On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:06:18AM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Background: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011666
>
> Can someone advise me as to the correct procedure for merging upstream
> release candidate archives into https://salsa.debian.org/debian/groff ?
Just imp
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 11:13:29PM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I've sent you a couple of mails over the past few months, but I don't
> recall seeing a reply.
Sorry about that! Feel free to grab me on IRC if I'm not replying to
email.
> I am not a proficient gbp user, but I think I have d
Hi!
During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian. Currently,
there are eight possible systems allowed and one might specify several of them
for
one package. No package makes use of several Vcs references and frankly I do not
see why this was supported in the first place.
Fo
On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 14:24 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian. Currently,
> there are eight possible systems allowed and one might specify several of them
> for
> one package. No package makes use of several Vcs references and
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian. Currently,
> there are eight possible systems allowed
I see a difference between (dis)allowing a VCS in the Vcs-* fields and
(dis)allowing maintainers to store packa
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian. Currently,
> there are eight possible systems allowed and one might specify several of
> them for
> one package. No package makes use of several Vcs refere
Am 26.02.23 um 17:26 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
I do not get your point what we would gain if the cvsd maintainer
drops the Vcs-Cvs reference while continuing to maintain the package
in cvs.
That would be a prerequisite to drop Vcs-Cvs support.
It is the last package that points to a working CVS URL.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 07:39:09AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> As Jonas mentions, including the years allows people to know when works
> enter the public domain and the license becomes more liberal.
> I think our users are better served by knowing when the Debian packaging
> would enter the publ
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian. Currently,
> there are eight possible systems allowed and one might specify several of
> them for
> one package. No package makes use of several Vcs refere
Hello,
On Sun 26 Feb 2023 at 02:24PM +01, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian. Currently,
> there are eight possible systems allowed and one might specify several of
> them for
> one package. No package makes use of several Vcs refer
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 07:19:41AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>...
> * A package adds -Werror to the build. When a new toolchain version is
>uploaded, it triggers a new warning and that makes the package FTBFS.
>...
> When building affected packages with more recent toolchains, such build
> f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benedikt Straub
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : heart
Version : 0.1
Upstream Contact: Benedikt Straub
* URL : https://github.com/Noordfrees/Heart
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Java
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 04:32:59PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 26.02.2023 um 16:57 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 03:47:49PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, dem 25.02.2023 um 16:15 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > >
> > > [..]
> > > > FYI:
>
On Sunday, 26 February 2023 17:59:52 CET Bill Allombert wrote:
> > During the last weeks I had a look at the Vcs situation in Debian.
> >
> > For the allowed systems the situation in unstable is the following:
> > ...
> > svn is used by ~130 packages, many of which point to bad URLs.
> >
> > We c
Am Sonntag, dem 26.02.2023 um 19:45 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
>
[..]
> Debian Policy §4.9 says that *attempting* to access the internet
> is forbidden:
>
> For packages in the main archive, required targets must not attempt
> network access, except, via the loopback interface, to services on
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 07:25:57PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>...
> Apart from me not liking proprietary systems in general and M$ GitHub in
> particular, you also run the risk of things disappearing entirely without any
> notice and without any recourse.
Perhaps tomorrow some company like
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 07:15:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> What you describe is an RC bug as soon as the more recent toolchain
> becomes default, and the correct solution is to not build with -Werror.
>
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nowerror would imply that building with -Werror
> by default would be O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fab Stz
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: czkawka-gui
Version : 5.1.0
Upstream Author : Rafał Mikrut
* URL : https://github.com/qarmin/czkawka
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: rust
Descript
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 26.02.2023 um 19:45 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> >
> [..]
> > Debian Policy §4.9 says that *attempting* to access the internet
> > is forbidden:
> >
> > For packages in the main archive, required targets must not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arthur Diniz
* Package name: tfk8s
Version : 0.1.10-1
Upstream Author : John Houston
* URL : https://github.com/jrhouston/tfk8s
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Tool for converting Kubernetes Y
Am Sonntag, dem 26.02.2023 um 21:36 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, dem 26.02.2023 um 19:45 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > >
> > [..]
> > > Debian Policy §4.9 says that *attempting* to access the internet
> > > is forbidd
On Sunday, 26 February 2023 20:06:26 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 07:25:57PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > Apart from me not liking proprietary systems in general and M$ GitHub in
> > particular, you also run the risk of things disappearing entirely without
> > any notice a
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 09:20:13PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > > > Debian Policy §4.9 says that *attempting* to access the internet
> > > > is forbidden:
> > > >
> > > > For packages in the main archive, required targets must not
> > > > attempt
> > > > network access, except, via the loo
Diederik de Haas writes:
> Question as I don't know: is that only the package change that gets
> uploaded to the Debian archive, or is there also a place where the (git)
> history of the changes leading up to a new upload gets stored?
dgit maintains a history of every package in Debian. If you
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 09:57:34PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 February 2023 20:06:26 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > For anything in Debian, the package sources in Debian would not
> > disappear when a repository (or salsa) disappears.
>
> Question as I don't know: is that only
On Sunday, 26 February 2023 22:38:51 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 09:57:34PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Sunday, 26 February 2023 20:06:26 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >...
> >
> > > For anything in Debian, the package sources in Debian would not
> > > disappear when a rep
[please CC me in replies as I'm not subscribed to d-devel]
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Diederik de Haas writes:
> > Question as I don't know: is that only the package change that gets
> > uploaded to the Debian archive, or is there also a place where the (git)
> > history of the changes leading up to
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 19:09:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 26.02.2023 um 19:45 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> >
> [..]
> > Debian Policy §4.9 says that *attempting* to access the internet
> > is forbidden:
> >
> > For packages in the main archive, required targets must not att
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 11:42:25PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>...
> The reason that I'm such a proponent of that is that 3 weeks or 3 months from
> now, there's a reasonable chance that you (the author/committer) does no
> longer remember the details of that commit.
> In 3+ years that will b
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 00:17:41 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
> > dgit maintains a history of every package in Debian.
>
> AFAIK the Debian Xen Team does use dgit (not surprising given dgit's
> maintainer (and author?)) ... and that drives me insane.
> I'm very sure that i
Hey all!
Here's a status update on the non-free-firmware changes that we voted
for last year [1].
Cyril has done a huge amount of work [2], implementing the bulk of
what we need. We released d-i bookworm alpha 2 last weekend [3],
including those changes. Our own testing shows that things work wel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joseph Nahmias
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-j...@lists.debian.org,
j...@nahmias.net, cryptacu...@googlegroups.com
Control: -1 blocks 1031807
* Package name: cryptacular
Version : 1.2.5
Upstream Authors: Daniel Fisher
32 matches
Mail list logo
