> > > * conntrackd & systemd are very good integrated (using libsystemd)
> >
> > I hugely support idea of dynamically loading libsystemd.
>
> Please don't, no. While I do think packages should keep sysvinit
> support as long as it continues to work and doesn't make other paths
> worse, I don't t
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:33:36AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > > I hugely support idea of dynamically loading libsystemd.
> >
> > Please don't, no. While I do think packages should keep sysvinit
> > support as long as it continues to work and doesn't make other paths
> > worse, I don't think
* Sebastian Reichel , 2016-08-27, 02:24:
rc-alert -dU `wnpp-alert | grep "^O " | cut -d' ' -f 3`
I don't think this handles the case when the RC bug was filed against a
binary package that has a different name than the source package.
Anyway, it's not like orphaned are the only packages that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-biomformat
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Paul J. McMurdie
* URL :
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/biomformat.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: GNU R
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 at 10:33:36 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > > > * conntrackd & systemd are very good integrated (using libsystemd)
> > >
> > > I hugely support idea of dynamically loading libsystemd.
> >
> > Please don't, no. While I do think packages should keep sysvinit
> > support as l
Hello,
I'm running Debian Sid 64bit inside a KVM virtual machine. The system is
an LDAP and NFS client of a Debian 8 server. This setup has been working
fine for month. At some point this week (Wednesday?) a new version
of "libc-bin" was released and I rebooted the machine afterwards.
Si
> Once per thread about systemd, I point out that dbus-daemon links to both
> libapparmor and libselinux - which results in at least one useless library
> for literally everyone with dbus installed, since "major" LSMs don't
> stack, so nobody can possibly be using both AppArmor and SELinux at the
On 26-08-16 23:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Who is this a burden for? As long as there are no RC bugs filed for
>> the orphaned packages, I don't see any a direct reason to remove
>> them. If no-one used the package, then sure, the package is really
>> useless. But if at least some people are using
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:36:12AM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>
> Package: general
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Debian developers,
>
> I am currently testing ISPConfig with Debian Jessie and Jailkit.
>
> Apparently the chrooted SSH users are not able to log on. I'm using
> Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I suggest that everybody that orphans a package makes a statement in the
> wnpp bug report on why (s)he believes orphaning is better than removal.
> If people agree with my idea here, I'll suggest a change to the
> reportbug template for orpha
❦ 27 août 2016 12:23 CEST, Andrew Shadura :
>> Today I was, once again, surprised to see how many (low popcon) orphaned
>> packages we have. I believe that orphanage is a burden to our community
>> in the sense that not all packages are picked up by a new maintainer and
>> these packages need so
Hi
On 27-08-16 13:33, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Sometimes, a package is still worthwhile even without a maintainer.
And all I ask is the original maintainer to take this into account (of
course only making an estimate for the users) when (s)he is deciding
what to do with the package.
Paul
signa
On 2016-08-27 at 06:26, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 27 August 2016 at 10:33, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
>> Like compat package, which provides libsystemd.a static library
>> and headers, that mirrors interface of libsystemd. This library
>> would forward call to actual libsystemd, if it exists and r
Hi Paul,
On 27-08-16 13:15, Paul Wise wrote:
> The long tail of less used and orphaned packages has value.
> Deletionism is bad on Wikipedia and in Debian too.
Can you also please explain WHY you have this opinion? Because I don't
understand it. I think I understand it for Wikipedia, but why for
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> And how do we balance the work it takes for those doing QA on those
> packages (for whatever reason) versus the value mentioned by Paul? As
> mentioned so often, popcon has it's value, but is definitely not the answer.
We have several
Hi!
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 13:47:15 +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> I accidentally called "dpkg-name" on some *.udeb files and they got
> renamed to .deb.
Yes, and the reasons are a bit ugly, so you might want to skip the
following paragraph…
This is the consequence of the half-assed integration of
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 07:36:02AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> There is one minor/cosmetic downside of libsystemd as currently
> provided, however: the apt-listchanges changelog.
>
> The only '*systemd*' package which I have installed is libsystemd0.
> However, whenever I dist-upgrade (which is a
Hi, Santiago. Thanks for your reply.
El sábado 27 de agosto del 2016 a las 12:07:58 +0200,
Santiago Vila escribió:
> It would be a bug, yes, but that's not a change that we made.
>
> A standard install of Debian jessie is usually made by a program
> called debian-installer. This program runs fr
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 12:07 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:36:12AM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
[...]
> > I think that jailkit just copies the permissions that Debian has set as
> > default for /bin which are different now according to the jailkit shell.
> >
> > There see
El sábado 27 de agosto del 2016 a las 12:36:47 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro escribió:
> Here I find a pattern, since the difference of permissions mentioned in
> the previous mail was found in a KVM virtual machine installed using the
> netinstall CD.
>
> But I have checked in other Jessie virtual machi
Hello all!
What is correct? 755 or 775? I have 775, and I did install from the DVD
(however, about 7 years ago!).
I never changed any permissions manually, so I believe, this settings are now
for a lng time.
Best
Hans
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath
* Package name: fonts-mononoki
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Matthias Tellen
* URL : https://github.com/madmalik/mononoki
* License : OFL-1.1
Programming Lang: font
Description : a font for progra
El sábado 27 de agosto del 2016 a las 17:37:05 +0100,
Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> fwiw I think this might be a side-effect of the issues described in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2016/03/msg00035.html and
> surrounding messages.
Hi, Adam.
Thank you for your contribution. Maybe Santi
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 07:59:32PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> What is correct? 755 or 775? I have 775, and I did install from the DVD
> (however, about 7 years ago!).
We want it to be 755, so if they end up being 775, that's a bug.
It should be harmless because /bin is owned by root, and by default
o
reassign 835516 debian-installer
thanks
I think this is a bug in debian-installer, because debootstrap is
apparently not affected by the umask setting (be it 002 or 022).
Reassigning accordingly.
Dear d-i people: Short summary: New systems installed from Debian 8
netinst image have /bin with mod
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 835516 debian-installer
Bug #835516 [general] General: Incorrect permissions on /bin for Debian Jessie
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'debian-installer'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #835516 to the same values
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> You convinced me. If I pursue simplicity, it would be better to just
> recompile packages to get rid of unwanted dependencies.
I strongly suspect the amount of time you have spent participating in this
thread already exceeds all benefit you will ever achieve from recompi
I have finally reassigned this to sed:
# dpkg -c sed_4.2.2-4+b1_amd64.deb | grep bin
drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2014-11-08 19:28 ./bin/
Holger Levsen schreef op 26-08-2016 14:16:
So, obviously from my point of view, lack of sysvinit support is not a
bug.
And policy supports your view, considering the above (*) are
"compelling
reasons" to do so.
(*) and the fact that conntrackd is linux only…
Personally I do not run a non-
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:40:03 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 26-08-16 23:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > off the top of my head:
> > - it's wasting time of anyone doing QA work
> > - it's wasting time of any user who looks for a piece of software to
> > do
> > $stuff and gets to eliminate all the
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the net-snmp package.
I was active maintainer from Jan 2013 to Apr 2015 but lost interest in it,
other members in team seems to be busy. So, someone who want to continue to
use snmp will be the maintainer is welcome.
The packa
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:33:36AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > > I hugely support idea of dynamically loading libsystemd.
> >
> > Please don't, no. While I do think packages should keep sysvinit
> > support as long as it continues to work and doesn't make other paths
> > worse, I don't think
32 matches
Mail list logo
