Hello guys,
To my surprise multiple people expressed their interest in
productivity-friendly diff highlighting. So let me write a brief
summary on this topic, after some investigation.
Mattia told me privately about the alternative of diff-so-fancy:
diff a b | colordiff | diff-highlight | les
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: vim-textobj-user
Version : 0.7.6
Upstream Author : Kana Natsuno
* URL : https://github.com/kana/vim-textobj-user
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: vim
Description : Vim plugin for use
On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 at 07:41:06 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> In fact the diff-highlight (denoted
> as 'DH' below, not your favorite debhelper) shipped in the git package
> is able to produce similar result compared to diff-so-fancy (denoted as 'DSF'
> below), except for
>
> * DH doesn't mangle standard
control: reassign -1 git
control: severity -1 wishlist
control: retitle -1 please privde separated binary package for diff-highlight
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:51:14AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 at 07:41:06 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > In fact the diff-highlight (denoted
> > a
Fellow devs,
bear with me if the topic of the upcoming european copyright law (aka
§13) has been discussed in other mailing lists. As being responsible for
screenshots.debian.net I honestly am a bit worried about the
implications. As usual… IANAL.
Management summary: screenshots.debian.net is a w
Hi folks,
AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
functions).
I noticed that containerization and Linux namespaces are not number
one prio
Hi Harald,
since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@sury.org
> On 23 Mar 2019, at 13:34, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAICS there are several pack
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
> functions).
>
> I
On Mar 23, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
> functions).
I routinely use containers and namespaces with
hi,
> since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
> patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.
not every package uses systemd yet, for some systemd still calls init
scripts which do various kinds of broken things.
So thats not necessaril
10 matches
Mail list logo
