On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 at 18:01 Neil Williams wrote:
> The github pull request is just a nice UI over a patch. What on earth
> is wrong with that?
>
Unfortunately, github pull requests have limitations compared with patches,
archived for example on a mailing list. For blog post on this see:
https
Guillem Jover (2015-04-18):
> General News
>
>
> * Raphaël Hertzog has stepped down as maintainer.
It seems a little sad there's not even a thanks or two, so here it is:
Thanks so much for all the hard (and not only technical) work, Raphaël!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
❦ 19 avril 2015 07:34 GMT, Brian May :
> Unfortunately, github pull requests have limitations compared with
> patches, archived for example on a mailing list. For blog post on this
> see:
>
> https://julien.danjou.info/blog/2013/rant-about-github-pull-request-workflow-implementation
>
> IIRC, my
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 at 18:25 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> This is not the case anymore. Deleting a branch leaves the pull request
> as is. Also, editing commits leave the history of the pull request in
> the timeline. Comments on edited commits are also still accessible.
>
Oh, if that is the case tha
On 17 April 2015 at 18:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
>
>> Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast
>> majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years
>> ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything
>> else".
>
Neil Williams writes:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:55:17 +1000
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > GitHub's pull request feature is proprietary to GitHub, it can only
> > work between repositories hosted inside the GitHub silo, and any
> > project using that feature is thereby locking its workflow to the
> >
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
> things, it would be great if you could:
>
> Mirror the repositories to alioth so Debian has a backup.
I'd rather see it the other way around: advertise the alioth Git re
On 18 April 2015 at 08:03, Ben Finney wrote:
> Paul Tagliamonte writes:
>
>> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think
>> this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should
>> endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to
>> the F/O
On 19 April 2015 at 21:00, Ben Finney wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:55:17 +1000
>> Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>> > GitHub's pull request feature is proprietary to GitHub, it can only
>> > work between repositories hosted inside the GitHub silo, and any
>> > project using t
Hi,
I'd like to start linking /usr/bin/perl statically against libperl on
all architectures instead of just on *i386 like now. See #781476
for some more details. I'm looking for input on this.
Pros:
A we can treat all architectures the same way -> simpler packaging
B slightly improved per
Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015, 10.25:11 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Thanks so much for all the hard (and not only technical) work,
> Raphaël!
Indeed, thank you buxy!
OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hallo,
* Guillem Jover [Sat, Apr 18 2015, 09:27:26PM]:
> * Add support for versioned Provides [!]:
> - Packages can provide a specific version, “virtual (= 1.0)” which will
> be honored, previously it would just be accepted when parsing.
That's great news! This will make a lot of evil kludg
Hi,
Niko Tyni wrote:
> Cons:
> E increased memory usage on systems running multiple perl processes
> F possibly increased startup time for short perl scripts
> (but that may be a non-issue due to caching anyway?)
This sounds rather concerning to me. The again, I've never noticed any
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 15:47:16 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:50:11PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > I'll curate the raw run I did today, since I saw a few false positive
> > (python 3 backports to python 3) and file them. I'll run a dd-list at
> > some point bef
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 18.04.2015, 23:54 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schauer:
> for source packages that require versioned virtual packages, dose3 support for
> this is needed because otherwise the affected source packages will remain
> bd-uninstallable. But right now dose3 can only parse versioned provi
❦ 19 avril 2015 08:55 GMT, Brian May :
> I suspect not many people know about this however (did I miss an
> announcement from github on this?), and I suspect it may not be
> possible to make changes to the pull request without write access to
> the branch.
Yes, that's not possible.
> Unlike wi
❦ 19 avril 2015 19:00 +1000, Ben Finney :
>> The pull request exists on github, fine.
>
> How can a collaborator Alice, with no GitHub account, get the pull
> request?
Take a random PR:
https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/pull/16258
Append ".patch" to get the patch:
curl https://github.com/twb
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:00:33 +1000
Ben Finney wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:55:17 +1000
> > Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > GitHub's pull request feature is proprietary to GitHub, it can
> > > only work between repositories hosted inside the GitHub silo, and
> > > any
basemap
uploaded to experimental, waiting for NEW
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/basemap_1.0.7%2Bdfsg-2.html
Cheers,
Sandro
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:50:11PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Severity will be wishlist. Target
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:12:57 +1200
Robert Collins wrote:
> On 18 April 2015 at 08:03, Ben Finney
> wrote:
> > Paul Tagliamonte writes:
> >
> >> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't
> >> think this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we
> >> should endorse
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:02:40PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 31.03.2015, 12:34 +0200 schrieb Jeroen Dekkers:
>
> > Dropping packages that need help from the help-wanted list doesn't
> > solve any problem, it only hides problems and makes it even less
> > likely that packag
Neil Williams writes:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:00:33 +1000
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > How can a collaborator Alice, with no GitHub account, get the pull
> > request?
