchellh-pointerstructure
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Contact: Mitchell Hashimoto
* URL : https://github
On 2024-09-24 09:18:45, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We've overhauled the README.md at
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline to be as complete as
> possible, yet clear and to the point. If you are not yet using Salsa
> CI for pre-upload quality assurance for your package, you might
Hi!
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 09:38, Iustin Pop wrote:
...> I just added a barebone config for one of my packages, and while the
> pipeline worked, I got an error for the arm64 cross-compile that seems
> to be due to tooling issues:
In addition to what Johannes replied about cross-builds having is
18 matches
Mail list logo
