Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

2015-12-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le mardi 22 décembre 2015, 00:35:25 Robie Basak a écrit : > I had always assumed that this is the risk you take by using autoremove > and thus you need to pay attention to what you autoremove, which is for > example why unattended-upgrades is sensible by not doing it by default. Excepted that unat

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

2015-12-22 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015, at 09:37, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > *) "apt-get remove $(deborphan)" is more dangerous; and should be done > manually; > and then one can also build fake empty packages with equivs to register > some > -libs or -devel packages as needed by a local application. Errr, why? Jus

Bug#808727: ITP: python-django-overextends -- reusable app providing circular template inheritance

2015-12-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-django-overextends Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Stephen McDonald * URL : https://github.com/stephenmcd/django-overextends * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Python D

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

2015-12-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le mardi 22 décembre 2015, 10:03:15 Ondřej Surý a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015, at 09:37, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > > *) "apt-get remove $(deborphan)" is more dangerous; and should be done > > manually; > > and then one can also build fake empty packages with equivs to register > > some > > -lib

Re: AppStream / DEP-11 support now available in the Debian archive

2015-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:24:38AM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Coming from a science background myself, I like this idea very much! :-) > However, we shouldn't add each and every metadata to the AppStream > document, so we would need to go through what the UpstreamMetadata > project o

Re: lists.debian.org: New list: debian-metad...@lists.debian.org

2015-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:27:24PM +0545, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Iain R. Learmonth (2015-12-18 01:51:31) > > Having a mailing list would greatly help with co-ordination, so please > > hit up the bug with a +1 if this is something you'd like to be > > involved in. > > I wanna be involv

Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?

2015-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 09:11:03PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Please have a look at [1]. Though if your reason for disabling them are: > > * Upload speed / personal bandwidth costs. >- Then please consider using "source-only" (or arch:all+source) > uploads, which is unaffected and ke

Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?

2015-12-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I admit I would really like to safe bandwidth - I seem to have missed > the source-only upload option. Could you provide a pointer. This would > be even cooler than the dbgsym feature. ;-) They were on d-d-a last year (arch any) and this y

Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?

2015-12-22 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Wise , 2015-12-22, 18:19: On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: I admit I would really like to safe bandwidth - I seem to have missed the source-only upload option. Could you provide a pointer. This would be even cooler than the dbgsym feature. ;-) They were on d-d-a

Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?

2015-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jakub, On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > >https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/08/msg2.html > >https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/08/msg7.html > > Reminder: Every person who was caught not reading d-d-a carefully is oblige

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

2015-12-22 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:35:25AM +, Robie Basak wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I'll repeat this one last time for you: If A suggests B, and you > > install B in some way, you may have come to rely on the fact that A is > > extended by B on yo

Bug#808764: ITP: python-csscompressor -- python port of YUI CSS Compressor

2015-12-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-csscompressor Version : 0.9.4 Upstream Author : Yury Selivanov * URL : https://github.com/sprymix/csscompressor * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#808765: ITP: python-rcssmin -- CSS Minifier

2015-12-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-rcssmin Version : 1.0.6 Upstream Author : n.d. parker * URL : https://github.com/ndparker/rcssmin * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : CSS Minifier

Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-22 Thread Marcin Kulisz (kuLa)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Marcin Kulisz (kuLa)" * Package name: apt-transport-gs Upstream Author : Dhaivat Pandit * URL : https://github.com/ceocoder/apt-gcs * License : MIT Programming Lang: go Description : APT transport for repositories private

Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?

2015-12-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:38:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >Unfortunately we have no power to push this "fix 42 RC bugs" rule - >otherwise the RC bug count would probably decrease a lot. If we had the power to push anybody to do anything, Debian would be in a much better shape. Unfortunately, the

Re: Known issues with automatic dbgsym packages (Was: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!)

2015-12-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:35:05AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > * reprepro rejects upload with automatic debug symbols as it does not >support them yet[1]. (#730572) >- Workaround #1: Build with --no-ddebs / DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noddebs >- Workaround #2: Pass --ignore=surprisingbinary t

Re: Known issues with automatic dbgsym packages (Was: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!)

2015-12-22 Thread Michael Prokop
* Lars Wirzenius [Tue Dec 22, 2015 at 06:36:55PM +0100]: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:35:05AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > * reprepro rejects upload with automatic debug symbols as it does not > >support them yet[1]. (#730572) > >- Workaround #1: Build with --no-ddebs / DEB_BUILD_OPTI

[OT] Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?

2015-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 05:11:07PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:38:26 +0100, Andreas Tille > wrote: > >Unfortunately we have no power to push this "fix 42 RC bugs" rule - > >otherwise the RC bug count would probably decrease a lot. > > If we had the power to push anybody to

Bug#808793: test, please ignore

2015-12-22 Thread Phillip Susi
Package: general This is a test of the BTS, please ignore.

Processed: your mail

2015-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 808793 gparted Bug #808793 [general] test, please ignore Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gparted'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #808793 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versio