Hi,
no need to file the suggested bug reports against
Am Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>pngmeta
Fixed and adopted by Debian Phototools team.
>pngnq
Fixed and adopted by Debian Phototools team.
>libimage-metadata-jpeg-perl
Fixed and adopted by Debia
Hi Adrian,
Am Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:42:42PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I think that we should reduce the number of packages using the 1.0 format,
> > as
> > (1) format 3.0 has many advantages, as documented in
> > https://wik
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: openjph
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : aous72 (github)
* URL : https://github.com/aous72/OpenJPH
* License : BSD-2
Programming Lang: C++
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:39:04AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Andreas,
> Am Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:42:42PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
>...
> > lintian already warns or has info tags that should be upgraded to warning,
>
> I absolutely agree here.
>
> > and then there will be s
On 08/03/22 at 16:11 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:39:04AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > Am Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:42:42PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> >...
> > > lintian already warns or has info tags that should be upgraded to warning
Hi Adrian,
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2022-03-07 22:42:42)
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >...
> > I think that we should reduce the number of packages using the 1.0 format,
> > as
> > (1) format 3.0 has many advantages, as documented in
> > https://wiki.debian.org/
Hi Adrian,
Am Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:11:02PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> >
> > I agree that there is no real urgency for immediate action - but this
> > seemed to be the case for other bugs on the packages I've touched the
> > case as well.
>
> what time frame do you have in mind when you writ
Hi,
you might have noticed that the adduser package has gained some momentum
in the last week, thanks to a new volunteer helper, Jason Franklin, who
has taken care of the actual code. I am acting as advisor and Debian
specialist in this team and am currently doing bug triage.
For the people who d
On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 at 17:49:04 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> (2)
> #774046 #520037
> Which special characters should we allow for account names?
>
> For system-accounts, I'd like to stick to ASCII letters, numbers,
> underscores.
ASCII letters, numbers, underscores and dashes (U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS),
On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 at 17:49:04 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> (3)
> #625758
> --disabled-password just does not set a password for the newly created
> account (resulting in '*' in shadow) while --disabled-login places a '!'
> in shadow. On modern systems with PAM, both variants seem to be
> identical,
> "Marc" == Marc Haber writes:
Marc> Hi, you might have noticed that the adduser package has gained
Marc> I have some issues that I would like to solicit the opinion of
Marc> my fellow DDs and to reach rough consensus about some changes
Marc> that have been requested from Addu
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 18:31:48 +, Simon McVittie
wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 at 17:49:04 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> (2)
>> #774046 #520037
>> Which special characters should we allow for account names?
>>
>> For system-accounts, I'd like to stick to ASCII letters, numbers,
>> underscores.
>
>AS
On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 12:29 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > > >
> Take a look at https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/pam/-/merge_requests/3
>
> According to the history of that patch, we have some old consensus to
> move toward usergroups and a default umask of 0002 (except for root
> which gets 0022
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:10:44PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
>...
> So now we have 364 source packages for which we have a patch and for which we
> can show that this patch does not change the build output. Do you agree that
> with those two properties, the advantages of the 3
I support the 0700 on home directories.
On March 8, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> "Marc" == Marc Haber writes:
Marc> Hi, you might have noticed that the adduser package has gained
Marc> I have some issues that I would like to solicit the opinion of
Marc> my fellow DDs
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:45:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>...
> 1/ the arguments about using patches to track changes to upstream code.
> Among the ~600 packages in that potential MBF, there are still many that
> make changes to upstream code, which are not properly documented. I
> believe t
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:49:04PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>...
> (2)
> #774046 #520037
> Which special characters should we allow for account names?
>
> People demand being able to use a dot (which might break scripts using
> chown) and non-ASCII national characters in account names. The regex
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergio de Almeida Cipriano Junior
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, sergios...@riseup.net
* Package name: python3-flask-dance
Version : v5.1.0
Upstream Author : David Baumgold
* URL : https://github.com/singingwolfboy
On 3/8/22 10:49, Marc Haber wrote:
(1)
#202943, #202944, #398793, #442627, #782001
The bug reporters are requesting the default for DIR_MODE to be changed
from 0755 to 0700, making home directories readable for the user only.
Policy 10.9 states that directories should be 0755, but the policy
edit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robin Jarry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-txrequests
Version : 0.9.6
Upstream Author : Pierre Tardy
* URL : https://github.com/tardyp/txrequests
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming L
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:18 PM Richard Laager wrote:
>
> On 3/8/22 10:49, Marc Haber wrote:
> > (1)
> > #202943, #202944, #398793, #442627, #782001
> > The bug reporters are requesting the default for DIR_MODE to be changed
> > from 0755 to 0700, making home directories readable for the user only.
Hello,
On Sun 06 Mar 2022 at 01:28pm -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> If you're going to omit the ones in the last category, I think you should
> also omit the ones in the none/no/yes category, since they may be packages
> that intermittantly have changes and are similarly using a VCS-based
> workflow
Hello,
On Tue 08 Mar 2022 at 04:45pm +01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 1/ the arguments about using patches to track changes to upstream code.
> Among the ~600 packages in that potential MBF, there are still many that
> make changes to upstream code, which are not properly documented. I
> believe that
Meh... an interesting package name.
On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 20:29 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 7 March 2022 18:33 +01, Adam Borowski:
>
> > > lumin highlights matches to a specified pattern (string or
> > > regular
> > > expression) in files, using color. This is similar to grep with
> > > co
24 matches
Mail list logo
