El 02/10/22 a las 20:42, Michael Biebl escribió:
>
> Am 02.10.22 um 20:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> > On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > > will
> > > be very obvious. But if you currently have non-free configured but
> > > don't
> > > add the new firmware section, everyt
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/2/22 22:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Michael Biebl writes:
> >
> > > The main difference is, that the renaming caused an error message by
> > > apt, so you knew something needed to be fixed.
> >
> > One could argue that havin
On 02/10/22 at 22:21 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2022-10-02 21:51:52)
> > On 02/10/22 at 04:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > Nǐmen hǎo!
> > > I did another _source_ rebuild of the archive -- checking if every package
> > > is capable of repa
3 octobre 2022 11:11 "Santiago Ruano Rincón" a écrit:
> El 02/10/22 a las 20:42, Michael Biebl escribió:
>> Am 02.10.22 um 20:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
>> On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> In Bullseye we changed the name/syntax for the security repository, and
>> for that a
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 7:31 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>
> 3 octobre 2022 11:11 "Santiago Ruano Rincón" a écrit:
> > El 02/10/22 a las 20:42, Michael Biebl escribió:
> >> Am 02.10.22 um 20:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> >> On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> In Bullseye w
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> * Check/add support for the non-free-firmware section in various
> places:
> + debmirror (?)
Done in debmirror 1:2.37. I guess we need to cherry-pick this to
bullseye too? I know bullseye doesn't have non-free-firmware (which
Colin Watson (2022-10-03):
> Done in debmirror 1:2.37. I guess we need to cherry-pick this to
> bullseye too? I know bullseye doesn't have non-free-firmware (which
> is fine, the new debmirror doesn't object), but most people running
> mirrors probably run stable rather than testing.
Thanks for
Steve McIntyre (2022-10-02):
> + ftpsync (?)
I don't think that's needed. Using buster's and more recently bullseye's
version, I have this locally:
drwxr-xr-x 4 mirror mirror 4096 Jul 19 04:16
/srv/mirrors/debian/dists/bookworm/non-free-firmware/by-hash/
which matches when dak's config g
El 03/10/22 a las 11:31, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud escribió:
> 3 octobre 2022 11:11 "Santiago Ruano Rincón" a écrit:
> > El 02/10/22 a las 20:42, Michael Biebl escribió:
> >> Am 02.10.22 um 20:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> >> On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> In Bullseye we chan
On 03/10/2022 at 01:00, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Plus, as Shengjing Zhu points out: we already expect people to manage
the sources.list anyway on upgrades.
People that just have 'stable' in their sources.list haven't had to
do any
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ovn-bgp-agent
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://opendev.org/x/ovn-bgp-agent
* License : Apache-2.0
Program
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Not even replace "stable/updates" with "stable-security" during the upgrade
> from buster to bullseye ?
Hmm I don't recall but I suppose it just wasn't very memorable to do it.
At least it would have given an error fetching the lis
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 12:26:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:53:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > >What's the plan for upgraded systems with an existing
> > >/etc/apt/sources.list.
> > >Will the new n-f-f section added on upgrades automatically(if non-free was
>
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Plus, as Shengjing Zhu points out: we already expect people to manage
the sources.list anyway on upgrades.
We also try to avoid silent install problems that might or might not
result in a system that doesn't boot properly.
On 10/3/22 02:23, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:33:20AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
I can live with an APT hook warning me if I have non-free but not
non-free-firmware, but I would prefer to even do without that.
In addition, how about distributing the firmware in both
El 03/10/22 a las 19:40, Shengjing Zhu escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 7:31 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> >
> > 3 octobre 2022 11:11 "Santiago Ruano Rincón" a
> > écrit:
> > > El 02/10/22 a las 20:42, Michael Biebl escribió:
> > >> Am 02.10.22 um 20:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> > >> On Sun,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 11:32 PM Santiago Ruano Rincón
wrote:
> > Can we have different versions in each section?
> >
> > + non-free/pkgA version~1
> > + non-free-firmware/pkgA version~2
>
> that wouldn't comply with the current policy:
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#the-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yadd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-postcss-modules
Version : 5.0.0
Upstream Author : Alexander Madyankin
* URL : https://github.com/madyankin/postcss-modules
* License : Expat
Program
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:23:57AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If we limit the problem to avoiding build failures in cases that
> upstream does not support, there would be the trivial solution of
> having a package ship Provides like:
> - architecture-is-64bit
> - architecture-is-32bit
> - archite
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fabian Greffrath
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Games Team
* Package name: woof
Version : 10.3.0
Upstream Author : Fabian Greffrath
* URL : Debian Games Team
* License : GPL-2.0+ and others
Progr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: biometryd
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : UBports Foundation
* URL : https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/biometryd/
* License : LGPL-3.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-abiosoft-readline
Version : 0.0~git20180607.155bce2-1
Upstream Author : Abiola Ibrahim
* URL : https://github.com/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-chzyer-logex
Version : 1.2.1-1
Upstream Author : ChenYe
* URL : https://github.com/chzyer/logex
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-chzyer-test
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : ChenYe
* URL : https://github.com/chzyer/test
* License :
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 01:06:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Packages that only build Architecture: all binary packages tend to use
> > > Build-Depends-Indep.
> >
> > Policy is quite clear about that being a bug. I think a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-flynn-archive-go-shlex
Version : 0.0~git20150515.3f9db97-1
Upstream Author : Google Inc.
* URL : https://github.co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-abiosoft-ishell
Version : 2.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Abiola Ibrahim
* URL : https://github.com/abiosoft/ishell
* Li
27 matches
Mail list logo
