Bug#968593: ITP: tuxedo-backlight-control -- Minimal Linux distro CLI & UI for TUXEDO / Clevo computers Keyboard Backlight

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kevin Van Lierde * Package name: tuxedo-backlight-control Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Kevin Van Lierde * URL : https://github.com/webketje/tuxedo-backlight-control * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Descr

Re: epoch bump for babl and gegl libraries

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >... > Historically, versions of these packages were shipped by the third-party > deb-multimedia.org apt repository. That would have been fine, except that > the maintainer(s) of deb-multimedia.org added an epoch to their versions. > I

Re: The "which -s" flag

Hi, 在 2020-08-17星期一的 20:47 +0200，Erik Gustafsson写道： > I took Teemus very good suggestion and changed [-a] to [-as] now :) > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debianutils/-/merge_requests/6/diffs#ed04ff4dabf1e2d4cd6b89136c2b24dec27ecca4_21_24 > > Is there anything more I should change? > > Who c

Bug#968602: ITP: qmenumodel -- Qt binding for GMenuModel

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel * Package name: qmenumodel Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Marius Gripsgard Mike Gabriel Canonical Ltd. * URL : https://github.com/AyatanaIndicators/qmenumodel/ * License

Bug#968619: ITP: libnss-nis -- NSS module for using NIS as a naming service

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Aurelien Jarno X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-gl...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libnss-nis Version : 3.1 Upstream Author : Thorsten Kukuk * URL : https://github.com/thkukuk/libnss_nis * License

Bug#968624: ITP: torrequest -- simple Python interface for HTTP(s) requests over Tor (Python 3)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net * Package name: torrequest Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Erdi Aker * URL : https://github.com/erdiaker/torrequest * L

Bug#968631: ITP: sherlock -- Find usernames across social networks

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net * Package name: sherlock Version : 0.0~git20200817.1d4cb32 Upstream Author : Sherlock Project * URL : https://github.com/s

Bug#968632: ITP: libnss-nisplus -- NSS module for using NIS+ as a naming service

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Aurelien Jarno X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-gl...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libnss-nisplus Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Thorsten Kukuk * URL : https://github.com/thkukuk/libnss_nisplus * License

Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?

Hi, I'm wondering why Vcs-* fields in debian/control (Vcs-Browser and/or Vcs-) are not recommended (or maybe even strongly recommended) ? (I mean here that I think having Vcs-* fields should be recommended for active packages) There is no lintian tag for missing Vcs-* fields (not even a low se

Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:10:04PM +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > I'm wondering why Vcs-* fields in debian/control (Vcs-Browser and/or > Vcs-) > are not recommended (or maybe even strongly recommended) ? (I mean here that > I think > having Vcs-* fields should be recommended for active packages)

Bug#968644: ITP: python-authlib -- Python library for OAuth and OpenID Connect servers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefano Rivera X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-authlib Version : 0.14.3 Upstream Author : Hsiaoming Yang * URL : https://authlib.org/ * License : BSD-3 Programming Lang: Python Desc

Re: Proposal: Allowing access to dmesg for users in group adm

Hi, Ansgar writes: > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 15:50 +1200, Matthew Ruffell wrote: >> I propose that we restrict access to dmesg to users in group 'adm' like so: >> >> 1) CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT=y in the kernel. >> 2) Following changes to /bin/dmesg permissions in package 'util-linux' >>

Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:18:08AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:10:04PM +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > > I'm wondering why Vcs-* fields in debian/control (Vcs-Browser and/or > > Vcs-) > > are not recommended (or maybe even strongly recommended) ? (I mean here > >