Re: website maintenance

2017-05-16 Thread Michael Lustfield
>>> Our users are really complaining about our look&feel in the web I expect that less than ten people on earth would disagree with you. > Unfortunately, I don't have the web abilities (web technologies, > design, UX, whatever) that this task requires. [..] > Someone have suggested to invest a bi

Re: website maintenance

2017-05-16 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Michael Lustfield wrote: Our users are really complaining about our look&feel in the web [... blah blah ...] For some reason, the entire other chunk of this thread found it's way to my junk folder. I'm not sure why that happened but I see there's actually been

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:39:11AM +, Riku Voipio wrote: > OTOH it might just not be worth to convert all project histories into > git. Linus didn't do it for upstream kernel either. Convert the easy > cases automatically and leave the rest ones for maintainers as an > opportunity to do a clean

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-16 Thread Stéphane Aulery
Le 16/05/2017 03:47, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:17:40AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote: Yes, Debian is a community like another, and a community is build with shared principles. Design isn't principle, it is just a shameful exploitation of the idea of beauty, serving

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 16 മെയ് 2017 05:20 രാവിലെ, Sean Whitton wrote: > Thank you for updating us, Alex. > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> - Git Hosting - we want to give pagure [1] a try, which uses gitolite, which >> is a >> nice git solution. > > Ah, that's nice. > >

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 15 May 2017, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The contents of the Gentoo homepage is similar to what Debian has but > presented with a different CSS - something like that would be a good > improvement. I took a look at the Gentoo website and there's more than just better CSS. I find it much better t

Bug#862725: ITP: python-parse-type -- Extends the parse module

2017-05-16 Thread Brian May
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Brian May * Package name: python-parse-type Version : 0.3.4 Upstream Author : Jens Engel * URL : https://github.com/jenisys/parse_type * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Extends the pa

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-16 Thread Игорь Пашев
2017-05-15 13:12 GMT+03:00 lumin : > Especially look at the homepage of Gentoo It's ugly, seriously.

Bug#862726: ITP: printer-driver-oki -- printer driver for OKI Data printers

2017-05-16 Thread Balint Reczey
Package: wnpp Owner: Balint Reczey Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: printer-driver-oki Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Oki Data Corporation * URL : https://github.com/rbalint/printer-driver-oki * License : GPL-2.0

Bug#862727: RFP: libjasper -- JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime library

2017-05-16 Thread Adam Cecile
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: libjasper Version: 2.0.12 Upstream: Michael David Adams License: JasPer License Description: This package has been scheduled for removal after Stretch release but is very important to me as it can be used

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-16 Thread Zlatan Todoric
On 05/16/2017 04:56 AM, lumin wrote: >> I'll take any day a sort animations that explains things rather then >> going through forest of information to figure out what is it, but I >> guess these all are personal opinions. > A tiny bit of animations should be enough for our homepage. The style > o

Re: Bug#862727: RFP: libjasper -- JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime library

2017-05-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi, On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Adam Cecile wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > > Package name: libjasper Just keep the old naming convention please: 'jasper'. > Version: 2.0.12 > Upstream: Michael David Adams > License: JasPer Licen

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-16 Thread Wookey
On 2017-05-15 13:42 +0200, Hans wrote: > Maybe other things, that people do not know yet, which show the power of > debian, should be mentioned (I think of biggest community, best documentation, 'Best documentation' is a strong claim that I don't think many would agree with :-) Debian is many

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? - Extreme proposal No.1

2017-05-16 Thread Zlatan Todoric
So I think that we mostly agree (and this is kinda thing that goes in circle for years) that Debian web presence needs a redesign. Current Debian presence is huge and this affects us bad because - it is not possible I think for anyone to pay attention to entire web presence, so the text/docs will b

Re: Bug#862727: RFP: libjasper -- JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime library

2017-05-16 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi >> Version: 2.0.12 >> Upstream: Michael David Adams >> License: JasPer License >> Description: This package has been scheduled for removal after Stretch >> release but is very important to me as it can be used to add JPEG 2000 to >> OpenCV (many satellite images comes as JPEG 2000). The new upst

Re: Bug#862727: RFP: libjasper -- JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime library

