Hi Andreas,
* Andreas Tille [2024-03-15 07:31]:
Hi,
thanks to the next round of Lucas' FTBFS QA rebuilds (at least) one
package of the R pkg team is affected by some strange linker issue
#1066409 r-cran-v8: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lv8: No such file or directory
which boils down to[1]
g++ -st
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-mercantile
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Contact: Sean Gillies
* URL : https://github.com/mapbox/mercantile
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-contextily
Version : 1.5.2
Upstream Contact: Dani Arribas-Bel
* URL : https://github.com/geopandas/contextily
* License : BSD-3-clause
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-momepy
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Contact: Martin Fleischmann
* URL : https://github.com/pysal/momepy
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:03:57PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is anyone perhaps planning to fix cargo?
>
> For example curl isn't building on armel/armhf now and numerous packages
> that depend of curl are not building on armel/armhf.
>
> Thanks in advance to the person who steps up
Hi!
pe 15. maalisk. 2024 klo 6.56 Fabian Grünbichler
kirjoitti:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:03:57PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is anyone perhaps planning to fix cargo?
> >
> > For example curl isn't building on armel/armhf now and numerous packages
> > that depend of curl are
On 2024-03-14 22:03 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is anyone perhaps planning to fix cargo?
Yes. We have been working on it this week (e.g. ema built cargo for armhf),
but that is not sufficient to unbung the
curl->stunnel4->python->crypography->cargo loop.
I tried building the patched
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 08:42:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:47:02PM +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > The time_t transition seems to be stalled due to issues on armel/armhf
> > architecture. My understanding is, as long as this transition isn't over,
> > uploaders of af
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:16:40AM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> pe 15. maalisk. 2024 klo 6.56 Fabian Grünbichler
> kirjoitti:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:03:57PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Is anyone perhaps planning to fix cargo?
> > >
> > > For example c
Hi,
Disclaimer: exception only valid while the time_t transition is ongoing.
On 15-03-2024 6:15 a.m., Steve Langasek wrote:
Migration to testing is largely out of control of the maintainers at this
point, it's very much dependent on folks rebootstrapping armel and armhf
against the new library
On 3/15/24 21:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
Disclaimer: exception only valid while the time_t transition is ongoing.
On 15-03-2024 6:15 a.m., Steve Langasek wrote:
Migration to testing is largely out of control of the maintainers at this
point, it's very much dependent on folks rebootstrapping ar
On 3/15/24 07:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
I simply remove all those testing removal warnings in my
mailbox to cope with this and by doing so I'm probably missing real
issues I should rather care about.
I know what you're talking about: anyone that maintains a lot of
packages always receive waves
12 matches
Mail list logo
