Hi all,
On 03-08-2024 22:37, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
At the bottom, is it ok for a package to have a single maintainer or not?
I have never wanted to be the single maintainer of a package, and here I
am, I'm member of a bunch of teams, but most of my packages uploads (not
a lot luckily) are f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-thumbhash
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Justin
* URL : https://github.com/justinforlenza/thumbhash-py/
* License
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:37:42PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > 2. Standardizing around a single (or small number of) workflows will make
> > some people unhappy. But that is an acceptable price to pay because of the
> > general benefit to the project *as long as the correct solution is
> >
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:15:33PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> one problem I have with NMUs in team-maintained package is that they
> often bypass Salsa… Would it make sense to add to the DEP a request
> that NMUs are started from and pushed to the default branch?
Only if DEP-18 also includes
Il 04/08/2024 15:36, Andrey Rakhmatullin ha scritto:
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:15:33PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
one problem I have with NMUs in team-maintained package is that they
often bypass Salsa… Would it make sense to add to the DEP a request
that NMUs are started from and pushed to
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 04:15:13PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> Il 04/08/2024 15:36, Andrey Rakhmatullin ha scritto:
> > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:15:33PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > one problem I have with NMUs in team-maintained package is that they
> > > often bypass Salsa… Would it ma
6 matches
Mail list logo
