Bug#1064817: ITP: elixir-earmark-parser -- Pure Elixir Markdown Parser

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergei Golovan X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: elixir-earmark-parser Version : 1.4.39 Upstream Contact: Robert Dober , Dave Thomas * URL : https://github.com/RobertDober/earmark_parser * License

Bug#1064818: ITP: golang-sourcehut-rockorager-vaxis -- A modern TUI library for go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Robin Jarry * Package name: golang-sourcehut-rockorager-vaxis Version : 0.8.2-1 Upstream Author : Tim Culverhouse <> * URL : https://git.sr.ht/~rockorager/vaxis * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#1064819: ITP: elixir-makeup-c -- Makeup lexer for the C language

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergei Golovan X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: elixir-makeup-c Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Contact: Boyd Multerer * URL : https://github.com/elixir-makeup/makeup_c * License : BSD-2-clause Prog

Bug#1064820: ITP: elixir-makeup -- Generic syntax highlighter written in Elixir

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergei Golovan X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: elixir-makeup Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Contact: Tiago Barroso * URL : https://github.com/elixir-makeup/makeup * License : BSD-2-clause Programm

Bug#1064821: ITP: elixir-makeup-elixir -- Makeup lexer for the Elixir language

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergei Golovan X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: elixir-makeup-elixir Version : 0.16.1 Upstream Contact: Tiago Barroso * URL : https://github.com/elixir-makeup/makeup_elixir * License : BSD-2-cl

Bug#1064822: ITP: elixir-makeup-erlang -- Makeup lexer for the Erlang language

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergei Golovan X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: elixir-makeup-erlang Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Contact: Tiago Barroso * URL : https://github.com/elixir-makeup/makeup_erlang * License : BSD-2-cla

Re: time_t progress report

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 at 23:56:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > I have attached the full list of current packages missing correct builds in > experimental here for review. I am also attaching dd-list output for the > same. Please check whether you have packages on this list that need > attention.

time_t and backports

Hi folks, As a person that frequently uploads to bookworm-backports, I am wondering how we are handling the time_t transition there? The picture of synchronization with testing is a little complicated over there. If you change the default build flags, you produce unexpected surprises over bookwo

Re: time_t and backports

On 2024-02-26 John Goerzen wrote: > Hi folks, > As a person that frequently uploads to bookworm-backports, I am > wondering how we are handling the time_t transition there? > The picture of synchronization with testing is a little complicated over > there. If you change the default build flags,

Splitting collectd dependencies [Was: Re: Another take on package relationship substvars]

None of this is relevant to the substvars discussion, but the collectd side is worth looking at on its own. On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 01:36:33PM +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > On 24/02/24 11:26, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > Absolutely. collectd for example - otherwise you would install *all* > > plugi

Re: time_t progress report

Hi Simon, On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:40:56AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > glib2.0 # already in experimental > The upstream version in experimental is unsuitable for unstable, but it's > "the same shape" as the version in unstable in all the places that matter, > and we ack