Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ana Custura
* Package name: golang-gitlab-yawning-edwards25519-extra
Version : 0.0~git20211229.2f91fcc-1
Upstream Author : Yawning Angel
* URL : https://gitlab.com/yawning/edwards25519-extra
* License : BSD-3
Programmi
Am Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:39:09AM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> Various people have different reactions to and opinions about the
> necessity of this review, which I understand and which is great for
> broadening the discussion. But I feel like we're starting to lose track
> of my original poi
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 8:23:36 AM EST Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:39:09AM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> > Various people have different reactions to and opinions about the
> > necessity of this review, which I understand and which is great for
> > broadening the discussi
Hello everybody,
I don't have the time to keep samba, cifs-utils and [related] packages
in good shape, and I don't use it anymore as file server or AD/DC (I
only use it as domain member and cifs client).
[related]
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-samba-maint%40lists.alioth.debian.or
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> We should have a single web service that is able to handle all those
> workflows and provide all the inputs that each team needs to make their
> decision. It should have a nifty web interface (including with
> authentication and restricted access for embargoed security u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: handsome_feng
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jianfen...@ubuntukylin.com
* Package name: ukui-notebook
Version : 3.1.0
Upstream Author : lixin
* URL : https://github.com/ukui/ukui-notebooks
* License : GPL-3
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be
On Tue, 08 Feb 2022, David Bremner wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> > We should have a single web service that is able to handle all those
> > workflows and provide all the inputs that each team needs to make their
> > decision. It should have a nifty web interface (including with
> > authent
Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> I fully expect such a service to have an API that can be used to build
> a command line interface for people like you.
Yep, but I already don't use the various things like that for e.g. salsa
or github because it's too much hassle to set up for too little
benefit. Sim
Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-01-26 12:49:34)
> - What is an SPDX bill of materials?
> It is a machine-readable format that specifies the licenses of each
> file in tag/value style like DEP-5. However compared to DEP-5 it is
> much less human readable, i.e. it includes much more meta information,
>
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:39:36 AM EST Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-01-26 12:49:34)
>
> > - What is an SPDX bill of materials?
> > It is a machine-readable format that specifies the licenses of each
> > file in tag/value style like DEP-5. However compared to DEP-5
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be inte
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> However, there's no easy way to identify what are the most popular ideas
> of improvements that Debian ought to make. We know of the
> "grow-your-ideas" project on Salsa, but it's far from exhaustive:
I spent a couple of hours to put my own wis
Hi Jonas,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> I am sceptical towards this proposal.
>
> An important feature to me with current machine-readable format is that
> really it is machine-and-human-readable.
Thank you for your input! I'm aware of this concern, however I think
i
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:53:22 PM EST Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:00 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Since Debian policy requires verbatim copies of licenses (or links to
> > /usr/
> > share/common-licenses), I think any policy compliant debian/copyright will
> > have to
The easy solution would just be allow both. Either only a single file with
verbatim text or an SPDX document with licenses in a separate folder.
Regards,
Stephan
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022, 19:12 Scott Kitterman, wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:53:22 PM EST Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> > On Tue, F
Technically it would be the simplest, but there's a process for policy changes
that's more involved than writing emails to d-devel. I'm suggesting you
engage with it on this topic if you want the results of your work to be usable
in Debian.
Scott K
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:27:19 PM EST
Hi Stephan,
Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-02-08 18:53:22)
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jonas Smedegaard
> wrote:
> >
> > I am sceptical towards this proposal.
> >
> > An important feature to me with current machine-readable format is
> > that really it is machine-and-human-readable.
>
> Th
Scott Kitterman writes:
> Technically it would be the simplest, but there's a process for policy
> changes that's more involved than writing emails to d-devel. I'm
> suggesting you engage with it on this topic if you want the results of
> your work to be usable in Debian.
Speaking as a Policy E
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 2:38:29 PM EST Russ Allbery wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes:
> > Technically it would be the simplest, but there's a process for policy
> > changes that's more involved than writing emails to d-devel. I'm
> > suggesting you engage with it on this topic if you want the
Stephan Lachnit writes:
> It would require a minor change: putting the verbatim license texts in a
> single file is not possible anymore. But I don't why just copying the
> licenses to "/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/licenses/LICENSE" in addition to the
> SPDX formatted debian/copyright would be any wors
Hi,
Release Team member hat on, but not speaking on behalf of the team. I
haven't consulted anybody on the idea I mention below.
On 08-02-2022 14:59, Scott Kitterman wrote:
If people want licensing and copyright issues to be treated like other RC
bugs, I think the first step is to treat them
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 2:45:18 PM EST Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Release Team member hat on, but not speaking on behalf of the team. I
> haven't consulted anybody on the idea I mention below.
>
> On 08-02-2022 14:59, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > If people want licensing and copyright is
Russ Allbery writes:
> I can tell you from prior experience with DEP-5 that 3 is wildly
> controversial and will produce the most pushback. There are a lot of
> packagers who flatly refuse to even use the DEP-5 format, and (pace
> Jonas's aspirations) I don't expect that to change any time soon.
Guys, once again we had a complaint about forcing people to waste their time
on copyright matters then wait months or years for review of said matters
-- just for the discussion degenerate into a proposal to bring even MORE
copyright into our life!
> - What is REUSE?
> The REUSE specification [1]
Adam Borowski writes:
> Guys, once again we had a complaint about forcing people to waste their
> time on copyright matters then wait months or years for review of said
> matters -- just for the discussion degenerate into a proposal to bring
> even MORE copyright into our life!
To be very clear,
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> docker images probably can move earlier as they don't have
> as much interactive users that use tools that might be broken
> (e.g. software-properties).
I didn't see any open disagreement in this thread (apologies if I
missed it elsewhere), and I think this makes sense
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benedikt Wildenhain (BO)
* Package name: golang-github-amalfra-etag
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Amal Francis
* URL : https://github.com/amalfra/etag
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libnet-amqp-rabbitmq-perl
Version : 2.40009
Upstream Author : Mark Ellis Michael Stemle Jr.
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Net-AMQP-Rabbit
31 matches
Mail list logo
