Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sophie Brun
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, sop...@freexian.com
* Package name: python-prison
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : 2019 Beto Dealmeida
* URL : https://github.com/betodealmeida/python-rison
* License
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:28:42 +0100, Ben Hutchings
wrote:
>On Sun, 2021-01-17 at 11:31 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:58:33 +, "Andrew M.A. Cater"
>> wrote:
>> > Video drivers: we have some basic video modes that work for text mode on
>> > nearly all cards / embedded chips
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 06:03:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I mentioned this before, this does not look specific to whatever
> method to do merged-/usr, instead this seems like a general dpkg
> problem related to missing fsync() on the directories during unpacks
It's great news that someone has
On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 23:46 -0500, SDA wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:42:02AM -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > SDA wrote:
> > > Incidently now that this is under discussion - whomever is supplying the
> > > non-free live images should know that the torrents of the stable version
> > > aren't se
[bcc: {openssl,ca-certificates}@packages.d.o]
Hi,
the ca-certificates package is currently "Priority: optional", like most
of the archive. It's Recommended by a bunch of packages, Depended on by
an equivalent number, but I'm not sure if this is optimal. I suspect
most packages can be configured
On Jan 21, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So I'd like to raise the priority of ca-certificates from optional to
> at least standard, as a signal that it should be installed on
Good idea: I think that "standard" is appropriate.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 09:40 -0500, SDA wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 04:14:20AM -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 23:46 -0500, SDA wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:42:02AM -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > > > SDA wrote:
> > > > > Incidently now that this is under discussion
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020, at 13:09, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 3. Computers that do support MMX and SSE2, but do not support 64bit.
The "Centrino" Pentium-M that you can find on a reasonably lot of still-working
ThinkPads (the T4x series and similar X/R series of the time), for example.
Note that this is
Marco d'Itri writes:
> On Jan 21, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> So I'd like to raise the priority of ca-certificates from optional to
>> at least standard, as a signal that it should be installed on
> Good idea: I think that "standard" is appropriate.
I agree.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:10:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> And which of standard or important made most sense (AIUI, standard
> means "installed by default in d-i" and important means "installed by
> default in debootstrap").
wget is already Priority: standard and recommends ca-certificates
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Georges Khaznadar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pampi
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : pascal.pe...@free.fr
* URL : https://gitlab.com/edleh/pampi
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:06 -0500, SDA wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:55:10AM -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > >
> > > Got them from this url:
> > > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/10.7.0-live+nonfree/amd64/bt-hybrid/
> > >
> > > I'm using a VPN, su
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:18 -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:06 -0500, SDA wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:55:10AM -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Got them from this url:
> > > >
> > > > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: luma.led-matrix
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Richard Hull and contributors
* URL : https://github.com/rm-hull/luma.led_matrix
* License : MIT
Hi Norbert,
First of all, please accept my apologies for responding late. I
subscribe to d-d but filter lists for later perusal. Thanks to Lucas
Nussbaum for pointing me here!
Due to the number of messages already posted in this thread, I will
respond—with the best of ability—to each message sepa
Hi Lucas,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:31 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> I agree that a service that provides an overview of the status regarding
> lintian for the whole archive would be useful (for example, to identify
> packages that need some area of work inside a team).
This functionality is not
Hi Pierre-Elliott,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:00 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>
> As I said on that time, I'd be glad to provide help and
> support should Felix feel the need for some.
I do not recall our most recent exchanges as quite so positive, but I
would be happy to read you into some of
Hi Raphaël,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 3:27 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> From my (relatively remote) point of view, ci.debian.net seems really
> very basic in terms of features related to scheduling of jobs.
Inspired by an early peek into your own ideas of a codenamed piece of
vaporware I wrote wh
Hi Antonio,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:43 AM Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> My hope is that this, and other use cases, could be enabled by
> collaborating on existing infrastructure, instead of creating yet
> another one.
I totally agree with you. I would like to spend some time looking at
your code
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1189 (new: 9)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 217 (new: 11)
Total number of packages reque
Le 21 janvier 2021 23:51:55 GMT+01:00, Felix Lechner
a écrit :
>Hi Pierre-Elliott,
>
>On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:00 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>>
>> As I said on that time, I'd be glad to provide help and
>> support should Felix feel the need for some.
>
>I do not recall our most recent excha
Hi Felix,
thanks for your email, and no worry about sending it late, we are all
volunteers.
> Due to the number of messages already posted in this thread, I will
> respond—with the best of ability—to each message separately.
Thanks, I will only go into answer those items that I find here.
> Tha
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:12:58PM -0500, Calum McConnell wrote:
> Any way you can give us more info about that error? some log files, or the
> exact torrent file you're seeding with (ie, upload the file itself)?
> Calum
It appears to be on my end - I tried the same torrent files on a workstation
On 15/01 03:30, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> This boils down to a debate over whether the Debian community values
> convenience over ideals.
This is not about convenience, it's about being able to install Debian
on real hardware or not. Without firmware, the installer does not do the
only thing it is s
24 matches
Mail list logo
