Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: crosvm
Version : 0.0.1?
Upstream Contact: crosvm-...@chromium.org
URL : https://chromium.googlesource.com/crosvm/crosvm/
License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jochen Sprickerhof
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: python-comm
Version : 0.1.2
* URL : https://github.com/ipython/comm
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Des
Greetings, fellow Debianites,
I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any dh_auto_test
target in d/rules.
The builds all fail, as described here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2
and I do not understand why.
Any soul to help me with this questi
Hello,
On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any
dh_auto_test
target in d/rules.
The builds all fail, as described here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2
and I do not understand why.
Any soul to help
On 12/15/22 10:34, Andrius Merkys wrote:
However, I have no idea why '-o 0 -g 0' options are used. They do not
seem to be used before.
Recent changes in debhelper, see:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/-/commit/ca66cf4bc74fe31b3d5c8131788e7fdd8731
https://salsa.debian.org/debian
On 2022-12-15 11:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/15/22 10:34, Andrius Merkys wrote:
However, I have no idea why '-o 0 -g 0' options are used. They do not
seem to be used before.
Recent changes in debhelper, see:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/-/commit/ca66cf4bc74fe31b3d5c813
Andrius Merkys:
Hello,
On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any
dh_auto_test
target in d/rules.
The builds all fail, as described here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2
and I do not understand why.
Greetings, Niels,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Andrius Merkys:
Hello,
On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have
any dh_auto_test
target in d/rules.
The builds all fail, as described here:
htt
Quoting Niels Thykier (2022-12-15 10:59:10)
> Long story short:
>
> * Bug in fakeroot (#1023286 + #1024544)
> * Me thinking it was a bug in debhelper so I tried to fix it
> (which did not work and broke on the way in)
> * Me realizing it was a bug in fakeroot and my change did not
>
I would like to add the following entry to the table of build
profiles in BuildProfileSpec:
Profile anme: `cargo-upstream`
Can cause changes to built binaries, including functional chnges. (Y)
Should not cause changes to set of build debs. (N)
Description:
Obtain Rust dependencies from crat
[ reply to d-devel only, as more suitable for Debian-wide issue ]
Quoting Ian Jackson (2022-12-15 11:41:13)
> I would like to add the following entry to the table of build
> profiles in BuildProfileSpec:
>
> Profile anme: `cargo-upstream`
> Can cause changes to built binaries, including functio
Hi Ian,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:41:13AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I would like to add the following entry to the table of build
> profiles in BuildProfileSpec:
>
> Profile anme: `cargo-upstream`
> Can cause changes to built binaries, including functional chnges. (Y)
> Should not cause cha
Hi Niels,
Thanks for the explanation (snipped here).
On 2022-12-15 11:59, Niels Thykier wrote:
Your options include:
* Migrate to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" if you can
Great, this indeed gets around the issue.
Best wishes,
Andrius
Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Proposed `cargo-upstream` dpkg-buildpackage etc.
build profile"):
> Similar pain for other upstream ecosystems as well - I know about npm
> for NodeJS modules, but imagine it is similar for Java and others as
> well.
Yes.
> What is the benefit of introducing a stand
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Proposed `cargo-upstream` dpkg-buildpackage etc.
build profile"):
> I have just one question: why make this rust-specific? I think a similar
> thing might be useful for golang packages (who also don't support shared
> libraries), or, heck, even Perl (if I'm willing to
Hi,
Is Qt6-base not in testing, for bookworm? I've an app (metview) that I
switched over Qt5->Qt6, should I move it back?
regards
Alastair
On 13/12/2022 20:27, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:
Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.
On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy
Hi!
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 15:27:18 +0100, Juri Grabowski wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: 1.79
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Juri Grabowski
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, deb...@jugra.de
> * Package name: distribution-gpg-keys
> Version : 1.7.9
> Upstream Author
Quoting Ian Jackson (2022-12-15 14:05:32)
> Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Proposed `cargo-upstream` dpkg-buildpackage
> etc. build profile"):
> > What is the benefit of introducing a standardized flag for this
> > relatively narrow scope, compared to doing non-standardized fetching of
> > crates _
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:51 AM Alastair McKinstry <
alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is Qt6-base not in testing, for bookworm? I've an app (metview) that I
> switched over Qt5->Qt6, should I move it back?
>
>
Bookworm currently has Qt 6.3.1 and 6.4.0 packaged.
> regards
>
> Alasta
Ian Jackson writes:
> I would like to add the following entry to the table of build
> profiles in BuildProfileSpec:
> Profile anme: `cargo-upstream`
> Can cause changes to built binaries, including functional chnges. (Y)
> Should not cause changes to set of build debs. (N)
> Description:
>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 15:27:18 +0100, Juri Grabowski wrote:
> > * Package name: distribution-gpg-keys
> > Upstream Author : Miroslav Suchý
> > * URL : https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys/
> > Descripti
Hi Ian,
Thank you very much for immediately taking this to the list. The
discussion I've seen thus far seems very constructive and useful to me.
Thanks to the other participants as well.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:41:13AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I would like to add the following entry to the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Federico Ceratto
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: nim-httpbeast
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Contact: Dominik Picheta
* URL : https://github.com/dom96/httpbeast
* License : Expat
Programming Lang:
Helmut Grohne writes ("Re: Proposed `cargo-upstream` dpkg-buildpackage etc.
build profile"):
> Thank you very much for immediately taking this to the list.
You're welcome.
Thanks for the review and the penetrating questions.
> I think that you imply here that all of the rust libraries would be
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 08:15:37AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> These are all RPM distributions, which is definitely not what one would
> expect in our context. At the very least the short desc would need to
> mention that, and I'd recommend having that in the name as well.
Thank you for
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The project name talks about gpg keys, but those are really OpenPGP
> keys (or even better, certificates). I've asked upstream to rename the
> project to avoid this common confusion. So you might want to wait until
> that's settl
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1254 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 162 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
Greetings.
I'm doing archive-wide rebuilds again.
I've just filed 21 bugs with subject "Missing build-depends on tzdata"
in bookworm (as tzdata is not build-essential).
This is of course not fun for the maintainers, but it's also not fun
for people doing QA, because those bugs could be caught
Quoting Santiago Vila (2022-12-16 02:15:13)
> I've just filed 21 bugs with subject "Missing build-depends on tzdata"
> in bookworm (as tzdata is not build-essential).
thank you for that!
> I can think of two solutions for this:
>
> A) Either debootstrap, when using buildd profile, installs only
29 matches
Mail list logo
