Hello,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:08:49 +0100
Alexander Sulfrian wrote:
>
> You will need a file mdl.1 with the following content:
>
> .so man1/markdownlint.1
>
> and markdownlint.1 should be the normal manpage without a .so line.
>
This logic provides exactly the relay I sought out. Thanks a
Norwid Behrnd writes:
> Recently, I started to upgrade the Debian package about
> `markdownlint`,[1] a syntax checker. The initially packaged version
> 0.12.0 provided a binary of name `ruby-mdl` which now becomes a
> transition dummy package in favour of the functionally updated
> `markdownlint
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:44:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The good news is that if you're using debhelper, you don't have to care
> about how man handles these indirections and can just use a symlink.
> Install the man page into usr/share/man/man1 under whatever name is
> canonical (possibly
Andrey Rakhmatullin writes:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:44:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The good news is that if you're using debhelper, you don't have to care
>> about how man handles these indirections and can just use a symlink.
>> Install the man page into usr/share/man/man1 under what
* Theodore Ts'o:
> If you can get upstream a patch so that coreutils could try to dlopen
> OpenSSL and use it if it is available, but skip it if it is not, that
> might be one way to avoid OpenSSL going into essential. The challenge
> is that OpenSSL is not known for its ability to maintain a sta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Henriksson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: speakersafetyd
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/AsahiLinux/speakersafetyd/issues
* URL : https://github.com/AsahiLinux/speakersafe
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:41:12 -0800
Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Oh, indeed, you're right and I misread that. So I think you can just use
> symlinks, period, and not worry about .so (although you have to handle
> nodoc builds correctly).
>
Well, one file with a list like
```debian/markdownlint.man
Luca Boccassi wrote on 10/11/2023 at 16:08:30+0100:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 14:22, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>>
>> Luca Boccassi wrote on 10/11/2023 at 15:00:24+0100:
>>
>> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 13:45, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Luca Boccassi writes:
>> >>
>> >> > If we want to start
Hello,
For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about
changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A
quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian and Ubuntu
(and I assume most other downstreams) use the sysvinit-utils version.
9 matches
Mail list logo
