Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: voltron
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : snare
* URL : https://github.com/snare/voltron
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Hacky debugger UI for hacker
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 823465 general
Bug #823465 [dpkg] New binaries won't run at all on i586 Pentium MMX due to
illegal instruction
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.18.6.
Ignoring request to alter
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2016 13:04:57 +0100
with message-id <1462449897.19332.1.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Processed: Re: dpkg: Won't run at all on i586 Pentium MMX
due to illegal instruction
has caused the Debian Bug report #823465,
regarding New binaries won't run at all
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2016, 20:34 + schrieb PICCA Frederic-
Emmanuel:
> I am using fglrx-driver for OpenCL on my W5100 and W7100 amd GPUs.
> Do you know if there will be a plan in order to support OpenCL on amd
> for strech ?
That was actually also my thirst thought.
However, regar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med team
* Package name: mypy
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Jukka Lehtosalo
* URL : http://www.mypy-lang.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Optional static typing for Python
A
Dear list,
I get the following linker error building upstream lirc on sid, updated
as of today:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find /lib/
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find s/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
The link command (which builds a plugin):
$ gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/atilibusb_la-atilibusb.o -Wl,-rpath \
-
Hi,
On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 18:10 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I get the following linker error building upstream lirc on sid,
> updated as of today:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /lib/
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find s/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
I've just filed this as bug #823525 against libus
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 823465 Dropping i586 support unexpectedly breaks i586 systems on
> upgrade
Bug #823465 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [general] New binaries
won't run at all on i586 Pentium MMX due to illegal instruction
Changed Bug title to 'Dropping i586 supp
retitle 823465 Dropping i586 support unexpectedly breaks i586 systems on upgrade
stop
That's nice. That piece of information didn't get to me. I didn't read
that gcc changelog either because I haven't upgraded it on my system.
This is my production system and I run a lot of services on it. This
i
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:50:43PM +0200, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> This is my production system and I run a lot of services on it.
You are running sid on your production system, correct?
> So are there release notes somewhere?
I'm sure they will be there in the stretch release notes.
--
WBR, wRAR
On Thu, 5 May 2016 18:50:43 +0200, Pierre Ynard
wrote:
>So are there release notes somewhere?
For an unreleased development version?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse i
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:50:43PM +0200, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> This is my production system and I run a lot of services on it. This
on *unstable*?
> So are there release notes somewhere? What's the recommended course of
I don't believe there are, as the release and release notes are still
a few
retitle 823465 New binaries won't run at all on i586 Pentium MMX due to illegal
instruction
clone 823465 -1
reassign -1 release-notes
reopen -1
retitle -1 Document dropping i586 support
severity -1 important
thanks
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:28:56PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > So are there r
On Thu, 5 May 2016 22:51:47 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:50:43PM +0200, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> > This is my production system and I run a lot of services on it.
> You are running sid on your production system, correct?
>
> > So are there release notes somewhere?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 823465 New binaries won't run at all on i586 Pentium MMX due to
> illegal instruction
Bug #823465 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [general] Dropping
i586 support unexpectedly breaks i586 systems on upgrade
Changed Bug title to 'New binaries won't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon McVittie
Control: affects -1 xdg-app
* Package name: bubblewrap
Version : (no releases yet)
Upstream Author : Colin Walters, Alex Larsson
* URL : https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/
* License : LGPL-2+
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
* Package name: zenburn-emacs
Version : 2.4
Upstream Author : Bozhidar Batsov
* URL : http://github.com/bbatsov/zenburn-emacs
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : a low contra
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I'm doing something wrong, looking
for advice. If one wants to deprecate a conffile locate in an otherwise
empty directory (let's say /etc/foo/bar), the following happens at new
package install time:
- before files unpacking, new-preinst is called; from
d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni
* Package name: golang-github-fhs-go-netrc
Version : 0.0~git20160504.0.4ffed54-1
Upstream Author : Fazlul Shahriar
* URL : https://github.com/fhs/go-netrc
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Des
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 718 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 185 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:16:32AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I'm doing something wrong, looking
> for advice. If one wants to deprecate a conffile locate in an otherwise
> empty directory (let's say /etc/foo/bar), the following happens at new
> package
On 2016-05-06 11:07:57, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:16:32AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I'm doing something wrong, looking
> > for advice. If one wants to deprecate a conffile locate in an otherwise
> > empty directory (let's say
22 matches
Mail list logo
