On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 07:53:20 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Implementations with real /bin /sbin /lib* directories and symlink farms
> are not useful because they would negate the major benefits of
> merged-/usr, i.e. the ability of sharing and independently updating
> /usr.
Yes, that major bene
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 02:29:02 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 12:34:18 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > I am going to compile shell.efi from source.
> >
> > I whish to install to something stable, but I need an arch triplet
> > in order to put in a multiarch (like) locatio
Le vendredi 13 août 2021, 00:29:02 UTC Guillem Jover a écrit :
> On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 12:34:18 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > I am going to compile shell.efi from source.
> >
> > I whish to install to something stable, but I need an arch triplet
> > in order to put in a multiarch (like) loca
On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 07:53 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Implementations with real /bin /sbin /lib* directories and symlink farms
> are not useful because they would negate the major benefits of
> merged-/usr, i.e. the ability of sharing and independently updating
> /usr.
>
Indeed, it would be
Le mercredi 11 août 2021, 09:16:10 UTC Simon McVittie a écrit :
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 15:19:10 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > > I suppose that [EFI] will be x86_64-efi-none (or maybe
> > > x86_64-windows-efi ) and i686-uefi-none ?
>
> It's certainly not x86_64-w
On Aug 13, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Yes, that major benefit that is completely broken by design and
> unsupported anyway, because /etc and /var can also easily get out
> of sync. If you rely on this then you are on your own anyway…
You say so, but it is a fact that in practice it works really well
Hi,
upload processing on the main archive has been ⏸d in anticipation of
some planned "maintenance" tomorrow related to ◎. Processing might
resume tomorrow in the late evening or, more likely, on 🌞day (UTC).
It is safe to upload packages intended for 📚🪱 (but keep in mind that
transitions should
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 04:42:51AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 3:22 AM Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> > Debian is missing KDE's Amarok music manager.
>
> Amarok was removed as it required the obsolete Qt 4 library. Now that
> upstream has finally ported it to Qt5, it could
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 03:31:02PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> For example, there are those of us who think that the downsides of the
> combination of 3.0 (quilt) and patches stored unapplied in git are
> significant, and so we have made attempts to provide alternatives, such
> as git-debrebase.
9 matches
Mail list logo
