Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-tcolorpy
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Tsuyoshi Hombashi
* URL : https://github.com/thomb
Hi,
when checking UDD dashboard for the Debian Med team[1] I see lots of
debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In debian/watch no matching files for
watch line http://sf.net/
expressions. I suspect that this affects all packages hosted at
SourceForge. When running uscan manually on my loc
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:15 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> However, my point was that I want to know what policy ftpmaster applies
> to new binary names and to focus on this topic. I really want to know
> that policy of ftpmaster and I really would like to see that documented
> and I'm afraid that
Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 06:50:17PM -0500 schrieb Theodore Y. Ts'o:
>
> So could the Release Team figure out a way to automatically rebuild
> packages that have source dependencies on static libraries?
>
> This would solve the problem of new binary packages causing a full
> ftpmasters policy revie
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:49:19PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:15:30AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > its surely an interesting topic how to avoid binary name changes and its
> > also interesting to discuss ABI changes and workarounds.
> >
> > However, my poin
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:50:01AM +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:15 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > However, my point was that I want to know what policy ftpmaster applies
> > to new binary names and to focus on this topic. I really want to know
> > that policy of ftpm
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:36:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when checking UDD dashboard for the Debian Med team[1] I see lots of
>
>debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In debian/watch no matching files
> for watch line http://sf.net/
>
> expressions. I suspect that this aff
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:31:01AM +0100, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
>
> As part of an upcoming survey that we are preparing, we plan to ask
> Debian developers to rank, by order of importance, the most popular
> ideas of improvements for Debian.
>
> That's where you come into play: it would be ni
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Luca Boccassi"
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: package-notes
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : various
* URL : https://github.com/systemd/package-notes
* License : CC0-1.0
* Programming Lang: Sh
❦ 21 January 2022 09:51 -05, M. Zhou:
> I'd rather propose choice C. Because I to some extent understand
> both sides who support either A or B. I maintain bulky C++ packages,
> and I also had a little experience reviewing packages on behalf of
> ftp-team.
I didn't comment at first because I tho
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2022-01-25 21:38:01)
> I didn't comment at first because I thought someone else would raise
> the idea. But it seems people still like the idea of a NEW queue. Not
> me. The NEW queue is a hindrance.
For the record, I don't "like" the NEW queue.
I don't like current copy
❦ 25 January 2022 21:51 +01, Jonas Smedegaard:
>> I didn't comment at first because I thought someone else would raise
>> the idea. But it seems people still like the idea of a NEW queue. Not
>> me. The NEW queue is a hindrance.
>
> For the record, I don't "like" the NEW queue.
>
> I don't like
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> I just don't think the solution is to ignore copyright or licensing
> statements.
That's not the goal. The question, which keeps being raised in part
because I don't think it's gotten a good answer, is what the basis is for
treating copyright and licensing bugs differ
Hi Russ,
> > I just don't think the solution is to ignore copyright or licensing
> > statements.
>
> That's not the goal. The question, which keeps being raised in part
> because I don't think it's gotten a good answer, is what the basis is for
> treating copyright and licensing bugs differently
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
* Package name: golang-inet-netstack
Version : 0.0~git20211120.8aa80cf2-1
Upstream Author : inet.af
* URL : https://github.com/inetaf/netstack
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description :
Hello,
The cloud team wants to make folks aware of a possible change to the cloud
images. The team plans to register a new domain, debian.cloud, for mirrors
inside of cloud provider infrastructure. For such mirrors, sources.list will
look like:
deb http://.debian.cloud/debian/ bullseye main
H
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:47:49 -0800, Ross Vandegrift
wrote:
>The cloud team wants to make folks aware of a possible change to the cloud
>images. The team plans to register a new domain, debian.cloud, for mirrors
>inside of cloud provider infrastructure. For such mirrors, sources.list will
>look l
Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:45:11PM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> > I just don't think the solution is to ignore copyright or licensing
> > statements.
>
> That's not the goal. The question, which keeps being raised in part
> because I don't think it's gotten a good
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:25:18AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:47:49 -0800, Ross Vandegrift
> wrote:
> >The cloud team wants to make folks aware of a possible change to the cloud
> >images. The team plans to register a new domain, debian.cloud, for mirrors
> >inside of cloud
19 matches
Mail list logo
