Urgent help with upload of netatalk to prevent being autoremoval from testing

2024-06-29 Thread Daniel Markstedt
Hi all, I have drafted a release of the netatalk package that addresses 5 critical deb bugs. However, I myself am only an uploader in name and don't yet have actual upload privileges. And my co-maintainer, who does​ have privileges, has been too busy IRL to assist for quite some time. Normally

Re: Urgent help with upload of netatalk to prevent being autoremoval from testing

2024-06-29 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
Am 29. Juni 2024 13:32:40 MESZ schrieb Daniel Markstedt : > >Normally I would be more patient, but right now netatalk is slated to get >removed from Trixie testing on July 4th due to one of the bugs >(libgcrypt-config deprecation.) > I cannot offer any action right now (busy IRL as well), but: d

Re: Urgent help with upload of netatalk to prevent being autoremoval from testing

2024-06-29 Thread Daniel Markstedt
On Saturday, June 29th, 2024 at 8:48 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > > Am 29. Juni 2024 13:32:40 MESZ schrieb Daniel Markstedt dan...@mindani.net: > > > Normally I would be more patient, but right now netatalk is slated to get > > removed from Trixie testing on July 4th due to one of the

Re: Urgent help with upload of netatalk to prevent being autoremoval from testing

2024-06-29 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 02:13:04PM +, Daniel Markstedt wrote: > Netatalk got dropped from Bookworm because there was a changing of the guards > of upstream maintainers during the freeze time. > So I'm just naturally anxious about missing the boat again for Trixie. Just make sure it's in testi

Bug#1074485: ITP: krdp -- Library for creating an RDP server

2024-06-29 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Patrick Franz X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, delta...@debian.org, debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org * Package name: krdp Version : 6.1.0 Upstream Contact: KDE * URL : https://invent.kde.org/plasma/krdp * License

Re: Builds that pass locally but fail on sbuild? (Re: Reviving schroot as used by sbuild)

2024-06-29 Thread Richard Lewis
Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Could you point me to some Debian Bug # or otherwise share examples of > cases when a build succeeded locally but failed on official Debian > builders due to something that is specific for sbuild/schroot? I believe both these uploads https://tracker.debian.org/news/128

Re: Reviving schroot as used by sbuild

2024-06-29 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2024-06-25 15:02, Simon McVittie wrote: > Could we use a container framework that is also used outside the Debian > bubble, rather than writing our own from first principles every time, and > ending up with a single-maintainer project being load-bearing for Debian > *again*? I had hoped that a

Re: Builds that pass locally but fail on sbuild? (Re: Reviving schroot as used by sbuild)

2024-06-29 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Richard" == Richard Lewis writes: Richard> Otto Kekäläinen writes: >> Could you point me to some Debian Bug # or otherwise share >> examples of cases when a build succeeded locally but failed on >> official Debian builders due to something that is specific for >> sbuil

Re: Urgent help with upload of netatalk to prevent being autoremoval from testing

2024-06-29 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Daniel" == Daniel Markstedt writes: Daniel> Hi all, I have drafted a release of the netatalk package Daniel> that addresses 5 critical deb bugs. However, I myself am Daniel> only an uploader in name and don't yet have actual upload Daniel> privileges. And my co-maintainer