Re: User-installable Debian packages?

2017-07-30 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller writes: > I just had a quick look and it seems really nice, indeed! Thank you tons for > pointing that out to us. Has anybody already tried that with Debian? I am one of a few guys behind that project. Gentoo Prefix with its own libc runs on Debian very well, the exp

Bug#870130: ITP: jbuilder -- composable build system for OCaml projects

2017-07-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stéphane Glondu * Package name: jbuilder Version : 1.0~beta11 Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC * URL : https://github.com/janestreet/jbuilder * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: OCaml Description : c

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

2017-07-30 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Benda, On 30.07.17 09:37, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > Steffen Möller writes: > >> I just had a quick look and it seems really nice, indeed! Thank you tons for >> pointing that out to us. Has anybody already tried that with Debian? > I am one of a few guys behind that project. Gentoo Pre

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

2017-07-30 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller writes: > This is good to hear. While I like all that I read about Gentoo, I do > not know about how well equipped it is with packages in computational > biology [edit: I had a look at > https://packages.gentoo.org/categories/sci-biology and am impressed, > well done!]

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

2017-07-30 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 at 19:34:42 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: > As far as I can see, the easiest relocations are those modifiable in a > plain text, like configuration file, script shebang, etc. The medium > ones are ELF, with which we have tools like patchelf and chrpath, etc. > The most difficult part

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

2017-07-30 Thread Steffen Möller
On 30.07.17 13:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 at 19:34:42 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: >> As far as I can see, the easiest relocations are those modifiable in a >> plain text, like configuration file, script shebang, etc. The medium >> ones are ELF, with which we have tools like patch

Bug#870146: ITP: node-ip -- IP address utilities for node.js

2017-07-30 Thread Suman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: suman X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-ip Version : 1.1.5 Upstream Author : Fedor Indutny * URL : https://github.com/indutny/node-ip * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : IP address utilities for node.

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

2017-07-30 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Simon, Simon McVittie writes: > Flatpak's approach to this is to use bind-mounts (in a new mount > namespace set up by bubblewrap) so that the "app" (the leaf package, > together with any libraries that are bundled with it) always appears > to be installed in --prefix=/app, which can safely b

Bug#870160: ITP: golang-github-approvals-go-approval-tests -- ApprovalTests for go

2017-07-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Shengjing Zhu * Package name: golang-github-approvals-go-approval-tests Version : 0.0~git20170712.0.c1e747e Upstream Author : approvals authors * URL : https://github.com/approvals/go-approval-tests * License : Apache-2.0

Bug#870161: ITP: stendhal -- Multiplayer online adventure game with an old school feel

2017-07-30 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes * Package name: stendhal Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/stendhal * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Shell Description : Multiplay

Re: building a debian kernel package(s) for a foreign architecture

2017-07-30 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Karsten Merker wrote: > > IIRC both pbuilder and sbuild automatically set the "nocheck" > profile when crossbuilding. For crossbuilding the kernel IIRC > one needs to set a number of additional build-profiles: > > - cross > - pkg.linux.notools > - nopython > > So th

Bug#870191: ITP: golang-github-opentracing-opentracing-go -- Go platform API for OpenTracing

2017-07-30 Thread Martín Ferrari
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: =?utf-8?q?Mart=C3=ADn_Ferrari?= * Package name: golang-github-opentracing-opentracing-go Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : The OpenTracing Authors * URL : http://opentracing.io/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Golang

Bug#870195: ITP: golang-github-opentracing-contring-go-stdlib -- OpenTracing instrumentation for packages in the Go stdlib

2017-07-30 Thread Martín Ferrari
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: =?utf-8?q?Mart=C3=ADn_Ferrari?= * Package name: golang-github-opentracing-contring-go-stdlib Version : 0.0+git201705028.48e4d76 Upstream Author : opentracing-contrib * URL : https://github.com/opentracing-contrib/go-stdlib * Lice

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-30 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:08:21 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > While the bugs are annoying, what worries me more is that they were > only spotted in release builds. There had been testing versions of > live images available for multiple weeks beforehand, presumably with > the same bugs included.

Bug#870218: (no subject)

2017-07-30 Thread Yinhang Liu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yinhang Liu * Package name: libxcam Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Wind Yuan * URL : https://github.com/01org/libxcam * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : Extended camera features and

Bug#870219: ITP: libxcam -- Extended camera features and cross platform computer vision project

2017-07-30 Thread Yinhang Liu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yinhang Liu * Package name: libxcam Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Wind Yuan * URL : https://github.com/01org/libxcam * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : Extended camera features and

Re: New package split of util-linux

2017-07-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > But why should mount be Essential? It's useless in containers and chroots. > > I'm very open to making things non-essential if possible, not limited to > only m