Sorry to disturb you but I'm a low-vision person, what is the way to
answer on HN? It seems it's no longer possible.
Best regards.
Le 01/07/2017 à 17:01, Chris Lamb a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear fellow developers,
Here's what I've been getting up to as your D
Hello!
I'd like to draw peoples attention to
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/pre-depends-directly-on-multiarch-support.html
In short, please drop "Pre-Depends: multiarch-support" from affected
packages!
(Lintian suggests using ${misc:Pre-Depends} but that expands to empty
since a long time alrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsejda-eventstudio-java
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : https://www.sejda.com/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : pure Java even
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsejda-injector-java
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : https://www.sejda.com/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : lightweight depen
Hi,
Russ Allbery wrote:
>> As an user of Octave who wish to see more lzip adoption, I don't think
>> this to be fair.
> Octave's use of lzip is completely unrelated to Debian asking for xz.
> Providing xz in no way prevents Octave from also providing lzip. I think
> you are inventing a conflict
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 09:26:31PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> As discussed in #758100, I'd like to switch to using versioned Provides
> in perl/perl-base/perl-modules-5.xx for buster. I'd be interested to
> hear if anybody knows of any remaining blockers for that.
[...]
> My current thinking wou
On 2017-07-03 11:41, Maria Bisen wrote:
3- Somebody else, also from Debian, asks the upstream above to bring
back
the xz tarball
4- As a result, lzip is almost never used alone (without xz), and
Debian can
justify forever the lack of lzip support
Hi Maria,
in the example you mentioned upst
Maria Bisen writes ("Re: Please add lzip support in the repository"):
> Moreover, software errors have already killed people:
Good grief.
This conversation is:
1. determined advocacy from an external project
2. going badly
3. not capable of leading to any productive outcome
listmaster, can yo
Hi,
I recently had a problem with an upload to the archive, likely due to bad
interaction between the tooling I use to build packages and the archive
manager.
I usually build my packages using pbuilder, with SOURCE_ONLY_CHANGES=yes in
.pbuilderrc, so pbuilder will ask to generate a _source.change
(adding debian-dpkg)
I think it would be worth stepping back a moment and thinking about
why we don't have declarative machinery for things like this. (And
also about why we have ucf as well as dpkg conffile prompts.)
* There is a potential difficulty with sequencing of the
install/removal-ti
Sorry for the fail on FTP-masters email address (which also got the mail
bounced from alioth). Replying to keep threading consistent but quoting the
whole mail below).
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 14:49 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently had a problem with an upload to the archive, lik
Hi Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
> I don't get it; what exactly is the problem when upstream distributes
their
> source in multiple formats, including .xz and .lz, among others?
Please check again point 1 and 2. See below:
1- Somebody from Debian says: "if a lot of upstream tarballs start to be
nativel
2017-07-03 14:42 GMT+02:00 Maria Bisen :
> [...]
> 4- As a result, lzip is almost never used alone (without xz), and Debian can
> justify forever the lack of lzip support
>
> You need to consider all four points to understand the issue.
No, please read again the mails previous developers wrote. Lz
Yves-Alexis Perez writes ("Bad interaction between
pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master"):
> However, I recently did that for an upload targeted at stretch-security, and
> unfortunately this caused a problem on security-master, where dak couldn't
> process t
Hi Matthias,
2017-07-03 15:11 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
>
> So, lzip isn't adopted widely, that's certainly not because of Debian
> or any other Linux distribution.
>
I agree, but I thought that Debian adopting lzip could make lzip more
widely adopted; and that's why I started this thread. Now
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:47:13PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>On 26/06/2017, Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
>> If our live images are going to be good enough to meet the standards
>> that Debian users deserve and expect, we need *consistent*,
>> *sustained* involvement from a lot more people. Pleas
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:09:00PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>I'm a user and a tester, not a dev, and I know nothing (and don't
>want to know anything) about the personal politics between Debian
>developers. So that's all I'll say on that subject.
>
>To Steve's original point:
>
>First, a big THAN
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-reference
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Rich Harris
* URL : https://github.com/Rich-Harris/is-reference#readme
* License : Expat
Progr
[ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
recipients for some reason. ]
On 2017-07-03 16:00, Ian Jackson wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez writes ("Bad interaction between
pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on
security-master"):
However, I recently did
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> recipients for some reason. ]
really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due to
debhelper much less by pbuilder…
> Is the buildinfo actually p
On 07/03/2017 07:06 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
>> recipients for some reason. ]
>
> really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due to
> debhelp
On Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:38:59 +0100, Thomas Pircher
wrote:
>I don't get it; what exactly is the problem when upstream distributes
>their source in multiple formats, including .xz and .lz, among others?
That the lzip community knows that the lzipped sources will almost
never be decompressed by any
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-locate-character
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Rich Harris
* URL : https://gitlab.com/Rich-Harris/locate-character
* License : Expat
Prog
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:25:37 +0200, Maria Bisen
wrote:
>2017-07-03 15:11 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
>> So, lzip isn't adopted widely, that's certainly not because of Debian
>> or any other Linux distribution.
>
>I agree, but I thought that Debian adopting lzip could make lzip more
>widely adopted;
Matthias Klumpp wrote...
> So, lzip isn't adopted widely, that's certainly not because of Debian
> or any other Linux distribution.
The war is over, the winner is VHS.
Trying to get lzip support in wider usage is somewhat a boot-up
problem: Few people see an advantage in doing this, so it doesn'
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 19:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> > recipients for some reason. ]
>
> really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> Hi,
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:49:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to share a link to the survey res
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsejda-io-java
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : http://www.sejda.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : layer of Input/Output cla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsambox-java
Version : 1.0.34
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : http://www.sejda.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : SAMBox PDF processor
SAMB
--
*Александр Лебедев* <*downfal8*@*gmail**.com*>;<*lebed13fan*@*gmail**.**com*
>;~*|****🗝****openVPN:bgG.png**...*
***55ED6D08*.*pgp*
30 matches
Mail list logo
