On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Ian Jackson <
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I am pleased to announce dgit 1.0, which can be used, as applicable,
> by all contributors and downstreams.
>
> dgit allows you to treat the Debian archiv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-bandit
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/bandit
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : secur
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-oslo.cache
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/oslo.cache
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Michael Stapelberg writes ("Re: dgit 1.0, available for all users"):
> Let’s assume I want to make an improvement to a package. I’d start by
> cloning it using dgit, then I’d make my modifications, but then what?
> Typically I’d use git format-patch and send the resulting file to the
> maintainer t
Vincent Bernat writes ("Re: Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git
integration tools"):
> [Ian Jackson:]
> > Do your published git branches contain the patches-applied or
> > patches-unapplied tree ?
>
> Without using "gbp pq", the published git branches are patches-unapplied
> trees.
Then to use d
* Steve Langasek , 2015-07-29, 20:48:
Normally, such a bug is closed with 'close' rather than 'fixed'; the
difference between these two commands being *whether* to continue
showing the bug as a going concern.
Normally, you should close a bug by sending a message to
nn-d...@bugs.debian.org
Nicholas Breen wrote:
If there is just the excrement of a fly adhered to a corner of the
envelope (a null byte appended to an otherwise intact file, for
example), xz will report that the data is corrupt and will not
deliver the message. This test is inescapable.
^^
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kevin Murray
* Package name: axe-demultiplexer
Version : 0.2.8
Upstream Author : Kevin Murray
* URL : https://github.com/kdmurray91/axe
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Axe demultiplexes DNA se
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> Nicholas Breen wrote:
>>>
>>> If there is just the excrement of a fly adhered to a corner of the
>>> envelope (a null byte appended to an otherwise intact file, for
>>> example), xz will report that the data is corrupt and will not
>>> de
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> there are (unfortunately) a number of situations I encountered when sbuild
> would just hang or just fail without any sensible error message. In my case,
> the most common reason for that was that the chroot it was instructed to use
> (via the configur
❦ 30 juillet 2015 11:54 +0100, Ian Jackson :
>> > Do your published git branches contain the patches-applied or
>> > patches-unapplied tree ?
>>
>> Without using "gbp pq", the published git branches are patches-unapplied
>> trees.
>
> Then to use dgit push, you must use gbp pq.
>
> Do you see w
On Jul 29 2015, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
>> I'm looking at the bug overview page for src:python3-llfuse
>> (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=python-llfuse). The
>> first thing it lists is the apparently nasty grave bug #775056.
>
>> However, this bug only exi
On Jul 30 2015, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:45:01AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> The only think it doesn't yet do is that if
>>
>> - a is automatically installed
>> - b is automatically installed
>> - c is manually installed and depends on a|b
>>
>> Either a or b can
Hi.
Alexandre Detiste writes:
> I think nobody mentioned it, but there is already "grive"
>
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/grive .
>
>
Which Btw seems to no longer work as per #783169 [0] :-/
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783169
--
On 30/07/2015 15:56, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
On Jul 30 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Johannes Schauer wrote:
there are (unfortunately) a number of situations I encountered when sbuild
would just hang or just fail without any sensible error message. In my case,
the most common
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Elena Grandi
* Package name: python-pypandoc
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Juho Vepsäläinen
* URL : https://github.com/bebraw/pypandoc
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python wrapper for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-automaton
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/automaton.git
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:56:33 +0200, Vincent Bernat
wrote:
> ? 30 juillet 2015 11:54 +0100, Ian Jackson :
>
>>> > Do your published git branches contain the patches-applied or
>>> > patches-unapplied tree ?
>>>
>>> Without using "gbp pq", the published git branches are patches-unapplied
>>> trees
Marvin Renich wrote:
> * Josh Triplett [150729 17:18]:
> > Ole Streicher wrote:
> > > Other packages will never depend on this metapackage; they will rather
> > > depend on the individual programs.
> >
> > Other packages *in Debian* will not. I actually build a pile of
> > personal metapackages
Josh Triplett writes:
> The whole point of my metapackages is that absolutely everything
> *except* those metapackages is marked as "automatically installed".
> There's no programmatic way to distinguish between "Recommends that
> should be installed" and "Recommends that should not be installed";
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:48:25PM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
> >That doesn't mean your objections are wrong, and I certainly haven't
> >looked at it in detail. But they don't seem to be widely shared.
> It is software, a branch of mathematics, what is being discussed h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stein Magnus Jodal
* Package name: mopidy-youtube
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Janez Troha
* URL : https://github.com/dz0ny/mopidy-youtube
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Mopidy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stein Magnus Jodal
* Package name: mopidy-local-sqlite
Version : 0.10.2
Upstream Author : Thomas Kemmer
* URL : https://github.com/tkem/mopidy-local-sqlite
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Hi Ian,
I am writing a blog at MeetAdvisors.com on companies that are driving
their industries forward, I would love to include you!
I'll be looking for why you do what you, what your passion is, and to
gather a piece of advice you'd like to share with our community.
Is there a time in the comin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stein Magnus Jodal
* Package name: python-uritools
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Kemmer
* URL : https://github.com/tkem/uritools
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : RFC 3986 compli
Ole Streicher wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
> > The whole point of my metapackages is that absolutely everything
> > *except* those metapackages is marked as "automatically installed".
> > There's no programmatic way to distinguish between "Recommends that
> > should be installed" and "Recommends
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:48:25PM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> > Aggressive statement? I guess your community should change its own
> > documentation. I merely copied the description from there:
>
> > http://www.debian.org/intro/fre
On 06/13/2015 10:23 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> We use "git archive" within the PKG OpenStack team to generate this
> tarball (which is more or less the same as pristine-tar, except we use
> upstream tags rather than a pristine-tar branch). The fact that xz
> produces a different result makes it n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-oslo.reports
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/oslo.reports
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdist-zilla-plugin-metaprovides-perl
Version : 2.001002
Upstream Author : Kent Fredric
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-MetaProvides
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
P
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 794173 by -1
* Package name: libdist-zilla-util-configdumper-perl
Version : 0.003006
Upstream Author : Kent Fredric
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Dist-Zilla-Util-ConfigDumper
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 794173 by -1
Control: block 794174 by -1
* Package name: libdist-zilla-util-test-kentnl-perl
Version : 1.005012
Upstream Author : Kent Fredric
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Dist-Zilla-Util-Test
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 794175 by -1
* Package name: librecommended-perl
Version : 0.003
Upstream Author : David Golden
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/recommended
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Perl
Svante Signell writes ("Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead
of xz, archive wide"):
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > http://www.debian.org/intro/free
> > > "Truly free software is always free. Software that is placed in the public
> > > domain can
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 794175 by -1
* Package name: libdata-dpath-perl
Version : 0.53
Upstream Author : Steffen Schwigon
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Data-DPath
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 794179 by -1
* Package name: libiterator-util-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Eric J. Roode
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Iterator-Util
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libiterator-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Eric J. Roode
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Iterator
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Perl
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 678 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 181 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Hallo,
* Andrew Shadura [Fri, Jul 31 2015, 12:32:15AM]:
> On 31 July 2015 at 00:30, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Incredible, Debian does no longer adopt to the world of free software
> > (not opensource) :( I wonder how RMS feels about this?
>
> Open source is free software. Free software is open so
39 matches
Mail list logo
