Bug#1006834: ITP: aeonbits-owner -- API to handle application configuration through Java properties file

2022-03-06 Thread Pierre Gruet
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian med team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org * Package name: aeonbits-owner Version : 1.0.12 Upstream Author : Luigi R. Viggiano * URL : http://owner.aeonbits.org/ * License : B

proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

2022-03-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, There are 629 packages in bookworm that use source format 1.0. That's 1.9% of bookworm packages. I think that we should reduce the number of packages using the 1.0 format, as (1) format 3.0 has many advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2) this contributes

Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

2022-03-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 06, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I think that we should reduce the number of packages using the 1.0 format, as > (1) format 3.0 has many advantages, as documented in > https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2) this contributes to > standardization of packaging practices, lowering the bar

Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

2022-03-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Lucas Nussbaum writes: > The breakdown in terms of packages count is: > patch_system | direct_changes | vcs | count > --++-+--- > dpatch | no | no | 3 > quilt| no | no |26 > quilt| no | y

Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

2022-03-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Lucas, thanks for doing this MBF! I agree with the other two replies and have another thing to add: On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I propose to file bugs using the following template, and make them Severity: > serious after a month (minimum). > > --