Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Ole Streicher , 2015-07-17, 10:34:
>> >But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package
>> >size of 3.5 GB.
>>
>> Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
>>
>> * The biggest binary package
Hi
Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution? Also in
regards to cost...
Pedro.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> Troy Benjegerdes writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> * Ole Streicher , 2015-07-17, 10:34:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: icedove-thunderlink
Version: 1.2.1
Upstream Author: Christoph Zwirello
URL: https://github.com/poohsen/thunderlink
License: Mozilla
> Hi
> Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution? Also in
> regards to cost...
gittorrent[1] would be great for this.
[1]
http://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittorrent-a-decentralized-github/
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@l
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> > +1
>> > Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
>>
>> something like
>> https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
>
> Yes.
>
>> ? not sure if I would actually
Pedro Larroy writes:
> Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution?
> Also in regards to cost...
I am a bit afraid about the long-term availability of any non-standard,
new solution: Anything we implement now (and used for Debian 9) should
be supported for the whole LTS time
Ben Finney writes:
> Distributing them to Debian recipients makes the implicit promise that
> they are free by the DFSG, or that they should be removed from Debian if
> that's discovered to be untrue.
Can't we just put non-free logos to non-free? In main they could be
replaced by either a simple
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:52:33AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > Distributing them to Debian recipients makes the implicit promise that
> > they are free by the DFSG, or that they should be removed from Debian if
> > that's discovered to be untrue.
>
> Can't we just put non-free logos to non-fre
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:09:37PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Screenshots of games during play are not the same as logos.
>
> Are you saying that screenshots of logos aren't derivative works of those
> logos?
I'm saying you can't derive a
Hi Ole,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:36:56AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> ? not sure if I would actually like to be "The Speaker" ;)
> >
> > Why not. Your mail contained someconstructove details that could
> > kickstart a discussion. There is not more needed in a BoF.
>
> I'd support this -
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:52:33AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> > Distributing them to Debian recipients makes the implicit promise that
>> > they are free by the DFSG, or that they should be removed from Debian if
>> > that's discovered to be untrue.
>>
>> Can't we
Andreas Tille writes:
>> I doubt that we can or should reproduce the catalogs from the
>> original exposures in Debian -- this would require disk space,
>> computing power and man power which we obviously don't have.
>
> May be ftpmaster might give some input here - if we are lucky one
> ftpmaster
Hello Praveen,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:54:15PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I ran a successful crowd funding campaign to work full time for a
> month on diaspora packaging
> (http://www.indiegogo.com/at/debian-diaspora) and here is the summary
> of work done.
>
> diaspora init script updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015, ജൂലൈ 18 5:54:04 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>That's really nice, thanks for keeping us updated.
>
>What is the current status with regards to having a proper diaspora
>package in the debian archive (with all its dependencies also in t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender
* Package name: pytest-localserver
Version : 0.3.4
Upstream Author : Sebastian Rahlf
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytest-localserver
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:41:44AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Pedro Larroy writes:
> > Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution?
> > Also in regards to cost...
>
> I am a bit afraid about the long-term availability of any non-standard,
> new solution: Anything we imple
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> It's less of a library than an environment used for research. Compiling
> is just a required step to run your code, but applications are usually
> not distributed in binary form.
What is the benefit of providing a shared library a
17 matches
Mail list logo
