On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:31:55AM +0200, Marcin M. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to package (and maintain) a small and old game called Down!, written
> in Ruby/SDL [1]. I sent an ITP using reportbug -B debian wnpp (since I'm using
> Mint 17.2), filled it out. I was to receive a confirmation but got n
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Marcin M. wrote:
> What could go wrong?
To reduce these sort of questions, I recommend having the output from
reportbug go into your usual email client and send from there.
Personally, as reportbug doesn't have direct support for my MUA, I use
a script (see below)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Marcin M. wrote:
>
>> What could go wrong?
>
> To reduce these sort of questions, I recommend having the output from
> reportbug go into your usual email client and send from there.
> Personally, as reportbug does
Am 24.07.2015 um 08:31 schrieb Marcin M.:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to package (and maintain) a small and old game called Down!,
> written in Ruby/SDL [1]. I sent an ITP using reportbug -B debian wnpp
> (since I'm using Mint 17.2), filled it out. I was to receive a
> confirmation but got no such message.
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:13:09 +0200
with message-id
<20150724111309.horde.apspofrugpeubakga297...@isengard.geekcommandos.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#793413: general: No samba config
has caused the Debian Bug report #793413,
regarding general: No samba config
to be marked as done.
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ole Streicher
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: astrometry.net
Version : 0.56
Upstream Author : David W. Hogg, Dustin Lang
* URL : http://www.astrometry.net/
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ole Streicher
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: astrometry-data-2mass
Version : 4200
Upstream Author : Dustin Lang
* URL : http://data.astrometry.net/
* License : GP
Hello Ian,
Since we are speaking about workflow.
I work with instituts who want to maintain internaly their own debian packages
and repositories.
The objectif is to maintain sort of 'PPA' in order to be as reactive as
possible when deploying the code internally.
Now from time to time it would
* Jonas Smedegaard , 2015-07-23, 21:40:
One mistake boost makes is using ":=" instead of plain "=". Contrary
to popular belief, the former almost always causes more evaluation of
$(shell) stuff, specially when dh is involved.
Could you elaborate on that?
dpkg-buildpackage -B will run debian/r
TBH, I have no idea what MTA is :)
I'll try the smtphost
Thanks :)
On 24.07.2015 10:56, Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 24.07.2015 um 08:31 schrieb Marcin M.:
Hi,
I'd like to package (and maintain) a small and old game called Down!,
written in Ruby/SDL [1]. I sent an ITP using reportbug -B debian wn
Am 24.07.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Marcin Mielniczuk:
> Tried it and now reportbug fails
Try reportbug -b wnpp. Probably a temporary server error.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Tried it and now reportbug fails
Please briefly describe this package; this should be an appropriate
short
description for the eventual package:
> A simple game written in Ruby/SDL
Your report will be carbon-copied to debian-devel, per Debian policy.
Querying Debian BTS for rep
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=76
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Marcin Mielniczuk
wrote:
> Tried it and now reportbug fails
>
> Please briefly describe this package; this should be an appropriate short
> description for the eventual package:
>> A simple game written in
OK, so I'll fetch the source from Debian, build, install it and see ;)
Thanks
On 24.07.2015 12:48, Sandro Tosi wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=76
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Marcin Mielniczuk
wrote:
Tried it and now reportbug fails
Please briefly describe t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: bookkeeper
Version : 4.2.4
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://bookkeeper.apache.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Replicate
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 657390
Bug #793404 [general] massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline
commands
793404 was blocked by: 793440 793330 793443
793404 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 793404: 657390
--
793404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Control: block -1 by 657390
[ Blocking on that, because there's currently no other such bug. So
not to imply this is lintian maintainers sole responsibility. ]
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:19:36 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> dpkg-buildpackage -B will run debian/rules 4 times: once to determine if
Now I've got:
SMTP send failure: (550, 'No valid sender found in the From:,
Sender: and
Reply-to: headers'). Do you want to retry (or else save the report
and exit)?
[Y|n|q|?]? ?
Can I simply send the generated message via my favorite e-mail client?
(The maintainer address is dif
Hi,
I would like to have the Java library jsap [1] available in Debian -
and I'm willing to package it if needed.
When I search for it directly (apt-cache search jsap, or
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/java/) I can't find it.
However, when I use a search engine, I find mentions of it in
re
Le 24/07/2015 19:06, Guillaume Turri a écrit :
> So, to put it in a nutshell: do you confirm this library isn't
> available in Debian -and that I can go on, and open an ITP?
Hi Guillaume,
You can go ahead, I confirm it isn't in Debian yet. When you are looking
for a file I suggest using apt-file
Hello! I have just installed a Debian Stable system with cdebootstrap
(cdebootstrap jessie ./ http://ftp.ru.debian.org/debian/) and in this
new system I found the following packages, which have "standard" priority:
libcap2
libdb5.3
libgcrypt20
libgnutls-deb0-28
libgnutls-openssl27
libgpg-error0
Hi,
Ansgar Burchardt (2015-05-05):
> [ Please send replies only to boot@ ]
>
> I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
> is the list of packages with priorities required, important and
> standard. In general my plan involves installing less, taking into
> conside
Am 24.07.2015 um 20:13 schrieb Jayson Willson:
> Hello! I have just installed a Debian Stable system with cdebootstrap
> (cdebootstrap jessie ./ http://ftp.ru.debian.org/debian/) and in this
> new system I found the following packages, which have "standard" priority:
>
> libcap2
> libdb5.3
> libgc
Le 24 juil. 2015 19:30, "Emmanuel Bourg" a écrit :
> You can go ahead, I confirm it isn't in Debian yet. When you are looking
> for a file I suggest using apt-file, for example:
>
>apt-file find jsap | grep jar
>
> It's very useful to find the package containing a specific Maven
> artifact fo
Hi Kris,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
> I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only
> have a few ITPs out).
>
> Any chance you would be at DebCamp and could do a two day intense
> "catchup" on the involved work?
I'll be at DebConf.
Yes, that would be great! --Kris
On Jul 24, 2015 5:35 PM, "Daniel Leidert"
wrote:
> Hi Kris,
>
> Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
> > I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only
> > have a few ITPs out).
> >
> > Any chance you would be at
Processing control commands:
> block 793404 by -1
Bug #793404 [general] massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline
commands
793404 was blocked by: 793443 657390 793440 793330
793404 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 793404: 793554
--
793404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Fonts Task Force
* Package name: fonts-babelstone-han
Version : 8.0.0
Upstream Author : (c) Copyright 1994-1999, Arphic Technology Co., Ltd.
Christopher J. Fynn
* URL : http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Fonts
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 10:14 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Thoughts?
Looks good to me.
This will be more useful once the Debian PPA idea is implemented.
Where does the name of the file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ come from?
I would suggest reviewing Ubuntu's solution for adding PPA sources.li
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 19:00:18 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The tag being experimental is orthogonal to its severity. If you are
> interested in seeing it become a non-experimental tag, I can recommend
> having a look at writing a patch for #787853. From memory, the
> information needed is
Hi!
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 11:10:25 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I would suggest reviewing Ubuntu's solution for adding PPA sources.list
> snippets and seeing if we can take any inspiration from it or make our
> solution more compatible with it.
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories/Ubun
Package: wnpp
Owner: Christopher Hoskin
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libposix-2008-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Carsten Gaebler
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/POSIX-2008
* Li
32 matches
Mail list logo
