Bug#982792: ITP: pytest-cases -- Separate test code from test cases in pytest.

2021-02-14 Thread nicoo
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: nicoo X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: pytest-cases Version : 3.2.0 Upstream Author : Sylvain Marié, Schneider Electric Industries * URL

Re: libgcc-s1 buster -> bullseye upgrade issues

2021-02-14 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 19:52:10 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > [The release team are] pretty concerned about a couple of known RC bugs > which need the proper attention of people familiar with upgrade paths > as there's potential to leave upgrading systems unbootable and/or > without a working apt. ..

Bug#982809: ITP: dodge-the-creeps -- Dodge the Creeps! tutorial game for the Godot engine

2021-02-14 Thread beuc
Package: wnpp Owner: pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: dodge-the-creeps Version : 3.2 Upstream Author : http://kidscancode.org/contact.html * URL : http://docs.godotengine.org/en/lates

Re: libgcc-s1 buster -> bullseye upgrade issues

2021-02-14 Thread Phil Morrell
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 04:58:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 19:52:10 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > [The release team are] pretty concerned about a couple of known RC bugs > > which need the proper attention of people familiar with upgrade paths > > as there's potential

Re: Re: Split Packages files based on new section "buildlibs"

2021-02-14 Thread Stephan Verbücheln
The same applies to the GNOME/GTK stack, where Flatpak is the way to go for active development. libgtk-3-dev is really only for building Debian packages from their point of view, too. But at least GNOME has scheduled releases which enable Debian stable to maintain it, while npm, pip, gems, cargo e

investigating autopkgtest failures

2021-02-14 Thread Nick Black
I managed to push an update [0] that unexpectedly died in autopkgtests [1]. I'm thankful that the tests brought this problem to light, and grateful for the bug report--chalk it up as a nice win for autopkgtests! I'm now pondering how best to track this down, however, and at something of a loss. So

Re: investigating autopkgtest failures

2021-02-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 06:18:12PM -0500, Nick Black wrote: > I managed to push an update [0] that unexpectedly died in > autopkgtests [1]. I'm thankful that the tests brought this > problem to light, and grateful for the bug report--chalk it up > as a nice win for autopkgtests! I'm now pondering h

Re: investigating autopkgtest failures

2021-02-14 Thread Nick Black
Antonio Terceiro left as an exercise for the reader: > I can trivially reproduce your autopkgtest failure locally with: > > $ autopkgtest -apt-upgrade --no-built-binaries growlight -- \ > lxc --sudo autopkgtest-unstable-amd64 Beautiful, thank you so much Antonio! > Now, your tests are full