On 2016-11-15.00:16, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Bugs like "With Kurt's patch, apache2 crashes on startup with an invalid
> free."
> or #843988 will be a common sight on the list of RC bugs for several
> months in any scenario with OpenSSL 1.1 as default.
>
> ...
>
> 2. move the stretch release schedule
Hi
I am trying to set up a automatic PXE install of jessie on physical servers
connected to a SAN.
My problem is that multipath support seems to be very broken in jessie, and
after fixing the first problems, I am now stuck, as the install seems to
work but the server can not find its root filesyst
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2016-11-14 23:16:14)
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:10:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Marco d'Itri:
>>> On Nov 14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
And yes, I would step back and switch libssl-dev to provide
libssl1.0-dev and have libssl1.1-dev around f
On 2016-11-15 11:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
4. use libapache2-mod-gnutls?
that might work for you, but its nothing the common debian user will
do.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
GPG
On lunes, 14 de noviembre de 2016 16:51:04 ART Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > And yes, I would step back and switch libssl-dev to provide libssl1.0-dev
> > and have libssl1.1-dev around for anyone who can really do the switch.
> I would not: OpenSSL
On lunes, 14 de noviembre de 2016 22:16:25 ART Jan Niehusmann wrote:
[snip]
> (It's fine if packages which depend on libssl-dev get an RC-bug if they
> can't be compiled with OpenSSL 1.1. Packages which can't be ported
> should explicitly depend on libssl1.0-dev. That way we'll make progress
> tow
On 2016-11-15 14:43, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
I *really* disagree with that. Swtiching libssl-dev to provide
libssl1.1-dev
means that some apps/libs will get automatically recompiled and some of
them
might even not FTBFS (because for example, they are ready to use 1.1).
If
On martes, 15 de noviembre de 2016 14:52:15 ART Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 2016-11-15 14:43, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > I *really* disagree with that. Swtiching libssl-dev to provide
> > libssl1.1-dev
> > means that some apps/libs will get automatically recompiled and some of
> >
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On lunes, 14 de noviembre de 2016 22:16:25 ART Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> [snip]
> > (It's fine if packages which depend on libssl-dev get an RC-bug if they
> > can't be compiled with OpenSSL 1.1. Packages which c
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:37:01AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On lunes, 14 de noviembre de 2016 16:51:04 ART Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Nov 14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > > And yes, I would step back and switch libssl-dev to provide libssl1.0-dev
> > >
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:03:28PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote:
> On 2016-11-15.00:16, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Bugs like "With Kurt's patch, apache2 crashes on startup with an invalid
> > free."
> > or #843988 will be a common sight on the list of RC bugs for several
> > months in any scenario with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Micah Anderson
* Package name: ruby-airbrussh
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Matt Brictson
* URL : https://github.com/mattbrictson/airbrussh
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Airbrussh prett
Lots of people have posted in this thread that they see problems with
our current approach to the openssl transition.
Do the openssl maintainers have an response ?
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:31:18AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 06.11.2016, 01:12 -0200 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
> Holschuh:
> >
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, when hardware lock elision support was added to glibc
> > upstream, libpthreads was *not* changed to properly assert() this
On 15/11/16 16:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lots of people have posted in this thread that they see problems with
> our current approach to the openssl transition.
>
> Do the openssl maintainers have an response ?
I just started looking at this thread 2 minutes ago. I really don't
know where to start
FTR, I answered most questions about "why not dgit?" in the thread I
just moved to vcs-pkg-discuss only[1].
For some specific questions here:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:31:31AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> dgit can work on Ubuntu too, in a readonly mode. (It would be nice to
> make `dgit push' wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Free Ekanayaka
* Package name: obsub
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Eduard Bopp
* URL : https://github.com/aepsil0n/obsub
* License : CC0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python module that implements th
Hi
I am trying to set up a automatic PXE install of jessie on physical servers
connected to a SAN.
My problem is that multipath support seems to be very broken in jessie, and
after fixing the first problems, I am now stuck, as the install seems to work
but the server can not
find its root files
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:49:15AM +0100, Allan Jacobsen wrote:
> that mean that I will have to give up on getting jessie to install on
> multipath disks, and wait for stretch ?
From >10 Years of experience with installer issues: Yes
Once the release is out my experience is that those niche
Robie forgot this bit (I think):
[1]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/vcs-pkg-discuss/2016-November/000909.html
Cheers,
mwh
On 16 November 2016 at 05:38, Robie Basak wrote:
> FTR, I answered most questions about "why not dgit?" in the thread I
> just moved to vcs-pkg-discuss only[1].
>
On 2016-11-15 17:42:59 [+0100], Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Would the OpenSSL maintainers and/or release managers consider making a
> wiki page about the transition with the most common questions about it,
> similar to the upstream wiki but with a Debian focus?
I started one at
https://wiki.deb
On 2016-11-15 00:16:14 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And since 80% of all OpenSSL-using packages in unstable are still
> using libssl1.0.2 (binNMUs have not yet happened), all runtime
> issues observed so far are only the tip of the iceberg.
> Bugs like "With Kurt's patch, apache2 crashes on startu
Quoting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2016-11-16 00:01:06)
> On 2016-11-15 17:42:59 [+0100], Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > Would the OpenSSL maintainers and/or release managers consider
> > making a wiki page about the transition with the most common
> > questions about it, similar to the upstream wiki b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags
Version : 1+git20161025.376.0648c82-1
Upstream Author : Jesse van den Kieboom
* URL
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-jmoiron-sqlx
Version : sqlx-v1.1+git20160206.61.398dd58-1
Upstream Author : Jason Moiron
* URL : ht
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Scott Kitterman
* Package name: pdfkit
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Golovanov Stanislav
* URL : https://github.com/JazzCore/python-pdfkit
* License : MIT/Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python w
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-kisom-goutils
Version : 0.0~git20161101.0.858c9cb-1
Upstream Author : Kyle Isom
* URL : https://git
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-geertjohan-go.rice
Version : 0.0~git20160123.0.0f3f5fd-1
Upstream Author : Geert-Johan Riemer
* URL
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-cloudflare-redoctober
Version : 0.0~git20161017.0.78e9720-1
Upstream Author : Nicholas Sullivan
* URL
On 16/11/16 00:01, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-11-15 17:42:59 [+0100], Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Would the OpenSSL maintainers and/or release managers consider making a
>> wiki page about the transition with the most common questions about it,
>> similar to the upstream wiki but with
30 matches
Mail list logo
