Hello,
I filed an ITP (#920912) regarding a package I'm preparing. The upstream
name for this package is "phat", which doesn't appear in the archives
from jessie to the present day. After filing the ITP and uploading my
package to mentors, I realized that there was an unrelated "phat" with a
diffe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: spaln
Version : 2.3.2b
Upstream Author : Osamu Gotoh
* URL : http://www.genome.ist.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~aln_user/spaln
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Perl
Description : splicing-
Sören please see:
https://xkcd.com/927/
/Andy
On 05/02/2019 06:20, Sören Reinecke wrote:
Dear Debian mailing list community,
I am Sören alias Valor Naram and I founded the project "goeasyLinux". I will
help to make linux more user friendly.
A short introduction to "goeasyLinux" can be foun
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-prettycode
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Gábor Csárdi
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=prettycode
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : pretty pri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-cliapp
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Gábor Csárdi
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=cliapp
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : create rich comman
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathan Carter
* Package name: mozilla-deepspeech
Version : 0.5.0-alpha.1
Upstream Author : Mozilla
* URL : https://github.com/mozilla/DeepSpeech
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : TensorF
Gard Spreemann writes ("Reusing source package name of long-removed, unrelated
package"):
> I filed an ITP (#920912) regarding a package I'm preparing. The upstream
> name for this package is "phat", which doesn't appear in the archives
> from jessie to the present day. After filing the ITP and up
Ian Jackson writes:
> Gard Spreemann writes ("Reusing source package name of long-removed,
> unrelated package"):
>> I understand that 3.3.2 of the policy mandates that I at least bump the
>> epoch, but I wanted to ask the list to make sure: is reusing the source
>> package name of an unrelate
On 2/6/19 4:31 PM, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>> Gard Spreemann writes ("Reusing source package name of long-removed,
>> unrelated package"):
>>> I understand that 3.3.2 of the policy mandates that I at least bump the
>>> epoch, but I wanted to ask the list to make sure: is
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:39 AM Gard Spreemann wrote:
> I understand that 3.3.2 of the policy mandates that I at least bump the
> epoch, but I wanted to ask the list to make sure: is reusing the source
> package name of an unrelated, long-removed package like this OK, or
> should I consider using a
Ian Jackson writes:
> There are utilities that will download all revisions of a particular
> package from snapshot.d.o and make them into a combined history.
Would you care to name those you know of? I have been searching for
something like that but I didn't find anything useful.
Regards,
Cars
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:59:40PM +0100, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > There are utilities that will download all revisions of a particular
> > package from snapshot.d.o and make them into a combined history.
>
> Would you care to name those you know of? I have been searc
Am 06.02.19 um 17:59 schrieb Carsten Leonhardt:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>> There are utilities that will download all revisions of a particular
>> package from snapshot.d.o and make them into a combined history.
>
> Would you care to name those you know of? I have been searching for
> something
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bifcl
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Bro/Zeek project
* URL or Web page : https://zeek.org/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Description : The Bro/Zeek Built-In-Functions Compiler
This is a dependency for
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: broker
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Bro/Zeek project
* URL or Web page : https://zeek.org/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Description : Bro's messaging library
This is a dependency for bro 2.6.1
Julien Cristau writes ("Re: Reusing source package name of long-removed,
unrelated package"):
> I would say reusing binary package names is usually worse than reusing
> source package names, in that it's a lot more likely to affect users.
> Sometimes it happens anyway, but IMO it's best avoided.
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhtml-tidy5-perl
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : Andy Lester
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/HTML-Tidy5
* License
Hallo debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren
Wir gewähren Darlehen in Höhe von 20.000,00 bis 5 Mio. mit einem Zinssatz
von 2%
Die Zinsen und die Laufzeiten sind sehr attraktiv (2%) und in punkto Sicherheit
beschränken wir uns auf das absolute
Minimum. Interessiert?
On 2019-02-06 21:15:38 + (+), Ian Jackson wrote:
[...]
> reusing a source package name is IMO almost never (maybe never at
> all) the right idea.
[...]
To take an example, I maintain the weather-util packages in main.
The weather-util binary package provides a /usr/bin/weather
executable b
19 matches
Mail list logo
