Package: wnpp
Owner: Ole Streicher
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: photutils
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sipocz
* URL : https://g
Dear
This is Charles from China. we is a factory-direct and trust-worthy
supplier in tungsten carbide jewelry and ceramic jewelry.
Thank you for your time for reading my email, here is our new product .
please check the pictures and details we have them in stock, if you have
any inter
Greetings.
I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
This is not only a violation of policy, but also prevents the package
from being uploaded in source-only form, as the architecture-independent
packages are generated by a dedicated "Arch:
* Santiago Vila , 2015-11-23, 10:52:
I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
[...]
I think those are clearly bugs, and they should be reported. The only
thing that may be unclear is the severity. I would like this to be RC
in some not
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:29:19AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Santiago Vila , 2015-11-23, 10:52:
> >I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built using
> >"dpkg-buildpackage -A".
> [...]
> >I think those are clearly bugs, and they should be reported. The only
> >thing that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: python-pgspecial
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Amjith Ramanujam
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: python
Description : https://github.com/
On 11/23/2015 10:52 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
> using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
>
> This is not only a violation of policy, but also prevents the package
> from being uploaded in source-only form, as the architectu
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > As the number of bugs is going to be greater than ten
>
> Do you have the exact figures? How many packages are affected?
I don't have exact figures yet, but I estimate about 300, more or less.
I considered the source packages ge
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:29:19AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > I'd use "severity: serious", just like for a normal FTBFS.
>
> The problem with making them "severity: serious" is that I would be
> deciding on my own that those bugs are RC. Normally, the release team
> deci
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> “serious” severity.
>
The release team's RC policy decides which policy violations we consider
"severe" in the sense of "gets a serious severity bug".
Cheers,
Julien
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 21:53 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 21:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 20:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 12:35 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:54:51 +0100
> > > > Ben Hutchi
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> I assumed that there would have been a discussion - if only because
> adding a binary package to stable is a reasonably exceptional
> circumstance - but couldn't find one.
Why would there be a binary-only package for the hyper-v driver
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:43 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam D.
> Barratt wrote:
> I assumed that there would have been a discussion - if only
> because
> adding a binary package to stable is a reasonably exceptional
> circums
Sorry, I assume you meant binary-only in context. It was certainly not our
intent to ask for something like that.
Sorry again, --jrp
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:43 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 13:09 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> Sorry, I assume you meant binary-only in context. It was certainly not
> our intent to ask for something like that.
Ah. I'm assuming that there's been a confusion of terminology here. A
binary package in this context is a package that a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: maven-deploy-plugin
Version : 2.8.2
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: J
Santiago Vila wrote:
> I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
> using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
>
> This is not only a violation of policy, but also prevents the package
> from being uploaded in source-only form, as the architecture-independent
> packages are generated
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > “serious” severity.
This is one way that a bug can be determined “Severity: serious”, by
definition.
In other words: “severe violation
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 08:48 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > > “serious” severity.
>
> This is one way that a bug can be determined “S
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:42:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > “serious” severity.
> >
> The release team's RC policy decides which policy violations we consid
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Noam Preil
* Package name: pixeldungeon
Version : 1.0.0
* Upstream Author : Arcnor
* URL : https://github.com/arcnor/pixel-dungeon-gdx
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Traditional roguelike gam
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 17:32:31 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> As part of the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we added a
> "reproducible/timeless" feature area to dpkg which exports -Wdate-time
> via CPPFLAGS [1].
>
> In our CI infrastructure we enabled that in Spring.
>
> We now think this is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Noam Preil
* Package name: shatteredpixeldungeon
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : Evan
* URL : https://github.com/00-Evan/shattered-pixel-dungeon-gdx
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : A mod o
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> BTW, thanks for doing all this!
>
> In any case this is a heads up to note that the next dpkg upload will
> include the change requested in #805872. If anyone has concerns or
> objections, please bring them up now.
Once it happens, please m
Hello,
Most filesystems support destructive operations, with a goal to
recover data via some-sort check/repair functionality e.g. btrfs
check/rescue, xfs_repair etc.
Some filesystems also require periodic maintenance calls, e.g.
something like the `harmless' fsck on each mount.
Some filesystems
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 02:51 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> This is currently the case for xfs and btrfs, which imho is silly.
Well sooner or later, btrfs check is declared stable and then I think
we do want to have regular checks (though don't know whether this is
upstream's recommendation).
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 04:12 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> In fact, btrfs seems to be quite useful already these days...
I meant "btrfs check" ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 24 November 2015 at 03:12, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 02:51 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> This is currently the case for xfs and btrfs, which imho is silly.
> Well sooner or later, btrfs check is declared stable and then I think
> we do want to have regular c
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 03:23 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> btrfs check is a destructive tool, that can attempt repairing btrfs
> filesystem. it should not be run automatically, nor non-interractive,
> nor on each boot.
What source is that information based on?
To my knowledge, and I think I re
29 matches
Mail list logo
