Hi Vincent,
> which is unacceptable from a security and stability point of view.
do you conclude this from the package description?
> One problem is that if this package is installed, then Iceweasel
> automatically uses these plugins (even when not needed, currently
> making it crash[*]), with a
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think reading "preferred form of modification" from the perspective of
> upstream is a useful standard because it handles some edge cases like
> that, and because it feels ethically consistent with free software
> principles. The goal is th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: libjs-bootswatch
Version : 3.3.5+2+dfsg1
Upstream Author : Thomas Park
* URL : https://github.com/thomaspark/bootswatch
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Javascript, CSS, LessCSS, etc.
On Thursday 03 September 2015 10:55:22 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> * Package name: libjs-bootswatch
Apparently a duplicate of #771384...
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
The Santa myth is one of the most effective means ever devised for
intimidating children, eroding their self-esteem, twi
On Thursday 03 September 2015 08:47:11 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Please, publish your own study.
I do not need to publish any studies to be sceptical.
> This number is well known and supported
> by an entity which is likely to have a population large enough to be
> significant.
You've mentioned n
Hi,
In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small
packages problems.
What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation ?
The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to
your archive size.
Moreover if we could solve this problem we co
❦ 3 septembre 2015 21:03 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov :
>> Without minification, we'll just ship packages that people won't
>> use. Why would I run a crippled installation of Wordpress that will
>> drive of part of my users to another competitor?
>
> Sorry but that feels like exaggeration. Maybe it is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Riku Voipio
* Package name: kvmtool
Version : 20150903
Upstream Author : Pekka Enberg, Sasha Levin and others
* URL :
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/will/kvmtool.git/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang
2015-09-03 13:36 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
> Hi,
>
> In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small
> packages problems.
>
> What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation ?
>
> The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to
> y
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-ment...@lists.debian.org,
788...@bugs.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe"
* Package name: caffe
Version : 0.~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
> 2015-09-03 13:36 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small
>> packages problems.
>>
>> What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation
>> ?
>>
>> Th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: drf-fsm-transitions
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Jacob Haslehurst
* URL : https://github.com/hzy/drf-fsm-transitions
* License : Ex
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: django-downloadview
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Benoît Bryon
* URL : https://github.com/fladi/django-downloadview
* License : BSD-3-
On 03/09/15, 03:13pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I was thinking generally, perl latex python have a lot of small
> package. Each language could not come with its own solution. Maybe
> creating a tool agregating small debian package in a big one. But
> doing something only for javascript is not a
Le 03/09/2015 13:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small
> packages problems.
>
> What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation ?
>
> The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to
>
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2015-09-03 13:36:15)
> In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small
> packages problems.
>
> What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the
> situation ?
>
> The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to
> yo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathon
* Package name: jasp
Version : 0.7.1.12
Upstream Author : Jonathon Love
* URL : https://jasp-stats.org
* License : AGPL
Programming Lang: C++, JavaScript, R
Description : graphical statistical package de
Lars Wirzenius dijo [Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:32:12AM +0300]:
> However, I want to raise the point that upstreams do not always make
> sensible decisions, and if they don't, it's good to raise that with
> them. For example, there was recently an ITP bug for
> node-number-is-nan. Upstream source code
Vincent Bernat dijo [Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:47:23AM +0200]:
> If you talk about uglifyjs or the like, it is already packaged and
> doesn't solve all the problems we have (see my message to Odyx,
> ).
>
> If you talk about Grunt, Grunt comes with a lot of plugins (and does
> almost nothing without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:47:11AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Without minification, we'll just ship packages that people won't
> use. Why would I run a crippled installation of Wordpress that will
> drive of part of my users to another competitor?
Paul Wise writes:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> If *no one* has access to anything better than a binary file, then
>> possession of that binary file puts you on an equal footing with
>> everyone else in the world, which I think is all that we can reasonably
>> ask.
>
* Neil Williams [150902 14:33]:
> Minified isn't source for modification... [large snip]
I don't believe I have disagreed with anything you said in the snipped
text. I certainly did not mean to. I said that minified JS can only go
in main if both the source and the tools to build it are also in
* Bas Wijnen [150902 17:36]:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:33:57 -0400 Marvin Renich wrote:
> > > No, "A preferred form" is what upstream uses. The DFSG does not use
> > > the term "THE preferred form", and I believe that was wise.
>
> The DFSG doesn't define source at all. There seems to be conse
* Neil Williams [150902 14:15]:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:14:31 -0400 Marvin Renich wrote:
> > It is presumed that upstream already has what it considers "source";
> > in the case of this thread, that is minified JS.
>
> Actually, not. Source, for upstream of JQuery at least, is a set of
> directi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: python-cbor
Version: 0.1.21
Upstream Author: 2014-2015 Brian Olson
URL: https://bitbucket.org/bodhisnarkva/cbor
License: Apache-2.0
Description: Python Implementation of R
❦ 3 septembre 2015 17:22 GMT, Bas Wijnen :
> Because you know you have the right and the ability to be a part of the free
> software community that created the software. That is why you are running
> Debian and don't have contrib or non-free in your sources.list.
>
> From your mails it is clea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Owner: Dmitry Smirnov
Control: block 795652 by -1
* Package name: golang-gopkg-gcfg.v1 AKA golang-googlecode-p-gcfg
Version : 0.0~git20150817.0.5866678-1
Upstre
On Sep 03 2015, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 3 septembre 2015 17:22 GMT, Bas Wijnen :
>
>> Because you know you have the right and the ability to be a part of the free
>> software community that created the software. That is why you are running
>> Debian and don't have contrib or non-free in your
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Seems Osamu Aoki is working on at least part of the puzzle:
> https://bugs.debian.org/797045
Merging multiple sources *really* shouldn't be necessary. And the
metadata for those sources will vary, so that likely won't save that
much space.
Perhaps we should add a few mo
❦ 3 septembre 2015 13:19 -0700, Nikolaus Rath :
>>> Because you know you have the right and the ability to be a part of the free
>>> software community that created the software. That is why you are running
>>> Debian and don't have contrib or non-free in your sources.list.
>>>
>>> From your m
Quoting Josh Triplett (2015-09-03 22:26:12)
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Seems Osamu Aoki is working on at least part of the puzzle:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/797045
>
> Merging multiple sources *really* shouldn't be necessary. And the
> metadata for those sources will vary, so that likely won't
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 669 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 181 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paulo Kretcheu
* Package name: bangsh
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Gustavo.Dutra
* URL : https://github.com/bangsh/bangsh
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Shell Script
Description : framework for easy she
33 matches
Mail list logo
