Re: Handling Japanese new era "令和 (Reiwa)"

2019-05-07 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On May 7, 2019 at 3:45AM +0900, henrich (at iijmio-mail.jp) wrote: >> I've noticed that Japan renews its era from 平成 (Heisei) to 令和 (Reiwa) >> (U+32FF) at 1st May and it's necessary to update some packages to deal >> with it. > > Status update... I updated the mhc package (schedule managemen

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git"): > Sam Hartman writes: > > OK, I didn't hear that as an answer but think I'm coming to the same > > conclusion that Ian did after reading your mail. > > It sounds like you are talking about hav

Bug#928604: ITP: soscleaner -- Python application to clean sensitive and un-wanted data from an existing sosreport

2019-05-07 Thread Eric Desrochers
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eric Desrochers * Package name: soscleaner Version : v0.4.3 Upstream Author : jduncan * URL : https://github.com/jduncan-rva/soscleaner * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Python Description : Python application

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure Ian> when upstream moves from tarballs to git"): >> Sam Hartman writes: > OK, I didn't hear >> that as an answer but think I'm coming to the same > conclusion >> that Ian did

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 11:01 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > That said, I think Ansgar has some really valid points. I think that > dgit (or git-dpm) are the hardest work flows to teach. I think perhaps you meant `git-debrebase` rather than `dgit` throughout the remainder of your mail, since comparing

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Ansgar
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 12:51 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure when > upstream moves from tarballs to git"): > > Sam Hartman writes: > > > OK, I didn't hear that as an answer but think I'm coming to the > > > same > > > conclusion that Ian did

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Campbell writes: Ian> On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 11:01 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: >> That said, I think Ansgar has some really valid points. I think >> that dgit (or git-dpm) are the hardest work flows to teach. Ian> I think perhaps you meant `git-debrebase` rather

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git"): > I was going to argue that I thought teaching gbp pq was easier than > dgit, and that's true up until you have to update a patch. I'm sorry not to really deal with your whole mail, but this (and a

RE:Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I am also the upstream of a bunch of project. what is the right way to use dgit when upstream contain the debian directory. source format etc... thanks Frederic

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2019-05-07, Ansgar wrote: > The concept behind 3.0 (quilt) is much easier to explain: extract > tarballs, optionally apply some patches provided. With the bonus that > users who have used other distributions before might already know about > most of this which lowers barrier of entry. Impleme

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git"): > I'm aware I'm making a typing error, and speaking in generalities. I > agree that my statement is true for debrebase, but I meant the dgit > ecosystem. I don't think this "the dgit ecosystem" is

Bug#928621: ITP: xfce4-taskbar-plugin -- Windows 7 Taskbar Mimic for XFCE

2019-05-07 Thread Null Nullington
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Null Nullington * Package name: xfce4-taskbar-plugin Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Nick Schermer * URL : https://git.xfce.org/archive/xfce4-taskbar-plugin * License : GPL2 Programming Lang: C Description : Wind

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure when Ian> upstream moves from tarballs to git"): >> I'm aware I'm making a typing error, and speaking in >> generalities. I agree that my statement is true for debrebase, >> but I

Re: Looking for a technical writer to update the Debian Handbook

2019-05-07 Thread Kashif Shah
Hi All, I could also proofread or edit. Regular user and sometimes admin on my internal network of Debian boxes I use for projects / dev work. Best regards, Kashif. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:54 PM Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On 03/05/2019 12:25, Iván Alemán wrote: > > Hello Raphael, > > > > I ca

Re: Preferred git branch structure when upstream moves from tarballs to git

2019-05-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 7, 2019 8:50:57 PM UTC, Sam Hartman wrote: >> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: > >Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Preferred git branch structure when >Ian> upstream moves from tarballs to git"): >>> I'm aware I'm making a typing error, and speaking in >>> generalities. I

Bug#928632: ITP: libdevel-findperl-perl -- Perl module to find the path to the currently running perl

2019-05-07 Thread Joenio Costa
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joenio Costa * Package name: libdevel-findperl-perl Version : 0.015 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans , Randy Sims * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Devel-FindPerl * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: P

Re: Handling Japanese new era "令和 (Reiwa)"

2019-05-07 Thread NOKUBI Takatsugu
On Tue, 07 May 2019 03:45:33 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > * IME (Input Method Editor) >- anthy: not yet done. > * "Natural language processing" Japanese dictionaries >- mecab-ipadic: not yet done. unidic is still active maintained dictionary by upstream, but there are no new release.