2017-05-16 Thread Adam Cecile
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I think the CVEs have been addressed upstream but ofc, it has to be verified first. Btw, I'not involved at all in OpenCV so sadly, my biggest concern is to have a working python3 OpenCV package... Regards, Adam. On 05/16/2017 12:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Dienstag, den 16.05.2017, 13:47 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > On ചൊവ്വ 16 മെയ് 2017 05:20 രാവിലെ, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Thank you for updating us, Alex. > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > - Git Hosting - we want to give pagure [1] a try, which uses

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Boyuan Yang
在 2017年5月16日星期二 +08 下午2:51:16,Benjamin Drung 写道: > Am Dienstag, den 16.05.2017, 13:47 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > > On ചൊവ്വ 16 മെയ് 2017 05:20 രാവിലെ, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > Thank you for updating us, Alex. > > > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > >

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:11:07PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > For example, there are documentation projects like debian-reference and > debian-handbook, native packages like dpkg, apt and reportbug. In that case, > the issue tracking *should* be enabled and used. Issue tracking here will act >

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Boyuan Yang
在 2017年5月16日星期二 +08 下午3:15:31,Mattia Rizzolo 写道: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:11:07PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > For example, there are documentation projects like debian-reference and > > debian-handbook, native packages like dpkg, apt and reportbug. In that > > case, the issue tracking *should

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:25:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Right. IIRC that was said to me at Debconf16 about Debian-specific > > services (such as ci.debian.net which was the context of my question). > > Yeah, for codebases mainta

Q: Node.js on stretch

2017-05-16 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, During translation of Stretch release note, it says "Lack of security support for the ecosystem around libv8 and Node.js" https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#libv8 Then, I'm curious that what is the best way for Debian users, "how to create

Bug#862754: ITP: libhfi1 -- Userspace driver for Intel Omni-Path fabric interface

2017-05-16 Thread Brian T. Smith
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Brian T. Smith" * Package name: libhfi1 Version : 0.5-23 Upstream Author : Intel Corporation * URL : http://www.intel.com * License : GPL or BSD Programming Lang: C Description : Userspace driver for Intel Omni-

Re: Bug#862698: ITP: minecraft -- blocks to build anything you can imagine

2017-05-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Simon McVittie writes: > If this package downloads proprietary files automatically, here are some > issues that should be considered: > * minimizing amount of code run as root (downloading the Minecraft > launcher per-user is probably better - the launcher will download > Minecraft itself on

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-16 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Boyuan, On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:11:07PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I've got some different ideas. While it makes sense that packaging-only > projects on the new VCS hosting system should not enable the issue tracking > system (people should use Debian BTS instead. Pull Requests should be

Re: Bug#862698: ITP: minecraft -- blocks to build anything you can imagine

2017-05-16 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 09:58:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Another thing that would be a really neat addition to a wrapper around > Minecraft would be to run it inside a restrictive namespace by default. Yes, that's why I suggested Flatpak. It would also be possible to use a long bwrap command-l

Bug#862775: ITP: visitors -- OCaml syntax extension for object-oriented visitors

2017-05-16 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ralf Treinen * Package name: visitors Version : 20170404 Upstream Author : François Pottier * URL : https://gitlab.inria.fr/fpottier/visitors * License : LGPL 2.1 Programming Lang: OCaml Description : OCaml synta

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-16 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Arturo Borrero Gonzalez dijo [Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:42:09PM +0200]: > Hi Paul, > > I believe that what we are actually looking for is a bit of > improvement in the marketing side. > Modern and fancy things. > > The LXDE example is good on that. Is a good example on how to craft content-void we

Bug#862776: ITP: libblockdev -- library for manipulating block devices

2017-05-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Pitt * Package name: libblockdev Version : 2.6 Upstream Author : Vratislav Podzimek URL : https://github.com/rhinstaller/libblockdev * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Library for manip

Re: Bug#862775: ITP: visitors -- OCaml syntax extension for object-oriented visitors

2017-05-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > * Package name: visitors > Version : 20170404 FYI, there was already a visitors source package in Debian (RMed after jessie) so I would suggest using a less generic source name, maybe ocaml-visitors. https://packages.qa.debian.