On 2018-02-21 10:53:49 [-0800], Don Armstrong wrote:
> We basically already do this with our ZIPFILE, MSWORD, and ZIPCOMPRESSED
> rules:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/antispam/spamassassin_config/blob/master/common/virus_spam#L115
>
> Speaking on behalf of owner@, we're always looking
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-02-21 10:53:49 [-0800], Don Armstrong wrote:
> > We basically already do this with our ZIPFILE, MSWORD, and ZIPCOMPRESSED
> > rules:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/antispam/spamassassin_config/blob/master/common/virus_
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Would it work to rescrict the done/close-@ even more? Like to
> pgp-signed messages only? I'm not asking for a valid DD signatures or
> so - just any signature will do.
This has been proposed previously, but because we don't get that many
spa
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the gnome-shell-extension-caffeine
package. It's currently unmaintained upstream, so if it stops working
in a future version of GNOME Shell and I'm not able to fix it, it'll
have to be removed. I can't commit to being able to tak
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the
gnome-shell-extension-top-icons-plus package. It's currently unmaintained
upstream, so if it stops working in a future version of GNOME Shell
and I'm not able to fix it, it'll have to be removed. I can't commit to
being able
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:57:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> But assuming that we keep updates hosted on some debian.org host, do you
> think it's OK to continue to use the security tracker to track
> vulnerabilities in wheezy?
Need to be discussed with the rest of the team, I'm not really
e
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 07:05:52PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> The security tracker is fairly flexible and it should take little
> effort to setup a separate instance which is based on the main
> data/our triage efforts while acting on a local Packages file.
>
> Ideally document this process
On Thursday 22 February 2018 09:01 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> But what is "CIP"?
>>
>> My websearch did bring up "Clean In Place" and "Christelijk Intromatie
>> Platform" ...
>
> It was explained in my first mail.
>
> Civil Infrastruc
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> The security tracker is fairly flexible and it should take little
> effort to setup a separate instance which is based on the main
> data/our triage efforts while acting on a local Packages file.
>
> Ideally document this process publicly, so that ot
Recently, in Ubuntu we have discovered the following upgrade fallout.
On xenial -> bionic upgrades, upstart binary package was removed but
not purged. As it's no longer needed for the installation, and upstart
binary package is no longer shipped in bionic.
However, the conffiles are left on disk,
Hey list,
I would like to ship some example files with my package. My Makefile.am
has something to the effect of...
examplesdir=$(docdir)/examples
examples_DATA = \
$(srcdir)/Data/Examples/some_example_file \
...
EXTRA_DIST = \
$(examples_DATA) \
...
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> A couple of conffiles were /etc/X11/Xsession.d/00upstart and
> /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99upstart which assumed that upstart would be
> alwasy be available, and in bionic after the above described update
> started to error out, and prevent gdm3 from comp
Am 25.02.2018 um 23:42 schrieb Don Armstrong:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> A couple of conffiles were /etc/X11/Xsession.d/00upstart and
>> /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99upstart which assumed that upstart would be
>> alwasy be available, and in bionic after the above described update
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Are you suggesting that it should be possible to store our own data
> in another git repository and that the tracker should be easily able to
> merge the data coming from two distincts repositories ?
I've got patches somewhere that
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Basically, every package which allows to be extended by other packages
> via .d directories is affected.
>
> Take logrotated as a example and the dance e.g. rsyslog has to do in
> preinst/postrm.
Heh; I should have known that this hack already existed.
Hi Kip,
On Mon, 26 Feb. 2018, 09:34 Kip Warner, wrote:
> This installs the example files as expected in
> /usr/share/doc/foo/examples/, but I was still left to wonder what the
> best practise was given that dh_installexamples(1) exists and seems to
> want to do the same based on the contents of
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 00:04 +, Craig Small wrote:
> Not all upstream Makefiles are that good. My preference would be if
> their Makefile is doing the right thing then use that and have no
> debian/foo.examples file.
Ah, that makes sense. Since the debianization is suppose to happen
without hav
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
* Package name: pipenv
Version : 10.1.0
Upstream Author : Kenneth Reitz
* URL : https://github.com/pypa/pipenv
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : python development workf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
* Package name: pew
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Dario Bertini
* URL : https://github.com/berdario/pew
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : tool to manage multiple vir
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 04:18:45PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > So dpkg would have to remember if a conffile was removed by the admin
> > prior to the uninstallation. Doesn't sound too complicated to me, we
> > already have an obsolete flag in the stat
Paul Wise wrote:
> [3] https://salsa.debian.org/kgb-team/kg
Apologies for mangling it, the URL should have been:
https://salsa.debian.org/kgb-team/kgb/wikis/usage
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
21 matches
Mail list logo
