Hi,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
=
I am planning to remove the following features/commands in debhelper in
the near future:
* compat level 1,2 and 3.
* dh_scrollkeeper
All of the listed commands do nothing except a deprecation warning.
Please see "BACKGROUND AND NUMBERS" for more informa
On 12.09.2015 21:23, Russ Allbery wrote:
Виталий Филиппов writes:
Is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5 transition? Or by something
else? Why apt-get dist-upgrade still wants to remove a lot of packages?
It lasts for several weeks, I can't upgrade normally...
I've been able to upgrade
Am Samstag, den 12.09.2015, 21:55 +0300 schrieb Виталий Филиппов:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5 transition? Or by something
> else? Why apt-get dist-upgrade still wants to remove a lot of packages? It
> lasts for several weeks, I can't upgrade normally...
There ar
On Sun, 2015-09-13 at 11:21 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 12.09.2015, 21:55 +0300 schrieb Виталий Филиппов:
>
> That's what Sid/Unstable is used for. You'll have to live with that :)
> This transition was IMHO a monster compared to the usual transitions
> and it might happen agai
Svante Signell, le Sun 13 Sep 2015 11:33:31 +0200, a écrit :
> > That's what Sid/Unstable is used for. You'll have to live with that :)
> > This transition was IMHO a monster compared to the usual transitions
> > and it might happen again. Se at the end we probably should discuss,
> > what to impro
On Sb, 12 sep 15, 23:27:48, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
>
> Maybe adding jessie into sources.list will help to calm resolver...
I'd rather suggest stretch.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00582.html
"Personally I couldn’t care less about installability problems on user’s
machines
On 2015-09-13 14:12, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
> [...]
>
> you seem to be crossing your testimony
>
> first you say "does nothing but print warning". then you talk about
> patterns not matching and removing dh_scrollkeeper which is used by any
> packaged doing update for NOT-gnome3, which is ma
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Sb, 12 sep 15, 23:27:48, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
>>
>> Maybe adding jessie into sources.list will help to calm resolver...
>
> I'd rather suggest stretch.
While helpfull with normal transitions this is basically pointless with
the GCC5 one as library packages are not
Andreas Tscharner writes:
> On 12.09.2015 21:23, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I've been able to upgrade normally during the entire gcc-5 transition.
> Lucky you!
> aptitude wanted to remove 45 packages yesterday. I spent about 5 hours to
> manually resolve dependencies by uninstalling packages, remov
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team
Control: block 797676 by -1
* Package name: pbcommand
Version : 0.2.8
Upstream Author : Pacific Biosciences
* URL : https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbcommand
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team
* Package name: dazzdb
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Eugene W. Myers, Jr.
* URL : https://github.com/thegenemyers/DAZZ_DB
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : database lib
On 2015-09-13 11:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
> =
>
> I am planning to remove the following features/commands in debhelper in
> the near future:
>
> * compat level 1,2 and 3.
> * dh_scrollkeeper
>
> All of the listed commands do nothing except a depreca
On 09/13/2015 08:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-09-13 11:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
>> =
>>
>> I am planning to remove the following features/commands in debhelper in
>> the near future:
>>
>> * compat level 1,2 and 3.
>> * dh_scrollkeeper
>>
>>
Simon Josefsson:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson writes ("Re: GNU IceCat?"):
>>> What's a good way to do that efficiently? People have submitted bugs
>>> against Iceweasel to do some of the things that IceCat does by default,
>>> for example https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
On الأحد 13 أيلول 2015 13:06, Chris Knadle wrote:
>>> If you do find that the Iceweasel maintainers are not interested
>>> >> enough in your goals, then a better engineering solution might be an
>>> >> overlay package which overrides some of the configuration defaults.
>>> >>
>>> >> (If there is
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I stopped using aptitude for routine upgrades a while back. My experience
> with aptitude is that the first solution is almost always wrong, and the
> second solution is sometimes better than the first solution that apt comes
> up with. That
Hi,
I'm announcing the formation of the Debian protobuf packaging team that
will be responsible for packaging the src:protobuf package. (And maybe
closely related packages like src:grpc, if the maintainers are
interested.)
Iustin Pop has maintained src:protobuf in the past, and I've maintained
i
On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote:
> On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote:
>
>> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>
Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide
patches against your branch to implement/fix the issues I have been
working on. It
On Sunday, September 13 2015, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> One (last?) update.
>>
>> I have upgrade/recreated the repository one more time now. Thadeu
>> Cascardo pointed me to two lintian warnings that I had not seen before
>> (they're fixed now), and I've cherry-picked Andreas's commits (those
>>
On September 13, 2015 9:33:52 PM GMT-03:00, Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
>On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote:
>
>> On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>>
> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide
> patc
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:33:52 -0400
Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >>
> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide
> patch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance
* Package name: libmpris2client
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Matias De lellis
* URL : https://github.com/matiasdelellis/libmpris2client
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library
Hi,
my upstream tagged 0.4 a year ago and I want to package the current master
commit a5e5f9e that is 24 commits after 0.4. Please assume that this makes
sense...
How would you format the upstream part of the packages version number? How
about 0.4+24+git+a5e5f9e?
The git describe output is v0
Hallo,
* Thomas Koch [Mon, Sep 14 2015, 07:51:09AM]:
> Hi,
>
> my upstream tagged 0.4 a year ago and I want to package the current master
> commit a5e5f9e that is 24 commits after 0.4. Please assume that this makes
> sense...
>
> How would you format the upstream part of the packages version nu
On 2015-09-13 21:02, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [...]
>
> still using the globbing feature for command line arguments in DH_COMPAT=2
> mode.
> Was this re-added in higher levels again?
>
> Matthias
>
Hi Matthias,
Ok, I was not aware of this feature. To be honest, I suspect it was an
artefact
Hi Thomas,
Quoting Thomas Koch (2015-09-14 07:51:09)
> my upstream tagged 0.4 a year ago and I want to package the current
> master commit a5e5f9e that is 24 commits after 0.4. Please assume that
> this makes sense...
>
> How would you format the upstream part of the packages version number?
>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:51:09AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> How would you format the upstream part of the packages version number? How
> about 0.4+24+git+a5e5f9e?
I wouldn't put the commit identifier in the package version at all. It
isn't sortable, so clearly doesn't belong in a version stri
On 09/14/2015 07:51 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my upstream tagged 0.4 a year ago and I want to package the current master
> commit a5e5f9e that is 24 commits after 0.4. Please assume that this makes
> sense...
>
> How would you format the upstream part of the packages version number? How
28 matches
Mail list logo
