Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
* Package name: sesman
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Vitalie Spinu
* URL : https://github.com/vspinu/sesman/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : session manager for Emacs I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 898429 general
Bug #898429 [franz] the boot process has a delay of 2-5 minutes bevor the login
screen appears
Warning: Unknown package 'franz'
Bug reassigned from package 'franz' to 'general'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: mrtrix3
Version : 3.0~rc3+git86-g4b523b413
Upstream Author : Mrtrix3 Team
* URL : http://www.mrtrix3.org
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : diffusion-weighted
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: morbig
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Yann RĂ©gis-Gianas, Nicolas Jeannerod, Ralf Treinen
* URL : https://github.com/colis-anr/morbig
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
Hi,
I am planning to upload the package "netgen-lvs" soon (upstream name is
"netgen"). (https://bugs.debian.org/905952)
The Debian package "netgen" is something entirely different..
(https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/netgen) But both of them have the binary
"/usr/bin/netgen". My question is, what is
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> What is the recommendation? Any links to previous discussions / documents
> about
> this subject?
Policy 10.1.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
With my debian-ports hat on, let me answer the parts related to that.
First of all as a reminder, debian-ports was originally just there to
help bootstrapping an architecture and prove it meets the ftpmasters
criteria to become an official architecture. It has been used that way
for example f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: ocaml-qtest
Version : 2.9
Upstream Author : Vincent Hugot
Simon Cruanes
* URL : https://github.com/vincent-hugot/qtest
* License
On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 22:22:25 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> You will have to use your judgement as to whether a given
> combination factors constitutes neglect;
"combination of factors"?
> in case the maintainer disagrees they have only to say so (see below).
"they only have to say so"? The fo
9 matches
Mail list logo