Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: crac
Version : 2.5.0
Upstream Author : Nicolas PHILIPPE, Mikaël SALSON, a.o.
* URL : http://crac.gforge.inria.fr
* License : CeCILL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : integrated RNA-
> > #838480
> > [...]
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Is it possible to use a pointyclicky desktoppy widgety thing to reboot
> a system with runit ? I guess from your mails you use the command
> line.
> [...]
> I think if I were you I would try installing a system with runit and
> GNOME, make enough of
Hi,
On 06/10/16 11:51, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>>> #838480
>>> [...]
>>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Is it possible to use a pointyclicky desktoppy widgety thing to reboot
>> a system with runit ? I guess from your mails you use the command
>> line.
>> [...]
>> I think if I were you I would try installi
Dmitry Bogatov writes ("Re: Interface of `shutdown', 'halt', ... programs"):
> Thank you for your advice, Ian. You guessed correctly -- 'sudo init 0' is
> good enough for me and I have little knowledge about "pointy-clicky"
> things. While I can install GNOME on virtual machine (sigh) there are
>
Hi,
2016-10-06 8:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman :
>
>
> On October 6, 2016 2:04:36 AM EDT, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
>>Paul Wise, on Thu 06 Oct 2016 11:40:12 +0800, wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> > So if some of these packages is falling down, the
>>debian-ac
06.10.2016, 07:54, "Paul Wise" :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
>
>> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software libraries —
>> Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdiff). It's a tool for backward compatibility
>> analysis of API/ABI interfaces in Deb
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>...
> As frustrating as occasional removal/reintroduction cycles are, they are rare
> enough that despite the frustration when they occur it's really not worth the
> effort it would take to avoid them completely.
This assumes that
Le 06/10/2016 à 13:30, Bálint Réczey a écrit :
> Regarding dasher I did the last upload around the last freeze to keep
> it in stable
> and my plan was packaging new upstream for Stretch, but I was busy
> with other packages which require a transition thus should be ready
> this month.
>
> I'm so
Hi Andrey,
how are they related to the dpkg-gensymbols?
Would it make sense to use the symbol files with it or have it as an
alternative to dpkg-gensymbols?
* Ponomarenko Andrey [2016-10-06 15:23]:
> Anyway, it's better to run both tools on all packages at the same time and
> verify reports of
El Dijous, 6 d'octubre de 2016, a les 15:23:10, Ponomarenko Andrey va
escriure:
> 06.10.2016, 07:54, "Paul Wise" :
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
> >> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software
> >> libraries — Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdif
06.10.2016, 15:32, "Ponomarenko Andrey":
> 06.10.2016, 07:54, "Paul Wise":
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software libraries
>>> — Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdiff). It's a tool for backward
>>> co
2016-09-07 12:32 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise :
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> I think what we actually want is for the build to be self-contained.
>
> So nothing inside the build environment (defined as dpkg-buildpackage
> or debian/rules and all sub-processes) should contact a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alf Gaida
* Package name: lxqt-build-tools
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Luís Pereira
* URL : https://github.com/lxde/lxqt-build-tools
* License : LGPL-2.1+ and BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: cmake
Description
On October 6, 2016 8:51:59 AM EDT, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>...
>> As frustrating as occasional removal/reintroduction cycles are, they
>are rare enough that despite the frustration when they occur it's
>really not worth the effort it
On 2016-10-06, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
> The tools are based on different software stacks.
> The pkg-abidiff is based on ABI Compliance Checker and ABI Dumper tools
> (https://github.com/lvc)
> developed since 2009.
The ABI compliance checker is the only tool that I have tried that
actually w
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:46PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On October 6, 2016 8:51:59 AM EDT, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>...
> >> As frustrating as occasional removal/reintroduction cycles are, they
> >are rare enough th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lev Lamberov
* Package name: ace-window
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Oleh Krehel
* URL : https://github.com/abo-abo/ace-window
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : selecting a window
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 953 (new: 23)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 148 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Is there some simple way to check, when using sbuild, that the build does
> not access network ?
nsntrace could probably be used for this. I think lamby has another method too.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> how are they related to the dpkg-gensymbols?
The exported symbols of a library are part of the ABI but the purpose
of the two tools is completely different.
> Would it make sense to use the symbol files with it or have it as an
> altern
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Then I would like to ask when we must think that we need a transition for a
> the package. If these test shows a binary compatibility of 99%, do we need to
> create a need soname bump and initiate a transition?
SONAMEs are genera
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Colberg
* Package name: golang-github-hlandau-buildinfo
Version : 0.0~git20160722.0.b25d4b0
Upstream Author : Hugo Landau
* URL : https://github.com/hlandau/buildinfo
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Colberg
* Package name: golang-github-hlandau-dexlogconfig
Version : 0.0~git20160722.0.055e2e3
Upstream Author : Hugo Landau
* URL : https://github.com/hlandau/dexlogconfig
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
On 2016-10-06, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Then I would like to ask when we must think that we need a transition f=
> or a=20
> the package. If these test shows a binary compatibility of 99%, do we n=
> eed to=20
> create a need soname bump and initiate a transition?=20
Always use common s
24 matches
Mail list logo
