key packages RC bugs of the month December

2022-12-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear all, With only 1 month to go until the first freeze, another plea [1,2,3,4] to fix RC bugs in key packages [5]. Currently we have 234 RC bugs in key packages affecting bookworm [6] of which 160 are unresolved in unstable or experimental, aren't pending and don't have a patch. Here are aga

Re: propose: provide "docker" package as docker, not wmdocker

2022-12-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
Gioele Barabucci wrote: > On 05/12/22 18:19, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker >> (--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker >> (from docker.io)? > How was the transition from git-the-file-viewer to git-the

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andreas, Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > > I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work: > > 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch. Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happened what I tried with 2.3.2[1] at least the resulting configure.ac i

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Boyuan Yang
Hi, 在 2022-12-11星期日的 16:35 +0100,Andreas Tille写道: > Hi Andreas, > > Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > > > > I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work: > > > > 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch. > > Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happ

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source

2022-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 12:21:18PM +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > > So far for the actual case (bug report in CC). > > > > For the general case I somehow understand the consensus here on the list > > that a missing configure.ac can be considered a bug but the severity > > serious is not real

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 10:43:37AM -0500 schrieb Boyuan Yang: > > Not sure if it is the root cause, but there's an obvious typo with quote at > L12: > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/hmmer2/-/blob/423388accbb8c622edb663c845f1f5a6336256e1/debian/rules#L12 > . Ahhh, thanks - I was seeking for the

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Andreas, Hi Andreas, Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work: 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch. Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happened what I tried with 2.3.2[1] at least the resulting confi

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source

2022-12-11 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 12/11/22 16:47, Andreas Tille wrote: May be I interpreted posts in this thread wrongly but I read it like serious is a to high severity. Moreover what does this mean for other packages where configure.ac is missing? It depends on the licence, to some extent. The GPL's definition of "

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source

2022-12-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 16:47 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could you give some arguents for your feeling. See the posts I made in this and earlier threads: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4363a2435e61bf351c7d3605136c3652118eae2f.ca...@debian.org https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/50184a5

Migration bug ?

2022-12-11 Thread Yadd
Hi, I pushed 2 versions of node-rollup since December 09, but migration process never started (at least looking at tracker.d.o). Is there something broken ? Cheers, Yadd https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-rollup

Re: Migration bug ?

2022-12-11 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:28:27AM +0100, Yadd wrote: > Hi, > > I pushed 2 versions of node-rollup since December 09, but migration process > never started (at least looking at tracker.d.o). Is there something broken ? > > Cheers, > Yadd > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-rollup Note that t

Re: Migration bug ?

2022-12-11 Thread Yadd
On 12/12/2022 07:38, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:28:27AM +0100, Yadd wrote: Hi, I pushed 2 versions of node-rollup since December 09, but migration process never started (at least looking at tracker.d.o). Is there something broken ? Cheers, Yadd https://tracker.debian

Re: Migration bug ?

2022-12-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, On 12 December 2022 11:58:27 am IST, Yadd wrote: >Hi, > >I pushed 2 versions of node-rollup since December 09, but migration process >never started (at least looking at tracker.d.o). Is there something broken ? You can track the migration here: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=