[trimming the CC a bit; Russ and Ian read -devel]
Hello Jonathan, Andreas,
I don't think that what either of you have said is a response to the
reasons that there were for removing this optional target from Policy.
The thought driving this is that not every trick in a Debian package
maintainer's
> Git mode for uscan helps as well in many cases.
Is the git mode currently broken? I keep getting the error message
"fatal: Not a valid object name" when fetching a new release:
$ uscan --download-version 9.2.25
uscan: Newest version of jetty9 on remote site is 9.2.25, specified download
ve
Hi Sean,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:59:55AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> [trimming the CC a bit; Russ and Ian read -devel]
>
> Hello Jonathan, Andreas,
>
> I don't think that what either of you have said is a response to the
> reasons that there were for removing this optional target from Policy
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 04:40:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> > Context: I have run into a few packages that used the +dfsg convention
> > without documenting what they removed from the tarball and I was not
> > able to locally update them. :(
>
> This is one of the
Hi,
On 07/03/2018 01:20 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> How many packages are using Files-Excluded ?
1781
Using codesearch.d.o [1] to look through the debian/copyright files, then
running
curl -s https://codesearch.debian.net/results/2d02749753b89563/packages.json |
jq -r '.Packages[]' | wc -l
ge
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:20:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 04:40:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > This is one of the cases that now has a better solution and more standard
> > tools than the get-orig-source target, specifically Files-Excluded in
> > debian/cop
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:11:14PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> When the new copyright format was introduced, it was agreed there
> would be no compulsion to migrate to the new copyright format.
>
> There is nothing that prevent to add Files-Excluded stanzas to old
> format copyright files fo
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:43:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:20:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 04:40:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > >
> > > This is one of the cases that now has a better solution and more standard
> > > tools than
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ian Jackson
* Package name: libanyevent-socket-perl
Version : 7.14
Upstream Author : Marc A. Lehmann
* URL : https://metacpan.org/pod/AnyEvent::Socket
* License : Artistic / GPL1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: omegamap
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Daniel Wilson
* URL : http://www.danielwilson.me.uk/omegaMap.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : describing selectio
Hello Daniel
El 02/07/18 a las 20:04, Daniel Pocock escribió:
>
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Planet struggles to poll certain blogs (see below), including some new
> contributors.
>
> Does anybody know of workarounds these people can use until Planet is
> updated to a recent version of planet-venus?
Hello everyone!
My name is Kyle. I work at Kitware, Inc., the upstream maintainer of
the CMake buildsystem (https://www.cmake.org/) and VTK, the
Visualization Toolkit (https://www.vtk.org/). As some of you on the
Debian Science list may have heard, we are making an effort to
officially support our
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: sweed
Version : 3.2.1
* URL : https://sco.h-its.org/exelixis/web/software/sweed/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : assessment of SNPs for their evolutionary advantage
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Kyle Edwards wrote:
> Our end goal is to get both dh-cmake and VTK into Debian proper, but it
> is still in an experimental state, and there is still a lot of work to
> be done yet. We would like to get some feedback on dh-cmake, and we
> will eventually file a form
14 matches
Mail list logo
