The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

Hi there, It's been a while since I planed on writing this message. I couldn't write it because the situation makes me really sad. At this point, it starts to be urgent to post it. As for many other folks, Mirantis decided to end its contract with me. This happened when I was the most successful

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On 15 February 2017 at 13:42, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > All this to say that, unless someone wants to hire me for it (which > would be the best outcome, but I fear this wont happen), or if someone > steps in (this seems unlikely at this point), both the packaging-deb and > the faith of OpenStack p

Bug#855211: ITP: qcumber -- quality control of genomic sequences

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: qcumber Version : 1.0.5 Upstream Author : Vivi Lieu * URL : https://gitlab.com/RKIBioinformaticsPipelines/QCumber * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Python Description : quality cont

Re: [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand : > Hi there, > > It's been a while since I planed on writing this message. I couldn't > write it because the situation makes me really sad. At this point, it > starts to be urgent to post it. > > As for many other folks, Mirantis decided to end its contrac

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On 02/15/2017 07:42 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I will continue to maintain OpenStack Newton during the lifetime of > Debian Stretch though, but I don't plan on doing anything more. This > means that maybe, Newton will be the last release of OpenStack in > Debian. If things continue this way, I pro

Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

I hope they have gotten better. Last time I tried to contribute to Ubuntu's packaging effort they took over a ear to respond. On Feb 15, 2017 11:56 AM, "Allison Randal" wrote: > On 02/15/2017 07:42 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I will continue to maintain OpenStack Newton during the lifetime of

Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

Hello. The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my build environment, which is described here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/my-building-environment.txt Before I ask the Release Managers that they

Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

I'd like to add that Thomas makes the best openstack packages by far. He's been a force of nature in packaging and his attention to detail is second to none. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Haïkel wrote: > 2017-02-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand : > > Hi there, > > > > It's been a while sin

Re: [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there, > > It's been a while since I planed on writing this message. I couldn't > write it because the situation makes me really sad. At this point, it > starts to be urgent to post it. > > As for many other folks, Mirantis decided to en

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

Hi, 2017-02-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand : > > Over the last few months, I hoped for having enough strengths to > continue my packaging work anyway, and get Ocata packages done. But > that's not what happened. The biggest reason for this is that I know > that this needs to be a full time job.

Re: De-Branding of Icedove, reintroducing Thunderbird packages into Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This sounds a good idea, and may reduce any confusion out there. Paul On 15/02/17 17:35, Christoph Goehre wrote: > Hi Debian Developers and followers, > > Thunderbird is back in Debian! We also renamed other related > packages to use official nam

Re: De-Branding of Icedove, reintroducing Thunderbird packages into Debian

Thunderbird in Debian Jessie and Debian Stretch ? When ? Le 15/02/2017 à 19:18, Paul Sutton a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This sounds a good idea, and may reduce any confusion out there. Paul On 15/02/17 17:35, Christoph Goehre wrote: Hi Debian Developers and fo

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

Dear Santiago, Le 15/02/2017 à 18:26, Santiago Vila a écrit : > Hello. > > The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug > number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my > build environment, which is described here: > > https://people.debian.org/~sanv

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

Hi, > The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug > number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my > build environment, which is described here: > > https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/my-building-environment.txt did you try to diff the build output

Re: Bug#855028: ITP: fonts-sansation -- Clean, futuristic font by Bernd Montag

On 14/02/2017 10:25, Guus Sliepen wrote: >> * Package name: fonts-sansation >> Version : 1.31 >> Upstream Author : Berd Montag >> * URL : http://www.dafont.com/sansation.font >> * License : OFL-1.1 > > I don't see any mention of the OFL-1.1 for this font. In fa

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:05:51PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Dear Santiago, > > Le 15/02/2017 à 18:26, Santiago Vila a écrit : > > Hello. > > > > The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug > > number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my > >

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > Allowing packages to fail 50% of the time is interpreting Release > Policy in a somewhat twisted way. Except that your build system is far more limited than the average system used to build packages in 2017. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:38:17PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug > > number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my > > build environment, which is described here: > > > > https://people.debian.or

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:02:23PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Allowing packages to fail 50% of the time is interpreting Release > > Policy in a somewhat twisted way. > > Except that your build system is far more limited than the average

Re: De-Branding of Icedove, reintroducing Thunderbird packages into Debian

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:35:52PM -0500, Christoph Goehre wrote: > Thunderbird is back in Debian! We also renamed other related packages to > use official names, e.g. iceowl-extension -> lightning. While I stick to Iceweasel, this isn't anywhere as visible for Icedove so I'll grudgingly accept th

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

Thomas Goirand writes: > All this to say that, unless someone wants to hire me for it (which > would be the best outcome, but I fear this wont happen), or if someone > steps in (this seems unlikely at this point), both the packaging-deb > and the faith of OpenStack packages in Debian are currentl

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On 02/15/2017 07:11 PM, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-02-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand >: > > Over the last few months, I hoped for having enough strengths to > continue my packaging work anyway, and get Ocata packages done. But > that's not what hap

Re: Congratulations Phil , Federal 2017 Incentives for Home Solar Panelsm5ad

We already have solar. Sent from my iPad > On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:59 AM, GoSolarAmerica > wrote: > > gtsdpnv > CONGRATUIATlON_Phil, > > _Your_Home_May_Qualify_for_Government_Rebates_to_Go_Solar!_ > > > _Government_Subsidies_to_Go_Solar!_ > > > _Profit_From_Solar,_Save_Up_to_50%_or_More_o

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there, > Its really sad news, for both You and OpenStack & Debian. I wish you get a contract soon On the OpenStack side, I wonder if as a community we could (and if it make sense to do so) maintain only a few projects, keysto

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:48:39AM -0500, Allison Randal wrote: > > > Hopefully, Canonical will continue to maintain the other 15 (more > > core...) projects in UCA. > > Canonical doesn't have a large team for this work, but I imagine we can > handle it just fine between their team and a few volu