On Sun, Aug 28 2022 at 07:39:12 AM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Andreas Tille
wrote:
BTW, the vast amount of new packages I'm packaging are new
dependencies
for existing packages to get their new versions.
May be we should be able to tag packages with in NEW into categories
like this (similar to
On Mon, Aug 29 2022 at 12:33:44 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28 2022 at 07:39:12 AM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Andreas Tille
wrote:
BTW, the vast amount of new packages I'm packaging are new
dependencies
for existing packages to get their new versions.
May be
Le lun. 29 août 2022 à 03:30, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 04:56:26PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dixit:
> > >If these tests are run at build-time, errors halt the build and that
> provides
> >
> > That may not be enough, though; there are cases whe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nilesh Patra
* Package name: golang-github-marten-seemann-qtls-go1-19
Version : 0.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Marten Seemann
* URL : https://github.com/marten-seemann/qtls-go1-19
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: G
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: satellite-gtk
Version : 0.2.7
Upstream Author : Teemu Ikonen
* URL : https://codeberg.org/tpikonen/satellite/
* License : GPL-3+
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gnss-share
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Clayton Craft
* URL : https://gitlab.com/postmarketOS/gnss-share
* License : GPL-3+
Progra
On 2022-08-28 12:14 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> However, GObject-Introspection has worked approximately the way it
> currently works since at least 2008, and was apparently fine.
Something of an aside from the current debate, but GObject
introspection introduced significant problems with cross-
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained
> since 2015 [2][3].
>
> The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to
> nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python st
kilobyte dixit:
>Funny thing: there's not a single release architecture that's both
>bad-endian and supports X (they do build X related packages because the
>dependency graph is quite dense, but there are no users). So this
Meh. Remote X, X forwarding over SSH, VNC and RDP servers exist.
So do d
Hi!
On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 15:38:08 +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> It seems like the proposal went mostly unnoticed. Any comments,
> ideas, anything?
I at least read it, and it looked great. But…
> Most importantly, I need a green light from the current pkg-config
> maintainer (Tollef) to proceed
Sean Whitton wrote on 27/08/2022 at 20:24:55+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 695B7AE4BF066240 created at
> 2022-08-27T20:24:55+0200 using RSA]]
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 27 Aug 2022 at 04:22PM +02, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2022-08-27 15:53, M. Zhou wrote:
>>
>>> That's why I still
On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 12:33 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> May be we should be able to tag packages with in NEW into categories
> like this (similar to how a DD can give back a failed build via web
> interface). This may need to go through a GR. If we prioritize packages
> in NEW required for u
On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 11:58 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Something of an aside from the current debate, but GObject
> introspection introduced significant problems with cross-compiling
> because the introspection process produces different results when done
> on different architectures so you couldn't j
13 matches
Mail list logo
