Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Amruth Lal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-cyclist
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Mathias Buus Madsen
* URL : https://github.com/mafintosh/cyclist
* License : Expat
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rajeev R Menon
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-run-queue
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Rebecca Turner (http://re-becca.org/)
* URL : https://npmjs.com/package/run-queue
* License : IS
Hi,
It has been pointed out to me that I didn't reply to the message below.
On 06/25/17 17:42, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:05:09 +0200, Paul Gevers
> wrote:
>> Packages may provide support for removing underlying databases, but it
>> is highly recommended that the administrator is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olive Sara Thomas
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
(mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
* Package name : node-path-is-inside
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Domenic Denicola (https://domenic.me (https://domenic.me))
* URL : https://github.c
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:25:22PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > This will match any interface that has MAC address 01:23:45:67:89:ab,
> > > and will use the "foo" stanzas to configure it.
> >
> > Awesome! This sounds like the best solution so far.
As Adam discovered, there wa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Archana N
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : node-genfun
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Author : Kat Marchán
* URL : http://github.com/zkat/genfun
* License : CC0-1.0
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : fast, prototype-friend
On Sun, 2017-07-16 at 13:54 +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:25:22PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > > > This will match any interface that has MAC address 01:23:45:67:89:ab,
> > > > and will use the "foo" stanzas to configure it.
> > >
> > > Awesome! This
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Amruth Lal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-cocaine
Version : 0.5.8
Upstream Author : Jon Yurek
* URL : https://github.com/thoughtbot/cocaine
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alf Gaida
* Package name: sddm-config-editor
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Yaohan Chen
* URL : https://github.com/hagabaka/sddm-config-editor
* License : ASL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Graphical editor
Hi,
I wonder it can be that our netinst image uses a version of libisofs
which seemingly was never packaged for Debian:
$ isoinfo -d -i firmware-9.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso
CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
System id:
Volume id: Debian 9.0.0 amd64 n
Volume set id:
Publisher id:
Data preparer id: XORR
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:05:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Is our install images excepmt from our Policy that all dependencies must
> be in Debian, or am I mistaken that we have such Policy?
Do we? The Debian Policy covers only debs.
Also, dak isn't in the archive either.
--
WBR, wRAR
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2017-07-16 19:28:06)
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:05:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Is our install images excepmt from our Policy that all dependencies must
> > be in Debian, or am I mistaken that we have such Policy?
> Do we? The Debian Policy covers only deb
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 08:12:55PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Is our install images excepmt from our Policy that all dependencies must
> > > be in Debian, or am I mistaken that we have such Policy?
> > Do we? The Debian Policy covers only debs.
> > Also, dak isn't in the archive either.
Jonas wrote:
>Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2017-07-16 19:28:06)
>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:05:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > Is our install images excepmt from our Policy that all dependencies must
>> > be in Debian, or am I mistaken that we have such Policy?
>> Do we? The Debian Poli
Quoting Steve McIntyre (2017-07-16 22:14:29)
> Jonas wrote:
> >Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2017-07-16 19:28:06)
> >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:05:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> > Is our install images excepmt from our Policy that all dependencies must
> >> > be in Debian, or am I mistak
On 07/16/2017 11:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> It was just an example, however, and my real question was generally what
> governs code we distribute outside packages - i.e. our install images,
> if Debian Policy covers only packages.
I don't know if this is actually in Policy or not, but in m
On 13/07/17 12:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:17:57AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Roger Lynn wrote:
> > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="1c:1b:0d:9a:34:98", NAME="eth0"
> >
> > It's simpler to use (for example)
> >
> > # cat /etc/systemd/net
Jonas wrote:
>Quoting Steve McIntyre (2017-07-16 22:14:29)
>> Jonas wrote:
>> >Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2017-07-16 19:28:06)
>> >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:05:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >> > Is our install images excepmt from our Policy that all dependencies
>> >> > must
>> >> >
Steve McIntyre writes:
> Jonas wrote:
>> It was just an example, however, and my real question was generally
>> what governs code we distribute outside packages - i.e. our install
>> images, if Debian Policy covers only packages.
> Go argue with the Policy folks, I guess.
Speaking as one of the
Roger Lynn writes:
> /etc/systemd/network/ doesn't exist on my system. I presume I would just
> need to create it for this to work? I haven't been able to persuade
> packages.debian.org to tell me which package it belongs to.
Yeah, you just create the directory; there isn't anything included in
Dear all,
While I love and loved alioth, I know for probably newish people the
interface is somewhat ugly.
>From what I did see in https://lwn.net/Articles/724986/ it seems there
were lots of pros and cons which were discussed. I was also able to
converse with Alexander Wirt and download the surv
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 01:54:27PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:25:22PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > It is indeed Very Cool, but it might not solve one little thing:
> > iptables firewalling.
> >
> > Is that a way to trigger an ifrename using this, so th
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> While I love and loved alioth, I know for probably newish people the
> interface is somewhat ugly.
>
> >From what I did see in https://lwn.net/Articles/724986/ it seems there
> were lots of pros and cons which were discussed. I was also a
23 matches
Mail list logo