>
> Public github repositories do not need a github account to clone.
This is quite frustrating. There's some serious equivocating
Le dimanche 19 avril 2015, 12:25:28 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015, 10.25:11 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > Thanks so much for all the hard (and not only technical) work,
> > Raphaël!
>
> Indeed, thank you buxy!
>
> OdyX
+1. Thanks a lot Raphaël.
Cheers,
Thomas
sig
*Thanks* :)
--
“I don’t think security can solve problems.
We need to teach greater respect.”
Oslo Mayor Stang when asked whether Oslo needs greater security
after the attacks in Norway, 07/2011.
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
❦ 20 avril 2015 00:18 +1000, Ben Finney :
> Likewise, as an external party Alice can collaborate via ‘git
> send-email’ or ‘git request-pull’ on an equal footing with any other
> repo (including GitHub repos). But Bob, having chosen GitHub's
> proprietary pull requests as an essential part of hi
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The resulting debs are installable with dpkg -i ( \o/ ). I have not
> tried anything fancy like setting up a local APT mirror and tried to
> convince APT do install it.
I did and apt works with ddeb just fine, meaning it can happily
Ben Finney writes:
> We're told that GitHub has a raft of features that make it superior,
> until it's pointed out that those features are GitHub-specific and
> incompatible with collaborators from outside; then, conveniently, the
> specialness of those features dwindles to insignificance because
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
>> things, it would be great if you could:
>> Mirror the repositories to alioth so Debian has a backup.
> I'd rather see it the other way a
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:27:01AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The repositories and Git management are the very nice features of GitHub,
> and there's nothing there data-wise you can't pretty trivially extract.
> It's just a very nice UI.
In fact, joeyh wrote a nice tool[0] that will extract all
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 02:41:47PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> You might want to give people more than 24 hours to comment. A week
> seems like the bare minimum to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
Euch, sorry, I filed them this morning, but it was only like 40 or so
packages, a chunk of which are DPM
Hi,
On Sun Apr 19, 2015 at 16:25:30 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Improvements in this release of the installer
> =
>
> * apt-setup:
> - Stop enabling backports by default (#764982).
(i have read the BR)
I consider this this 'last minute' chan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: libmuscle
Version : 3.7
Upstream Author : Aaron Darling
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/p/mauve/code/HEAD/tree/muscle/
* License : Public domain
Programming Lang: C++
Description : mu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: libmems
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Aaron Darling
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/p/mauve/code/HEAD/tree/libMems/trunk/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : library
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jörg Frings-Fürst"
* Package name: pysimplesoap
Version : 1.16
Upstream Author : Mariano Reingart
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pysimplesoap
* License : LGPL-3.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python
On 20 April 2015 at 02:18, Ben Finney wrote:
> Robert Collins writes:
>
>> Have you used github? If not you should: the best position to critique
>> a system from is one of familiarity.
>
> If I were to critique only the effects GitHub has for the individual who
> uses it, that would be a valid p
Hi,
As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
status of the architectures in unstable.
Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
therefore looking at their future in unstable.
SPARC
=
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Guillem Jover (2015-04-18):
> > General News
> >
> >
> > * Raphaël Hertzog has stepped down as maintainer.
>
> It seems a little sad there's not even a thanks or two, so here it is:
> Thanks so much for all the hard (and not only technical) work,
> Raphaël
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 at 00:19 Ben Finney wrote:
> This is quite frustrating. There's some serious equivocating by GitHub
> apologists in this discussion:
It GitHub better then the open source GitLab?
If the answer is Yes, is there any obstacles to trying to improve GitLab so
it does what we wan
Russ Allbery writes:
> It's a UI. The UI is really nice. That's why people use it. But
> lock-in implies more than a really nice UI that people use because
> it's superior.
By lock-in I'm implying vendor lock-in: the customer or user is unable
to switch away from the vendor's service without sig
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:10 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> I would presume most derivatives aren't using it either
Most derivatives appear to use reprepro but there is one using apt-ftparchive
https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/CensusFull
https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census/Lihuen
>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I mirror the repositories on my own publicly-accessible Git server.
> Hopefully that's good enough. :)
If those are Debian related, I'd still suggest m
On Sun, 2015-04-19 at 11:20 -0600, D. Charles Pyle wrote:
> My machine is a Sparc64 machine.
...
> if I can help, I can try to do so.
An update: sparc will be removed from the Debian archive unless a team
of people is willing to work on the port and bring it back in shape:
https://lists.debian.o
42 matches
Mail list logo
