Re: Automated copyright reviews using REUSE/SPDX as alternative to DEP-5

2022-01-27 Thread Stephan Lachnit
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:39 AM Phil Morrell wrote: > > TLDR: I think REUSE.software is a bad idea that is worse than what > Debian already invented with Machine-readable debian/copyright file. I > guess if upstream uses it, there's no reason not to ignore that as a > source of copyright assertio

Bug#1004432: ITP: cloud-enum -- Enumerate public resources in cloud

2022-01-27 Thread Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, guilherme@gmail.com * Package name: cloud-enum Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : initstring * URL : https://github.com/initstring/cloud_enum * Lice

Bug#1004434: ITP: python-rangehttpserver -- SimpleHTTPServer with support for Range requests

2022-01-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman * Package name: python-rangehttpserver Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Dan Vanderkam * URL : https://github.com/danvk/RangeHTTPServer * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description

Work-needing packages report for Jan 28, 2022

2022-01-27 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1218 (new: 1) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 193 (new: 5) Total number of packages reques

Bug#1004462: ITP: node-should-sinon -- Sinon.js assertions for should.js

2022-01-27 Thread Torrance, Douglas
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Doug Torrance X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dtorra...@piedmont.edu * Package name: node-should-sinon Version : 0.0.6 Upstream Author : Denis Bardadym * URL : https://github.com/shouldjs/sinon * License : Ex

Unplanned freeze?

2022-01-27 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi, I just observed that many of my packages that are currently in unstable are not migrating because of | Not touching package due to block request by elbrus (Follow the freeze | policy when applying for an unblock) where the "freeze policy" is linked to the bookworm Freeze Timeline (?). f.e.

Re: Unplanned freeze?

2022-01-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 07:53:02AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I just observed that many of my packages that are currently in unstable > are not migrating because of > > | Not touching package due to block request by elbrus (Follow the freeze > | policy when applying for an unblock) > > where t

Re: Unplanned freeze?

2022-01-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/28/22 07:53, Ole Streicher wrote: Hi, I just observed that many of my packages that are currently in unstable are not migrating because of | Not touching package due to block request by elbrus (Follow the freeze | policy when applying for an unblock) where the "freeze policy" is linked to