On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 00:47 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/17/20 12:36 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > * snapshot could gain a re-signing service (#763419)
>
> That would be absolutely awesome. Whom do I throw my money at?
It doesn't seem too complicated to implement and could be devel
Hi Ansgar!
On 12/17/20 11:02 AM, Ansgar wrote:
> Maybe the same could be done for archive.d.o?
>
> I might be interested to experiment with this as it seems reasonably
> small project to implement. :-)
That would be fantastic and a huge improvement in user experience.
Adrian
--
.''`. John P
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> 4/ analyze what yarn/npm would do during build, and translate that into
> existing Debian Nodejs packages and actual need for custom work. In the
> JavaScript team we use this page as starting point for analyzing large
> projects: https://wiki
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (2020-12-17 13:16:14)
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > 4/ analyze what yarn/npm would do during build, and translate that
> > into existing Debian Nodejs packages and actual need for custom
> > work. In the JavaScript team we use this page as starting po
Hello,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> >1/ download all the node modules and add them to the source package, but
> >then it's just impossible to write a copyright file to document the source
> >package. That would be the best option though, the yarn.lock file
> >effectively locks a ve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dtorra...@piedmont.edu
* Package name: r-cran-sets
Version : 1.0.18
Upstream Author : David Meyer
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=sets
* License : GPL
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:19 pm, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>1/ download all the node modules and add them to the source
package, but
>then it's just impossible to write a copyright file to document
the source
>package. That would be the b
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, I have run your script on the package.json file of
> > greenbone-security-assistant and this just confirms that it's not
> > realistic to package everything separately:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/gsa
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:55 pm, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
I know this, but I also know that such an analysis is very
time-consuming
and needs a good knowledge of the language and of the upstream
package,
which I don't have.
Most of the time Semantic Versioning works (https://semver.org) s
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (2020-12-17 14:55:11)
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > In reality, most Nodejs modules declare too tight versioning for
> > their
> [...]
>
> I know this, but I also know that such an analysis is very
> time-consuming and needs a good knowledge of the la
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carsten Schoenert
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: arduino-core-avr
Version : 1.8.3
Upstream Author : Arduino
* URL : https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-avr
* License : BSD-3-clause, Expat,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:55:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>...
> By trying to shoehorn node/go modules into Debian packages we are creating
> busy work with almost no value. We must go back to what is the value
> added by Debian and find ways to continue to provide this value while
> accepti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: komposter
Version : 0+git20201216
Upstream Author : Noora Halme, Trilkk/Faemiyah, Adrien Destugues
* URL : http://ko
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1179 (new: 4)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 211 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:03 AM Ansgar wrote:
> (Bonus points if this keeps the original signature if possible.)
Two separate signatures is possible for Release+Release.gpg, just
rename the latter to .old, but what can you do for InRelease? Is it
possible to have multiple signatures in one b
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 01:15 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:03 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
> > (Bonus points if this keeps the original signature if possible.)
>
> Two separate signatures is possible for Release+Release.gpg, just
> rename the latter to .old, but what can you do fo
I was wondering whether glibc 2.32 is expected to land in
Bullseye. I'm guessing not, as I don't see a 2.32+ upload in
experimental.
In that case, I'd really like to have the Unicode 13 support
introduced by 2.32 (if not the complete support, at least the
wcwidth() elements). These seem pretty sel
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > - ensurance that we use DFSG free code only
> > => we can have tool to review licenses of what has been
> > downloaded during build and embedded in the binary packages
>
> Then there would not be any value for Debian with such a scenario as people
18 matches
Mail list logo
