Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Grant
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wsdd
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Steffan Christgau
* URL : https://github.com/christgau/wsdd
* License : MIT License
Programming Lang: Pyt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: csound-plugins
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Csound Developers
* URL : https://github.com/csound/plugins
* License : LGPL
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:45 PM Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> I recommend thinking about how to generate an existing debian/copyright
> file and putting the SPDX-formatted one in a different location. You're
> going to want to decouple the new work from any transition that requires
> other people change
provide build in easy feedback-communications to digest, collect,
analyze user's needs and progress from there
(more security, stability and faster boot is laways better X-D (in that
order))
aka: what is REALLY needed (comes per installed per default) and what is
optional/can be installed by
Linus: the (GPL 2.0) intented social contract is: “i give you
sourcecode, give me back your changes”
https://dwaves.de/2022/01/31/why-is-it-gnu-linux-and-not-just-linux-linus-talking-about-gpl-v3-vs-gpl-v2-the-better-one-the-social-gpl-contract-is-i-give-you-sourcecode-give-me-back-your-changes-
hi,
so Stephan Lachnit submitted an MR for developers-reference on Monday to
document how to grant DM upload permissions, which I gladly merged, even
though I was aware of "#653399: developers-reference: Please include a
paragraph about Debian Maintainers (DM)" still being unresolved.
Which lead
Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-02-10 11:59:11)
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:36 PM Jonas Smedegaard
> wrote:
> >
> > For starters, the format adds one SHA1 hash per source file, right?
>
> Yes, one checksum per file.
>
> > Sure I can "just" ignore all FileChecksum: lines, but anyone working
> > wi
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:07:24PM +0100, dude wrote:
> provide build in easy feedback-communications to digest, collect, analyze
> user's needs and progress from there
>
> (more security, stability and faster boot is laways better X-D (in that
> order))
>
> aka: what is REALLY needed (comes per
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:14:40PM +0100, dude wrote:
> Linus: the (GPL 2.0) intented social contract is: “i give you sourcecode,
> give me back your changes”
>
> https://dwaves.de/2022/01/31/why-is-it-gnu-linux-and-not-just-linux-linus-talking-about-gpl-v3-vs-gpl-v2-the-better-one-the-social-gpl-
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 11:59:11 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> No, you don't have to master SPDX! That's the point: you don't
> interact with it at all. It's created by tools, and shipped to satisfy
> the legal obligation to provide copyright information.
So, are you saying this is something you
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:49 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> So what do you all think?
>
> I'm leaning towards explaining the basics in devref (mostly by copying bits
> from the wiki page) and adding a pointer to the wiki page, but if there's
> consensus that the wiki page is supposed to be made obso
On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 at 08:59:23 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> From my point of view, treating something like other common classes of RC
> bugs
> means that the project is producing tools and processes to make detection of
> such bugs more automated to remove them from the archive, that develop
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:10 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 11:59:11 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> > No, you don't have to master SPDX! That's the point: you don't
> > interact with it at all. It's created by tools, and shipped to satisfy
> > the legal obligation to provide
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 8:26:23 AM EST Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 at 08:59:23 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > From my point of view, treating something like other common classes of RC
> > bugs means that the project is producing tools and processes to make
> > detection of
On 2022-02-10 at 09:06, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2022 8:26:23 AM EST Simon McVittie wrote:
>> I think the copyright file is doing several things which are perhaps in
>> conflict:
>> * It's a place to reproduce information that licenses require us to, like
>> a compreh
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 9:13:29 AM EST The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-02-10 at 09:06, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 10, 2022 8:26:23 AM EST Simon McVittie wrote:
> >> I think the copyright file is doing several things which are perhaps in
> >> conflict:
> >>
> >> * It's a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net
* Package name: golang-github-mdlayher-dhcp6
Version : 0.0~git20190311.2a67805
Upstream Author : Matt Layher
* URL : https
> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
Holger> So what do you all think?
Holger> I'm leaning towards explaining the basics in devref (mostly
Holger> by copying bits from the wiki page) and adding a pointer to
Holger> the wiki page, but if there's consensus that the wiki page
> "Andrey" == Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
Andrey> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:53:49PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>> > > I've added "We should have a default standard packaging
>> workflow": > >
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/grow-your-ideas/-/issues/24 >
>> This should in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net
* Package name: golang-github-bettercap-nrf24
Version : 0.0~git20190219.aa37e6d
Upstream Author : Simone Margaritelli
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Badia
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: synadm
Version : 0.33.1
Upstream Author : J0J0 T
* URL : https://github.com/JOJ0/synadm
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red
Hat into airlock X-D
https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Red-Hat-into-airlock
Boldly Going, Running Linux in Space" - Sam Bishop (LCA 2022
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Porte
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
deb...@microjoe.org
* Package name: python-dt-schema
Version : 2022.01
Upstream Author : Devicetree Specification
* URL : http://www.devi
Hi,
On 2/10/22 6:55 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Over time, if people see the value in migrating toward something more
people understand, the probability of people seeing the value and
migrating increases.
What we are absolutely missing is a workflow for software that does not
have well-defined re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Agathe Porte
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
deb...@microjoe.org
* Package name: python-rfc3987
Version : 1.3.8
Upstream Author : Daniel Gerber
* URL : https://pypi.org/project/rfc39
On 2022-02-10 21:39 +0100, dude wrote:
> International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat into
> airlock X-D
>
>
> https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Re
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1216 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 189 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
Holger Levsen dijo [Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:49:05AM +]:
> hi,
>
> so Stephan Lachnit submitted an MR for developers-reference on Monday to
> document how to grant DM upload permissions, which I gladly merged, even
> though I was aware of "#653399: developers-reference: Please include a
> para
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:45:42PM +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2022-02-10 21:39 +0100, dude wrote:
> > International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat
> > into
> > airlock X-D
> >
> >
> > https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source
It IS noice. I know change is inevitable, yada, yada... I ran Centos 5
and 6 for around 10 years and thought I had found the One. I could make
those suckers tap dance around Windows. Centos 7 went totally off the
rails, and here I be.
Don't forget...
On 2/10/22 3:39 PM, dude wrote:
>
> Intern
30 matches
Mail list logo
