Hi,
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * A request for anyone to say if they know of a reason I shouldn't do
> this.
I have to agree with Ben. A namespace differing only by the case
is not very helpful.
In DEP-14 we have already "debian/patches/" for the upstream
branch with Debian patc
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 ITP: wifi-switcher -- script to automatically switch
between networks
On Sb, 14 nov 15, 16:53:04, Oleg SHALAEV wrote:
> Package: wifi-switcher
> Severity: ITP
> License: GPL
> Section: net
>
> Motivation: I think that network-manager and wicd duplica
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 23:10:11 +0100, Wouter Verhelst
wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Regarding dpkg, its conffile handling is IMO beyond repair, it should
>> be deprecated and later removed.
>
>Could you explain why?
- It does not give maintainers the level o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: fuel-astute
Version : 7.0
Upstream Author : Mirantis
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/fuel-astute
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Deployment Orchestr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: heka
Version : 0.10.0b1
Upstream Author : Ben Bangert, Mike Trinkala, Rob Miller, Victor Ng,
David Birdsong, Michael Gibson
* URL : https://github.com/mozilla-services/he
Le lundi 16 novembre 2015, 10:27:14 Marc Haber a écrit :
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 23:10:11 +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> Regarding dpkg, its conffile handling is IMO beyond repair, it should
> >> be deprecated and later removed.
>
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:39:25 +0100, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
>But adding dynamic file support in dpkg is a lot of work.
I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving the
needed love to ucf and to deprecate dpkg's conffile functions in favor
of ucf. A extended / enhanced ucf c
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving the
> needed love to ucf and to deprecate dpkg's conffile functions in favor
> of ucf. A extended / enhanced ucf can replace dpkg with a lot less
> work than would be necessary t
[resending because my MUA messed up]
Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: git, debian/ tags, dgit - namespace
proposal"):
> Deliberately creating identifiers that differ only by case seems
> gratuitously confusing.
I acknowledge that this is a downside of my proposal. However, it is
IMO important that th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: libjs-requirejs-plugins
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Miller Medeiros
* URL : https://github.com/millermedeiros/requirejs-plugins
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Desc
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: git, debian/ tags, dgit - namespace proposal
[and 1 more messages]"):
> Colin Watson suggested (in pers.comm)
>pkg/debian/
> This is better but it still has a problem with collate order.
>
> It may seem a petty thing to worry about, but for the reasons I
> explain abo
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:02:32PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm considering:
>archive/{debian,ubuntu}/
>{debian,ubuntu}/archive/
>
> I'm still considering the capitalisation idea.
>
> Other suggestions welcome.
More of a meta-idea.
You're absolutely right in being unwilling to use "d
On 2015-11-16 13:27:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
> [resending because my MUA messed up]
>
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: git, debian/ tags, dgit - namespace
> proposal"):
> > Deliberately creating identifiers that differ only by case seems
> > gratuitously confusing.
>
> I acknowledge that this is a dow
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:11:54PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:02:32PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm considering:
> >archive/{debian,ubuntu}/
> >{debian,ubuntu}/archive/
> >
> > I'm still considering the capitalisation idea.
> >
> > Other suggest
Guido Günther writes ("Re: git, debian/ tags, dgit - namespace
proposal [and 1 more messages]"):
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:11:54PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > You're absolutely right in being unwilling to use "dgit" as part of the
> > namespace, on the basis that it is just a specific
Marc Haber writes ("Re: Ideas to improve dpkg/ucf with hooks"):
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 23:10:11 +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> Regarding dpkg, its conffile handling is IMO beyond repair, it should
> >> be deprecated and later remo
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ie, something which would allow packages to modify (in some controlled
> and reproducible way) (or even generate) the notional `as shipped'
> version.
There are at least Config::Model, augeas and (I think) Elektra (with
various levels of suppo
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:29:48 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving the
>> needed love to ucf and to deprecate dpkg's conffile functions in favor
>> of ucf. A extended / enhanced ucf can repl
I am open to suggestions.
Manoj
On November 16, 2015 9:38:23 AM PST, Marc Haber
wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:29:48 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving
>the
>>> needed love to ucf
On Nov 16, 2015, at 04:52 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>I'm leaning towards
> archive/{debian,ubuntu,...}/
>
>This is on the grounds that the tag's semantics are that the source
>code referenced by the that is what is in the specified distro
>archive, under the specified version number.
LGTM, and I th
On 17/11/15 05:52, Ian Jackson wrote:
Guido Günther writes ("Re: git, debian/ tags, dgit - namespace proposal
[and 1 more messages]"):
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:11:54PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
You're absolutely right in being unwilling to use "dgit" as part of the
namespace, on the b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Victor Seva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: lua-unbound
Version : 0.0+hg~14fd7a2875e4
Upstream Author : Kim Alvefur
* URL : https://www.zash.se/luaunbound.html
* License : Expat
Program
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #707334
Owner: Anthony Fok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
I intend to adopt Rene Engelhard's excellent sampleicc package.
Motivations:
1. To scratch my own itch: I was looking for some tools to try to
make sense of an ICM colour pro
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
> =
>
> I am planning to remove the following features/commands in debhelper in
> the near future:
>
> * compat level 1,2 and 3.
> * dh_scrollkeeper
>
> All of the listed commands do nothing except a deprecation warning.
> Please see
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 04:52 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >I'm leaning towards
> > archive/{debian,ubuntu,...}/
> >
> >This is on the grounds that the tag's semantics are that the source
> >code referenced by the that is what is in the specified distro
> >archive, under the specifi
Daniel Reurich writes ("Re: git, debian/ tags, dgit - namespace
proposal [and 1 more messages]"):
> "archive" is rather indescript and confusing too.
Sadly there's not space for an essay, and the underlying situation
(particularly, the existing use of the DEP-14 namespace) is already
confusing :-
Ian Jackson writes:
> It has nothing to do with the source format. That's the opposite of
> what this tag namespace is for. For a package and version this git
> tag refers to the source code that you'd get out of `apt-get source'
> or dpkg-source -x, _regardless_ of the source format.
Maybe I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Dmitry Smirnov
Control: block 613805 by -1
Package name: libntirpc
Version: 1.3.1
License: BSD-3-Clause
URL: https://github.com/linuxbox2/ntirpc
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debia
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
> I advocate doing things exactly the other way roud. Give package
> maintainers the power!
Why would merging ucf into dpkg remove the power from maintainers?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
usertag: ros
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging
ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses
many packages already in Debian, but also has a se
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Potter
* Package name: golang-github-natefinch-lumberjack
Version : 0.0~git20140618.0.8ec9c6b-1
Upstream Author : Nate Finch
* URL : htt
On 16/11/15 22:57, Brian May wrote:
> In what way does your use differ from the debian/ tag in
> DEP-14?
For a 3.0 (quilt) package, debian/1.2.3-4 is whichever the maintainer
finds most useful for their particular workflow, either "patches
applied" or "patches unapplied". The version with patches
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:47:33 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I advocate doing things exactly the other way roud. Give package
>> maintainers the power!
>
>Why would merging ucf into dpkg remove the power from maintainers?
Nowadays one can call ucf in
41 matches
Mail list logo
